] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:14 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: CMS Levels
Tomorrow will be our next (last, we hope) attempt to move to 5.2. In the
event that we should have to regress to our current system, I was
wondering if it is possible and prudent to leave some
On Monday, 05/08/2006 at 09:05 AST, Stracka, James (GTI)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had a problem in the past when running an SFS SVM at a higher CMS
level than CP. Specifically the VMSYS: SVM took an abend. We now
insure that CP is always higher than or equal to both CMS and GCS.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:09 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: CMS Levels
On Monday, 05/08/2006 at 09:05 AST, Stracka, James (GTI)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tomorrow will be our next (last, we hope) attempt to move to 5.2. In the event
that we should have to regress to our current system, I was wondering if it is
possible and prudent to leave some of our servers at the CMS22 level.
Specifically, is it necessary to fallback the SFS and NFS servers?
