On Thursday, 10/14/2010 at 01:44 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
But will 6.1 run on a z9 or less? No, I've tried it.
So for a seamless migration to new hardware, maybe it is not so bad to
change
one thing at a time and keep 5.4.
True, there is less risk
We are installing a z10 this weekend with z/VM 5.4. My question is what
are my migration options for migration to z/VM 6.1? I don't suppose
that 6.1 can run under 5.4, since 6.1 requires a z10+ and 5.4 does not?
(If so, problem solved. Otherwise it looks I'll be limited to 1. LPAR
the z/VM
on the APARs for z10 and wait for 6.2
Frank M. Ramaekers framaek...@ailife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/14/2010 11:17 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
z10 and z/VM 6.1
:17 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
z10 and z/VM 6.1
We are installing a z10 this weekend with z/VM 5.4. My question is what
are my migration options for migration to z/VM 6.1? I don’t suppose that
6.1 can
On 10/14/10 12:15 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
5.4 has a longer TTL than 6.1.
6.1 does not have that much more functionality.
Why would anyone go to a higher release that has a shorter expiration and not
much more functionality?
One extenuating reason is that
.
Holding out for 6.2 or whatever his number ends up being,
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z10 and z/VM 6.1
I haven't tried it, but 6.1 should run as a guest of 5.4 on a z10 (or
later.) z/VM does not hide or downgrade the architecture of the machine
from the guest (as much as possible), so the machine features needed by 6.1
should still be available to a guest of 5.4 on a z10.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at
On 10/14/10 1:13 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Tested what upgrade path? There's an upgrade path?!
There's usually a description of installing the new system 2nd level in CP
Planning and Admin. That's normally what I think of as the upgrade path.
Also, other places in
We've tried it and 6.1 will run as a guest of 5.4 on a z10..
If you're swinging all your DASD over to the z10 - you could just bring up
z/VM 5.4 -- build your 2nd level 6.1 guest - merge and migrate and bring up
6.1 1st level...
Scott rohling
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruce Hayden
isn't listening.
Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/14/2010 01:27 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z10 and z/VM 6.1
We've tried
SPEs early though
and tested them extensively.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:45 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z10 and z/VM 6.1
We've tried it and 6.1 will run
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z10 and z/VM 6.1
On 10/14/10 1:13 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Tested what upgrade path? There's an upgrade path?!
There's usually a description of installing the new system 2nd level in
CP
Planning and Admin. That's
12 matches
Mail list logo
