> But, SNA is
> more of a Linux oriented company.
Definitely *not* the case. That's just a small part of what we do.
> Part of my question to all, is there a VM oriented site for
> documentation and other practices? VSE has one. Linux has many. VM
> has a download area for tools, but I don't
Hi Shimon
The SNA website (Sine Nomine Associates, not SNA/VTAM), might solve
half the problem, that is how to distribute the document. But, SNA is
more of a Linux oriented company. Yes, there also has some VM related
stuff. But I don't think that a VM shop without Linux, would really
come to o
> > Bug, IMHO. Valid route, should be valid syntax. The fact you *can*
shoot
> > yourself in the head is not the tool's problem. Your gun, your foot.
> [snip]
> I agree, allowing customers to shoot them selves in various parts of
their
> anatomy is *not* the tool's problem. However, it does become
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
I agree, allowing customers to shoot them selves in various parts
of their
anatomy is *not* the tool's problem. However, it does become our
problem
when the shot is taken, they call us and their overall user
experience is
less than favora
>> This is why the OSPF configuration in z/VM 5.2 no longer allows a mask
of
>> 255.255.255.255. I'm not saying z/OS is necessarily correct, I'm just
>> pointing it out to avoid further confusion. (Yeah, right. Sure.)
> Bug, IMHO. Valid route, should be valid syntax. The fact you *can* shoot
>
> In this I would agree, except to say "watch out" if you get into
OSPF/RIP,
> because (according to our z/OS brethren) the OSPF protocol doesn't
> recognize non-subnetted networks and subnets are required (RFC 3021's
> 31-bit masks notwithstanding, I guess).
Hmph. Class D routes and non-subnette
On Monday, 01/22/2007 at 07:59 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > And I assume the reason why Linux shows me a netmask of
> > 255.255.255.255 for P2P connections is there is some code,
>
> No, there's only one host on the other end of the link, so you don't
> actually have a subnet o
> At the time, I sat down and wrote a sort of 'cookbook'
> approach to what I wanted, and how I got it, and David Boyes
> generously volunteered to set ut up as a pdf document
> on SNA's website.
I'll be happy to provide similar service for this document as well.
Anything that gives me an opportun
> Historically, what I had (VCTCA and IUCV connections), was P2P. With
P2P
> you don't have a router address nor do you have a broadcast address.
Just
> wasn't needed.
Well, you do have a router address; it's just the other end of the link.
The presence of broadcast depends on the type of medi
On 19 Jan 2007 at 12:38, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
>
> I'm not thinking of something as formal as a manual, or even a Redbook.
> Perhaps something a little more than the foils of some presentation.
> (Usually a presentation doesn't happen at the right time, and the right
> time here is prior to a co
Well, imagine that, my test node (linux27) worked.
I guess things work right when you do it the legit way..
Who would have thunk?
So, now as I go back to try to correct my knowledge defect and get me on the
right path...
Historically, what I had (VCTCA and IUCV connections), was P2P. With P2P y
11 matches
Mail list logo
