--On 12. juli 2004 12:55 -0400 Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it has been pointed out to you that you have the ability to
communicate with Rob Austein using the mail address that is posted
on the ietf dnsop charter web page:
As Chairman Alvestrand has clearly stated, IETF email
This page lists his old address. Mr. Austein's current address (as can be
seen from the DNSOP archives) is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email address does not receive email from Av8 Internet or any of its
customers due to Rob's (and hence the IETF's) participation in an unlawful
Funny that: if you don't recognize the statements, why don't you clearly
state that is appropriate to make complaints on-list and refute those who
ask for such complaints to be made offlist? Complaints _should_ be made
offlist.
Myself, Dan Bernstein, and I think others have been chastised for
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, David Kessens wrote:
Dean,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:19:20AM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
P.S. I am still blocked from emailing DNS WG chair, and prevented from
registering complaint about improper DNS WG RFC process activity by ISC
and DNS WG chair Austein,
Dean,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:55:07PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dnsop-charter.html
Yes, I've read this carefully.
Did you really ? If you did, you would have found a mail address of
Rob Austein that you can use to send him mail.
David Kessens
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:56:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Procmail filtering on 'From:|To:|cc:' is easy enough. There's probably
a way to get Procmail to snarf up the Message-Id: header for the sender's
posting, and then look for that msgid in any References: or In-Reply-To:
This is interesting, as it goes against the current phishing trends
that
tend to produce ultra-realistic baits; maybe it's not necessary to
spend
all the time copying the target's logos and mimicking their fonts and
style after all. Good ol' tricks still work.
Indeed. But this isn't a
Michel Py wrote:
This is interesting, as it goes against the current
phishing trends that tend to produce ultra-realistic
baits; maybe it's not necessary to spend all the time
copying the target's logos and mimicking their fonts
and style after all. Good ol' tricks still work.
Harley David
Tim Chown
Oh, you can filter out any sender easily enough. The snag
is you see all the replies people send to their mailings :(
Indeed.
Michel.
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:10:57 PDT, Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tim Chown
Oh, you can filter out any sender easily enough. The snag
is you see all the replies people send to their mailings :(
Indeed.
Procmail filtering on 'From:|To:|cc:' is easy enough. There's probably
a way to
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:38:01 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized access.
Our virus scanners are still nailing some 30K Bagles a week. Are there
really people net.clued enough to be subscribed to the IETF list, but
with so few
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trang
NguyenSent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:57 PMTo: Sean
Weekes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Email account
utilization warning.
Same
with me. Please don't cut us off without reasonable
explanation.
Regards
]
Subject: RE: Email account utilization warning.
Please can you reinstate my account or at least explain in more detail the reason
for your actions here.
I'm not happy that you arbitrarily undertake this course of action without prior
notification or discussion.
I also am at a loss
] On Behalf Of Jasen Strutt
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:02 PM
To: 'Trang Nguyen'; 'Sean Weekes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Email account utilization warning.
Did anyone take mention of the virus infected file that was attached to the email? Did anyone take mention
Bill wrote:
You would think this crowd is used to Joe Jobs and Phishing.
Nah. Even if the scheme is crude and/or rudimentary and almost nobody
(except secretariat/staff) actually has an IETF e-mail account, it still
works.
This is interesting, as it goes against the current phishing trends
] On Behalf Of Dean
Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:34 AM
To: Mark Durham
Cc: Michel Py; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Email account utilization warning.
Mark,
To fool people, the phish has to be plausible. In this case, people
have come to expect capricious behavior
I wonder how hard it would be to set my mail server to drop your mail
too? Since, obviously, Email account utilization warning has nothing
to do with your rants. . .
-Dave
On Wednesday, 07 Jul 2004, Dean Anderson wrote:
Mark,
To fool people, the phish has to be plausible. In this case
account utilization warning.
Because I have respect for the IETF, and its principles. It is the IETF
leadership that is disgraceful.
But it has been the desire of the leadership to run the IETF like a
private club, and many people would be (and have been) driven off by
their behavior. Someone
Dean,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:19:20AM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
P.S. I am still blocked from emailing DNS WG chair, and prevented from
registering complaint about improper DNS WG RFC process activity by ISC
and DNS WG chair Austein, because the IETF chairman Alvestrand demands
that
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Email account utilization warning.
Mark,
To fool people, the phish has to be plausible. In this case, people
have come to expect capricious behavior from the IETF and so the
phishing claim of turning off email capriciously isn't out of the realm
From: Jasen Strutt
Would you give it a rest already? Take your issue(s) up with the appropriate
person(s) in a separate, mutually exclusive thread, and stop blasting the
IETF list.
I would rather not offend you, but please consider that good advice.
Please do not respond to those whose
.
As I said offlist to Mark Smith:
From: Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Email account utilization warning.
Because I have respect for the IETF, and its principles. It is the IETF
leadership that is disgraceful.
But it has
Dear user of Ietf.org,
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized access.
For more information see the attached file.
Kind regards,
The Ietf.org team http://www.ietf.org
[Filename: Text.pif, Content-Type: application/octet-stream]
The attachment
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:08
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Email account utilization
warning.
Dear user of Ietf.org,
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized access.
For more
PROTECTED]
Subject: Email account utilization warning.
Dear user of Ietf.org,
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized
access.
For more information see the attached file.
Kind regards,
The Ietf.org team http://www.ietf.org
.
Regards.Sean
Weekes
General Manager, ICONZ
www.iconz.co.nz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, 6 July 2004 7:08
p.m.To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Email account utilization
warning.
Dear user of Ietf.org,Your e-mail account has
account utilization
warning.
Please can you reinstate my account or at least explain
in more detail the reason for your actions here.
I'm not happy that you arbitrarily undertake this course
of action without prior notification or discussion.
I also am at a loss as to why you have
and blasting the IETF list.
Regards-
Jasen
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trang
Nguyen
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:57
PM
To: Sean Weekes; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Email account
utilization warning.
Same
Remain
calm members,
Its a
bogus email.
Its
not from the IETF..
Someone is just having fun with the IETF email
list...
John
Buda
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
'; 'Sean Weekes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Email account utilization warning.
Did anyone take mention of the virus infected file that was attached to the email?
Did anyone take mention that the header information is junk? I hope spam and phishing
are not foreign terms
30 matches
Mail list logo
