Sharing an IBM ATL Across Systems

I need to be able to share an IBM ATL across various systems (first level and guestOSs). I set up VM:Tape Shared Tape Allocation Manager (STAM) on all of the systems (first level and guestOSs). I then attached the tape drives using: CP ATTACH 300-303 BFSDEV MULTIUSER NOASSIGN

Re: OSA configurations

, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably a dumb question, but I don't know the answer... Is it possible for a single OSA port to be a part of 3 different network types (trusted, private and public)? In other words, can it be set up to use IPL addresses in the range

How to Issue Commands to other Systems

I need to be able to issue commands to other systems. The RSCS network can be managed through the SMSG RSCS system rscs-command What I need to do is issue commands: 1) CP Commands (FORCE AUTOLOG etc.) 2) And invoke applications that can only start after another application has

Re: Privilege Class Override

Subject: Re: Privilege Class Override Do you have a MODIFY command in your SYSTEM CONFIG? If so, the override file is ignored at system start-up Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS

Privilege Class Override

This has me puzzled... I have an override UCR file set up to add an additional privilege class. The system was running as a level 2 system. This override file worked fine. The level 2 system was IPLed as a level 1 system, the UCR override file is not functioning. I can resave it (OVERRIDE

OSA configurations

This is probably a dumb question, but I don't know the answer... Is it possible for a single OSA port to be a part of 3 different network types (trusted, private and public)? In other words, can it be set up to use IPL addresses in the range of the trusted, private and public? If so, what would

Re: z/VM 5.1 Paging

Thank you. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Bill Bitner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 9:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.1 Paging Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Presently I have a base VM:Backup running

z/VM 5.1 Paging

Our production system was migrated from z/VM 3.1 to z/VM 5.1 over the weekend. The paging rate was high this morning on the production system as the VM:Backup backups were running. (It was paging over 2000 pages per second.) When I did a Q ALLOC PAGE, it indicated the percentage used was 55%.

Re: z/VM 5.1 Paging

Are you saying the MDC READS - 142/SEC could be driving the page space used to 55%? The paging rate itself is 1/SEC... We added 2 paging volumes to ensure the system does not run out of paging space. Our production system is a guest system under z/VM 5.1. I don't know if this would matter in

Re: z/VM 5.1 Paging

Ms. WHS/ITMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you saying the MDC READS - 142/SEC could be driving the page space used to 55%? The paging rate itself is 1/SEC... We added 2 paging volumes to ensure the system does not run out of paging space. I'm not sure he implied that, but it is certainly true

3270 Emulator

Where can I find what the documentation says for 3270 connections failing? I am getting a 655. I know this means it can not establish a connection, but where is the message documented? I need the exact description. Thank you. Cecelia Dusha

Re: 3270 Emulator

of the session screen. If not, the host system port has not been configured for SSL. Try setting SSL on the client and reconnecting. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:30 AM To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System' Subject: 3270

SYSPROF

Hello, I need to modify SYSPROF EXEC. On my vanilla zVM 5.1 system, I successfully implemented this change. On the test system I am building for the customers I am experiencing problems. The SYSPROF EXEC on MAINT 190 disk has the modification. I have resaved ALL of the cms segments (CMSFILES,

Re: SYSPROF

the segments, the modified code was picked up - even though CMSINST LSEGMAP point to the 490 disk... Thanks. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 9:33 AM To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System' Subject: RE: SYSPROF I realized this reads

Re: SYSPROF

I realized this reads as if this is a coding problem... SYSPROF EXEC does invoke the userid's PROFILE EXEC which is the next statement... It just does not execute the modification... Thanks. Cecelia Dusha -Original Message- From: Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Friday, August 04

Shared Volumes

Hello, I would like to share a volume on multiple zVM systems.  Each system would have different area on the volume they could write to, the other areas would be read only.  Each system needs to be able to write to this volume at the same time.  Is this do-able?  If so, how is this

Re: Shared Volumes

I figured it out I could share the volume on 4 of 5 systems, but was having a problem getting the 5th system to work  It is resolved now. Thank you. Cecelia Dusha From: Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:36 AM To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System

Restrict DIAL Command

Hello, I have VM:Secure as our external security manager. I need to restrict access to one of our level 2 systems. I thought the DIAL command could be used to restrict access. In the VMXRPI CONFIG file I have the following coded: VMXTRAP DIAL CP has been build with this. I have the

Re: 3390 Huge Volumes

I greatly appreciate all the information everyone provided. Thank you. Cecelia Dusha

3390 Huge Volumes

The 3390 mod 9 are not large enough for the customer's application. What is the largest volume z/VM 5.1 can handle? If only the data utilized the one huge volume, what would be the repercussions? Please advice. Cecelia Dusha

Re: Webgateway Question

if VM:WEBGATEWAY has a specific DNS parameter. Ed Martin _ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Thu 5/11/2006 12:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: VM:Webgateway Question When someone accesses the VM:Webgateway via a browser on my

VM:Webgateway Question

When someone accesses the VM:Webgateway via a browser on my system, the following appears in the console log for that web server. *8 08:08:20 WBSWEB1 0D VIWDNS1598I DNS server xxx.xxx.xx.x timed out resolving the CNAME for the IPADDR www.www.ww.www. *8 08:08:50 WBSWEB1 0D

Re: zVM 5.1 Res Volume

Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:19 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: zVM 5.1 Res Volume I am experiencing a strange problem with my zVM 5.1 res volumes. The zVM 5.1 res volume

Re: zVM 5.1 Res Volume

. Shutdown VM, use stand-alone DDR to copy new 510RES cyl 0 to old, and new 510RES DRCT cyls to old 510RES, re-IPL old 510RES -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dusha, Cecelia Ms. WHS/ITMD Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:45 AM

Re: 3390 Mod 3 verses 3390 Mod 9s

The application is going to combine several NOMAD databases into 1 NOMAD database. We are only going to setup mod 9s for this purpose. We will continue to use mod 3s for the rest of our data and applications. I greatly appreciate your help. Thank you. Cecelia Dusha IT Specialist (Operating

3390 Mod 3 verses 3390 Mod 9s

I have a question that pertains to performance. We currently have 3390 mod 3 defined volumes. The customer requires a larger mini disk size than what will fit on a 3390 mod 3. We are planning to create 3390 mod 9s for their larger mini disks. Would someone explain the performance hit that

Re: 3390 Mod 3 verses 3390 Mod 9s

Presently the application is split onto several disks. The data is to be combined onto one disk. The data is a NOMAD database. The DASD is on DS6800. I thought PAV was not an option for VM. Does z/VM 5.2 support PAV? I had not considered SFS as a possibility... SFS would add more overhead.