--- Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 05:36 EST, Dave Wade
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Its been a while since I looked at this code but
> from
> > what I remember RECEIVE calls DMSDDL for files in
> > NETDATA format...
>
> Wow. It has been a while! 20 y
That was indeed the case the first 10 years; since a merger a 3'th
letter was appended ;-(
I often remember one of my first meetings with the account team (4SE &
3 SR) where there was a long list of tasks with the initials of the
responsible for the task and I saw my initials on more than half of
t
On Jan 23, 2008 8:33 AM, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 20 years, that's also the number of years I'm supporting my current
> customer; they were new to VM and started with VM/SP Rel 6 on a 9370.
> My IBM life with this customer is now exactly double of my IBM life
> preceeding it.
And
20 years, that's also the number of years I'm supporting my current
customer; they were new to VM and started with VM/SP Rel 6 on a 9370.
My IBM life with this customer is now exactly double of my IBM life
preceeding it.
2008/1/23, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 05:3
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 05:36 EST, Dave Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its been a while since I looked at this code but from
> what I remember RECEIVE calls DMSDDL for files in
> NETDATA format...
Wow. It has been a while! 20 years to be exact :-)
In VM/SP Release 6, the internal DMS
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 5:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
Undoubtedly the Pipelines "deblock netdata" stage does something like
that.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Messa
: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
>
> --- "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just off the top of my head, you might want to look at pipe stages
> > READER or UR .. I think that might work .. or look at
> READCAR
--- "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just off the top of my head, you might want to look
> at pipe stages READER or
> UR .. I think that might work .. or look at READCARD
> which is what RECEIVE
Its been a while since I looked at this code but from
what I remember RECEIVE calls DMSDD
> That is not an option (or, better put, not an option that is
> easy to implement), since the VM/CMS users are not on the same VM as
the
> VSEs from which we are punching the members. Yes, I know that I could
> set up RSCS and, with VM/VTAM, I could accomplish this.
Use the TCPNJE support
a single write.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:44 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
>
>
ike I
said, just an option.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:59 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
Thomas:
Was that similar to DEPRINT? If so, t
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 12:55 EST, "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Using the site command is probably best for you right now..
> Here is a quick description of READPRT it may be of interest because
the
> source is available so you can change it to do anything you like.
But wh
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
Using the site command is probably best for you right now..
Here is a quick description of READPRT it may be of interest because the
source is
IN EACH LOGICAL RECORD. *
It's only about 200 instructions .
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:40 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
Behalf Of Fran Hensler
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:35 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
David -
I would not use FTP but punch my ICCF member to VM via a virtual punch.
I would expect RECEIVE would then make them RECFM 'F'.
/Fran
On Tue, 22 Jan
s
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:26 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
Or if you are adventuress I have two programs you can have. 1) READPRT I
think this is an old program that was available for download. I have the
source. 2) READLIST I only have the module, don'
Thanks, Alan. That was the answer!
David Wakser
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 11:55
David -
I would not use FTP but punch my ICCF member to VM via a
virtual punch. I would expect RECEIVE would then make them
RECFM 'F'.
/Fran
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:53:49 -0700 Wakser, David said:
>No, the files are NOT sent by SENDFILE but by FTP from a VSE POWER
>queue.
>
>David Wakser
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:26 AM
>To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
>
>That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the opposite.
>When I RECEIVE PRT files from a VSE virtual 3800 they are always RECFM
>'F' and 2
the
module. It works..
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
No, the files are NOT sent by SENDFILE but by FTP from a
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 11:55 EST, "Wakser, David"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, the files are NOT sent by SENDFILE but by FTP from a VSE POWER
queue.
Unless you issue a SITE FIX command, the RDR support in VM FTP
sends files as RECFM V. Perhaps VSE is padding each record with blanks?
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
01/22/2008 10:26 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RECEIVE question
That's funny David because I have often wished for e
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: RECEIVE question
That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the opposite.
When I RECEIVE PRT files from a VSE virtual 3800 they are always RECFM
'F' and 205 bytes even if the longest print line is 10 bytes. If they
were rec
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
01/22/2008 10:26 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RECEIVE question
That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the
opposite
On Jan 22, 2008 5:26 PM, Fran Hensler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the
> opposite.
They say you can't do it right for everyone. But apparently you can do
it wrong for everyone ;-)
If the situation is common enough that an extra COPYFILE
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 11:35 EST, Fran Hensler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the
> opposite. When I RECEIVE PRT files from a VSE virtual 3800 they are
> always RECFM 'F' and 205 bytes even if the longest print line is 10
> bytes. If they
That's funny David because I have often wished for exactly the
opposite. When I RECEIVE PRT files from a VSE virtual 3800 they are
always RECFM 'F' and 205 bytes even if the longest print line is 10
bytes. If they were received as 'V' it would save a lot of space.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock
On Tuesday, 01/22/2008 at 10:39 EST, "Wakser, David"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am issuing a RECEIVE from within an EXEC to receive a lot of
> files onto a minidisk. However, RECEIVE sets them up as record format
> "V" - and I want them to be "F". I see no options for this on the
> RECEIVE c
Just off the top of my head, you might want to look at pipe stages READER or
UR .. I think that might work .. or look at READCARD which is what RECEIVE
calls .. .
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Tuesday, January
29 matches
Mail list logo