On Monday, 12/14/2009 at 01:24 EST, Alan Ackerman
alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'm sorry, Sir Alan, but there really were AP (Attached Processor)
mode
ls in which the base
processor could do I/O and the attached processor could not. the IBM
3033
AP was one such
model. See
http://www
it had.
2009/12/14 Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
On Monday, 12/14/2009 at 01:24 EST, Alan Ackerman
alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'm sorry, Sir Alan, but there really were AP (Attached Processor)
mode
ls in which the base
processor could do I/O and the attached processor could
] On Behalf Of Alan Ackerman
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:25 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
I'm sorry, Sir Alan, but there really were AP (Attached
Processor) mode= ls in which the base processor could do I/O
and the attached processor could not. the IBM
couldn't perform I/O; on an MP, both could perform I/O, but
each
only to the channels it had.
This Alan was wrong and I yield the field.
Indeed, I was conflating AP and MP. Yes, in AP, there was only one
channel set (16 channels) and it belonged the base processor. (At the
time, processor
On: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:08PM -0700,Scott Rohling Wrote:
} ahem .. as long as n = 2 :-)
}
} Scott
}
} On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
}
} Hats off to Alan. He has, again, come through with a sensible answer, and a
} bit of history. Our
You got me... I need to read more carefully. Cheers -
Scott
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Rich Greenberg ric...@panix.com wrote:
On: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:08PM -0700,Scott Rohling Wrote:
} ahem .. as long as n = 2 :-)
}
} Scott
}
} On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM,
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
ahem .. as long as n = 2 :-)
Scott
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Schuh, Richard
rsc...@visa.commailto:rsc...@visa.com wrote:
Hats off to Alan. He has, again, come through with a sensible answer, and a bit
of history. Our MVS guys confirmed
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:14 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
ahem .. as long as n = 2 :-)
Scott
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Schuh, Richard
rsc...@visa.commailto:rsc...@visa.com wrote:
Hats off to Alan. He has, again, come
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
You got me... I need to read more carefully. Cheers -
Scott
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Rich Greenberg
ric
it really
make
any difference in this environment. In terms of real processors, at one
time
the base processor had to do the I/O. I do not believe that is true any
more. Am I correct? and when did that stop being the case?
The base CPU is the first CPU that is defined to your virtual machine.
What
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
On Wednesday, 12/09/2009 at 08:20 EST, Don W. thisus...@yahoo.com
wrote:
When
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Base Processor?
On Wednesday, 12/09/2009 at 08:20 EST, Don W. thisus...@yahoo.com
wrote:
When you set up the directory entry for a z/OS guest with multiple
virtual
CPU's (e.g. CPU 00, CPU 01) and you QUERY CPUS, CPU 00
shows as BASE.
What
, at one t
ime
the base processor had to do the I/O. I do not believe that is true any
more. Am I correct? and when did that stop being the case?
13 matches
Mail list logo
