A second "harrumph" from your moderator, Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email

2008-05-07 Thread IBMVM Moderator
Ladies and Gentlemen: If you simply *must* continue to discuss this thread, *please* take the discussion off-line from the list. Our generous host, the University of Arkansas, donates the services and infrastructure which support this forum with the understanding that the discussion is prima

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-07 Thread Bill Pettit
AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: whitehouse email Yes, but the operator who suggested to the FBI that they look at the backups ended up being fired. Phil Parmelee IBM Global Services VM/VSE Team Harrisburg, PA 717-526-1250 T/L 239-1250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inactive hide details for A

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-06 Thread Mike Walter
Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: whitehouse email I heard it was email that brought North down. He thought he had deleted i t but, of course, he couldn't delete it from the backup tapes created by VMBACKUP. After this affair apparently several VMBACKUP

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-06 Thread Don Vining
I heard it was email that brought North down. He thought he had deleted i t but, of course, he couldn't delete it from the backup tapes created by VMBACKUP. After this affair apparently several VMBACKUP customers request ed information on how to selectively delete files from backup tapes.

Re: A word from our moderator, Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Jack Woehr
Daniel P. Martin wrote: opinions and insights regarding the clever antics of both past and present administrations "You don't trust your government!? Hell, I work for the government and I don't trust it." - GWB, or rather, the actor playing him in "Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay"

A word from our moderator, Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel P. Martin
Ladies, gentlemen, dear colleagues: All of us, perhaps most especially your humble moderator, cherish and hold dear our opinions and insights regarding the clever antics of both past and present administrations, sundry other governmental entities and assorted business concerns both public and

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Stracka, James (GTS)
: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:11 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: whitehouse email They got into trouble because, at that time, PROFs had no option to EVER delete an email. Everything that ever came thru PROFs was always retrieveable. That is, unless you formatted over the disks and tapes. There

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Jack Woehr
Tom Duerbusch wrote: They got into trouble because, at that time, PROFs had no option to EVER delete an email. Everything that ever came thru PROFs was always retrieveable. Of course this time, they're lying. Not because we can prove it, but because the officials current administration lie even

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Friday, May 02, 2008 7:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: whitehouse email The backups are kept safe and sound, right next to the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. But yeah, compared to the Clintons, the Bush regime has been remarkably scandal-free.

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Phillip Parmelee
z/VM Operating cc System <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject ARK.EDU> Re: whit

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread August Carideo
z/VM Operating SystemSubject <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: whitehouse email

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-05 Thread Edward M. Martin
nis L Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 7:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: whitehouse email The backups are kept safe and sound, right next to the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. But yeah, compared to the Clintons, the Bush regime has been remarkably scandal

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-04 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
nnis L" >Subject:   Re: whitehouse email >To:   IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > >The backups are kept safe and sound, right next to the Iraqi weapons of >mass destruction. > >But yeah, compared to the Clintons, the Bush regime has been remarkably >scandal-free. > >

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-02 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
s are? -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 16:13 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email No backups are needed. They have done nothing wrong or illegal, and not mu

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
2008 4:07 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: whitehouse email > > Or the more cynical among us would say how convenient for the > current administration midway through their last year. No > backups? Anywhere? > > Marcy Cortes > > "This mes

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-02 Thread Marcy Cortes
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:42 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email I personally think that this is more a comment on the government tendering systems generally in use, which d

Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-02 Thread Dave Wade
. > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Anne & Lynn Wheeler > Sent: 02 May 2008 14:44 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: whitehouse email > > you might find this news article interesting > > Whitehous

whitehouse email

2008-05-02 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
you might find this news article interesting Whitehouse Emails Were Lost Due to "Upgrade" http://news.slashdot.org/news/08/04/30/1359209.shtml and The case of the missing e-mail http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/bush-lost-e-mails.ars and for some more whitehouse email from 2