You didn't mention how you generated your new module, but if it needs to
run as a nucleus extension then you at least need to use the RLD option
on the LOAD command:
load rxtpcf ( rld
genmod rxtpcf
Ray Mansell
Rothman, Peter wrote:
What is the 'special' way of genning the module?
Shimon Lebowitz wrote:
CP MSG target variable_with_mixedcase_text
What have I missed?
Thanks!
Shimon
Try this:
Address command CP MSG target variable_with_mixedcase_text
Ray
Right is right.
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
Where does the prefix field belong?
On the left?
or
On the right?
the maximum supported for your machine?
(Or maybe there's some way I'm not aware of to bypass this limit.)
Of course, even if CP did constrain you to the maximum supported, you'd
still be in trouble! I'm just curious concerning the actual numbers quoted.
Ray Mansell
P.s. Constrained to 1TB
Marcy Cortes wrote:
When I did an IND USER on him, it did say 1TB - must have taken him
lower at logon time. It happily let me put 1500GB in the directory.
Ah yes... that explains it. When you used the word define, I thought
you meant the DEFINE command.
And yes, you can put any
Julie Erickson wrote:
Is there a supported COBOL compiler on z/VM 5.2? Is COBOL for OS/390 and
VM (product code 5648-A25) still supported and available?
I found a posting from 2001 mentioning the above compiler. It seems
pretty old.
I'd appreciate any information. I have some COBOL code
Ron Schmiedge wrote:
I believe it was withdrawn for MVS only, it is still available and
orderable for z/VM (at least it was when we ordered z/VM 5.2 last
year). It did take some coaxing and pointing to the right announcement
letter paragraphs to convince IBM of this, if I recall correctly.
Ron
system extremely secure.
Of course, it would also render it totally useless :-)
Ray Mansell
Lee Stewart wrote:
Is there a way to tell from a CP command if a guest is running in 31
bit or 64 bit mode?
Thanks
Lee
Not directly, but you could issue the DISPLAY PSW command on behalf of
the target user (using the FOR command in z/VM 5.3, or via SCIF for
earlier releases) and interpret the
Dave Jones wrote:
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as
being IBM's premier virtualisation product - not that I have anything
Macioce, Larry wrote:
But isn't lparing a VM technology??
Larry
Yes - LPAR and z/VM share a common ancestor, and there's still some of
my own code in LPAR from wy back, but these days they are very
different beasts.
Ray M
to
or from the system operator are not subject to authorization checking
by the ESM. For additional information, contact your security
administrator.
I hope this is sufficient for you to determine where the problem is.
Ray
going on there.
Good luck!
Ray Mansell
For an FTP server (and I assume you are talking about a Windows PC - I
know, big assumption), you can't go wrong with FileZilla.
Ray
Anne Crabtree wrote:
Well, it just so happenend, not sure how, that my VM session went from
running to vm read and then the ftp server timed out. I don't know
Hmmm... I can't help, though I suspect a simple HX would do the trick.
However, you might want to do some investigation, since I also did an
FTP install last week, and it took less than an hour.
Or, just leave it running overnight. Is there any reason you can't do that?
Ray Mansell
Anne
Kris Buelens wrote:
COPYFILE (PACK is very simple, I never looked in the actual details
but it replaces multiple occurances of the same character, inexpensive
but not lots of gains. TERSE is much like ZIP and VMARC. The FCOPY
tool on the download lib has a PACK option too, but that works
When CMS is searching for something executable, it does not search
extensions before intervening disks.
However, you could EXECLOAD your exec - that will find it according to
the extension rules. Not maximally convenient, I know...
Ray Mansell
Ian S. Worthington wrote:
Hmmm. That's what
likely to be autologged, you'll
probably want to include SET AUTOREAD OFF in its profile exec.
Ray Mansell
Rob van der Heij wrote:
Yeah, was written way back... ;-) I recall the Y2K version of VMARC
never was picked up for the IBM internal systems. That bit me a few
times as well.
Rob
Since 1907 appears on the formatted front page, I assume it is SCRIPT
that is getting confused. In the version I
Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing that might be nice is to have his later ObjectREXX
on z/VM
That would be Simon Nash's Object REXX (just to get the attribution
where it belongs :-))
Ray Mansell
to maximum allowed.
STORAGE = 256G
Storage cleared - system reset.
Ray Mansell
Phil Smith III wrote:
So if I had 1G before, I get to reIPL? That's a change in behavior, and makes the
issue a ridiculous size to see what my max is unworkable! Or am I misreading
what
Alan Altmark wrote:
2064 - z900
2066 - z800
2084 - z990
2086 - z890
2094 - z9 EC
2096 - z9 BC
A pattern emerges. ;-)
Aha! So this little, rack-mounted 2074 we have in the lab must have some
additional capabilities I had never suspected before! I'll go and check
it out right now...
Schuh, Richard wrote:
Dave,
The URL is Non-working, even if resolve the issue of it being split
into 2 pieces.
Hmmm... it worked for me, and it wasn't split, either
Ray Mansell
attribute codes involved.
Ray Mansell...
Fran Hensler wrote:
I found the codes for hilite and normal in an EXEC that I did not
write. I have tried codes like these to do color but I was not
successful.
Gonen Shoham wrote:
So where is this Assemble pgm
It's on my A-disk, of course. I guess I should bundle it up and make it
available as-is...
, and 'there' is
blue.
Ray Mansell
IBM Hawthorne
us know, since it
definitely needs to be fixed.
Thank you,
Ray Mansell
Steve Gentry wrote:
Respectfully, Richard, I ran across some doc somewhere that recommended
that the MACHINE TYPE for VMSERx (U and S) machines be set to XC so that
they can use XSTORE. Whether VMSERx actually uses x
Ken,
Can you tell us the level of CP where this happens, and the associated
condition code? I've just spent an hour or so poring over the 5.2
source code for diag A8, and I can't see any way return code 3 can
happen.
Ray Mansell
Ken Vance wrote:
Hi,
We are using DIAG A8, and we
This annoys me, too. There are a couple of ways around it: (i) use
keyboard mapping so that some key appears to the host as 0x5F, or (ii)
use the regular ALL command, followed by the DISP 0 0 command (to show
the excluded lines).
Ray Mansell
Don W. wrote:
I'm not sure how to use in XEDIT
Lynn,
I can report that Parasite and Story are alive and well. I still have
the source, have been maintaining it, and still use both programs on a
daily basis...
Ray Mansell
IBM Research
(ex-IBM Hursley)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parasite did 3270 terminal emulation. it was less than 8k
30 matches
Mail list logo
