The SMAPI server requires a directory manager, and DirMaint has been
enhanced to work with the new server. From IBM's perspective,
there is no reason to not go there just yet.
One reason might be that your provisioning product supports the RPC server
but does not (yet?) support the SMAPI
All true, and I agree. Marcy didn't ask about specific products, and
I did not mean to imply anything about exploiter products and/or
releases; my intent was to clarify things relative to the SMAPI server
virtual machines and z/VM releases.
John Franciscovich
z/VM Development
Well, I guess it
, November 15, 2007 11:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question about SMAPI
VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).
VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server
about SMAPI
Am I right in understanding that VSMSERVE was replaced by VSMREQIN and
VSMREQIU and the VSMWORK* machines going in z/VM 5.3?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive
Am I right in understanding that VSMSERVE was replaced by VSMREQIN and
VSMREQIU and the VSMWORK* machines going in z/VM 5.3?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must
VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).
VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server implementation
... the socket server. However, I wouldn't go there just yet ...
(SMAPI = Systems
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about SMAPI
VSMSERVE is the RPC version of the SMAPI server and is still
valid for
use on z/VM 5.3, for example with VM:Secure 2.8 (or DIRMAINT).
VSMREQIN, VSMREQIU, etc. are part of the new SMAPI server
implementation
... the socket server
