Good morning all.
I have a quick question about SMTP.
I have SMTP mail server set up and am using the IPMAILERADDRESS ALL
xx.xx.xx.xx to route mail to the company mail server. This works fine for
sending mail from CMS to anyplace, the problem is I can't receive mail from
the outside. Is there
, August 20, 2007 10:50 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SMTP question
Good morning all.
I have a quick question about SMTP.
I have SMTP mail server set up and am using the IPMAILERADDRESS ALL
xx.xx.xx.xx to route mail to the company mail server. This works fine
for sending mail from
On Monday, 08/20/2007 at 10:51 EDT, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have SMTP mail server set up and am using the IPMAILERADDRESS ALL
xx.xx.xx.xx to route mail to the company mail server. This works fine
for
sending mail from CMS to anyplace, the problem is I can't receive mail
Specify SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION in your
SMTP CONFIG file I believe that support was added in z/VM 4.4.0
If you're on z/VM 5.1.0 or later, you
can specify RECEIVED, DELIVERED, or ALL after SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION to have
a bit more control over which messages you suppress
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM
:
Subject:Re: SMTP question
Specify SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION in your SMTP CONFIG file I believe that support was added in z/VM 4.4.0
If you're on z/VM 5.1.0 or later, you can specify RECEIVED, DELIVERED, or ALL after SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION to have a bit more control over which messages you suppress
On Wednesday, 06/21/2006 at 10:15 EST, Ed Zell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003.
Any chance that this APAR will be fitted back on to z/VM 4.4? It
would be great to get rid of the copy of TCPIP DATA that is on
the SMTP machine today
Title: another SMTP question - IPMAILERNAME instead of IPMAILERADDRESS -
hello VMers,
we are sending CMS-files via SMTP to our OUTLOOK mailserver.
I have definied the OUTLOOK mailsever in the SMTP CONFIG with the IPMAILERADDRESS statement.
Everything works fine.
But our network people
But our network people advised me, that I should not hardcode the
ip-address and use
an ip-name instead.
Good advice. It's only been 30 years since the introduction of the DNS;
it's about time we got past hardcoded IP addresses *anywhere*.
In the books I cant't find a smt config
On Wednesday, 06/21/2006 at 06:28 AST, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the books I cant't find a smt config configuration statement that
allows me to
use ipmailername instead of a ipmaileraddress. Is there a way to do it
anyhow ???
Not that I know of, or at least not with the VM
z/VM 5.1 and 5.2 customers will be interested in APAR PK07003.
It adds two things:
- IPMAILERADDRESS ALL (you no longer need the DNS hack)
- IPMAILERADDRESS hostname (incl. the LIST option)
Any chance that this APAR will be fitted back on to z/VM 4.4? It
would be great to get rid of the
We are trying to figure out if we can use Lotus NOTES relay email from VM out to the internet.
We would send the correct info to SMTP, SMTP would forward it on to NOTES and NOTES
would send it out to the internet.
Is this type of thing doable with VM (5.2) and NOTES?
Thanks.
Steve G.
Why do you want to send via notes instead of direct?
--- Steve Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are trying to figure out if we can use Lotus
NOTES relay email from
VM out to the internet.
We would send the correct info to SMTP, SMTP would
forward it on to NOTES
and NOTES
would send
Steve,
Yes, we did just that for a little while. You need to configure TCPIP 198
file SMTP CONFIG parameter IPMAILERADDRESS with the IP address of your
Notes MTA (I'm not sure what that stands for but its the Notes server which
receives non-Notes email) server and VM SMTP will forward any
We had to quit using it, however, because our
auditors were able to break
into it and it looked like it would take an exit to
stop them; and it
wasn't worth that. There were also other issues
around the corner
involving validation of the VM email sender. It
just got too messy for
what
The trouble with SMTP is that the E-Mail sender is
(usually) not verifiable. If you are just using NOTES
to relay out to the Internet this shouldn't be an
issue. However if you are going to allow Notes = VM
then it can be an issue for the Notes users. I think
the moral is that even on
15 matches
Mail list logo
