NSF has a ton of information on this for the U.S. population. I'm too lazy
right now to dig it up, but it is there.
On May 1, 2012, at 4:40 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
There have been some good numbers floated on recent threads, but at least for
me, they aren't enough to gain a complete (or
A good URL for the NSF statistics:
http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
Also, there's extensive information and analysis about the
educational pipeline in the US (for all groups, and including K12) in
the 2010 American Association of University Women report Why So Few?
From: Allison Mankin [allison.man...@gmail.com]
I'd be interested to learn of studies of the CS workforce outside the
US. Are there recruitment and attrition problems everywhere?
I've seen reports in the popular press that the fraction of women
entering software is higher in many Asian
Phillip,
I haven't seen any consensus for the change of the document, thus
chairs think the document is fine as it is.
Ondrej
On 25. 4. 2012, at 15:52, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
I have raised these comments in the WG numerous times, I am raising
them here as I do not believe that anyone is
--On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 19:07 -0800 Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/1/12 5:55 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
What would be good patterns for those roles?
I don't know what John has in mind but it strikes me that every
so often we get a wave of new participants (as
+1
I'm still a little concerned about the boundary between media
(content) -type and content-transfer-encoding, but I've become
convinced that we should not put the burden of that issue onto
this document.
I do believe that, someday, someone should try to write up an
up-to-date description of
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
But, even a step or two in the direction of promoting or preferring
less-able women in order to make IETF bodies more diverse would be
likely to result in shooting ourselves in our collective feet.
I think the analysis
--On Friday, May 04, 2012 11:01 -0700 Ted Hardie
ted.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, John C Klensin
john-i...@jck.com wrote:
But, even a step or two in the direction of promoting or
preferring less-able women in order to make IETF bodies more
diverse would be
I do believe that, someday, someone should try to write up an
up-to-date description of the difference that recognizes the
fact that compressed files are in use as media types with
application/zip (in assorted spellings) and application/gzip
(from this spec and in assorted spellings) as examples.
Hi John,
At 10:43 04-05-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
garb on a regular basis is unreasonable. So, unless we want to
send the message that all of the senior members of the community
are necessarily male (and inclined to grow beards), we need to
find another term.
The term SIR was proposed
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi PHB,
the IETF is not like an enterprise where you can decide (as part of the
hiring process) what characteristics your employees should have.
True, but that does not mean that you should decide that there
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi PHB,
the IETF is not like an enterprise where you can decide (as part of the
hiring process) what characteristics your employees
I do believe that, someday, someone should try to write up an
up-to-date description of the difference that recognizes the
fact that compressed files are in use as media types with
application/zip (in assorted spellings) and application/gzip
(from this spec and in assorted spellings) as
--On Friday, May 04, 2012 19:26 -0700 Ned Freed
ned.fr...@mrochek.com wrote:
You're right, it would be nice if there were some way to
distinguish containers from content in MIME types. But given
the existing historical mess, and that some kinds of
compression are just a different way to
On May 5, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi PHB,
the IETF is not like an enterprise where you can decide (as part of
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'SHA-2 Data Integrity Verification for the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport
Layer Protocol'
(draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-06.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The SIDR working group will hold an interim meeting (plus virtual
attendance) on June 6th 2012.
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Time: 0900 - 1700 PDT
Agenda and dial-in information will be posted to the mailing list and
will also be available at: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/trac/wiki
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'An IANA registry for Level of Assurance (LoA) Profiles'
(draft-johansson-loa-registry-06.txt) as Informational RFC
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The IESG contact person is Sean
Please note updated meeting time below.
The SIDR working group will hold an interim meeting (plus virtual
attendance) on June 6th 2012.
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Time: 1300-1700 PDT
Agenda and dial-in information will be posted to the mailing list and
will also be available at:
Hi Folks,
A face-to-face interim meeting is being scheduled for the CLUE WG. The
date and location were selected to allow participants to also attend the
W3C WebRTC and IETF RTCWEB meetings the following week.
Date: June 7-8, 2012
Location: Kista (near Stockholm) Sweden. Exact location will be
20 matches
Mail list logo
