On 12/9/2022 9:25 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Yeah, your own website. Sorry if I don't give this any credence.
I thought you were insisting that ad hominems stop.
In any event, the reference is to a list of factual comparisons. They
are objectively true or false.
Feel free to focus on substan
On Fri 09/Dec/2022 16:47:47 +0100 Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/8/22 5:17 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Those who do so are neatly classified as spammers.
On one hand I agree. But on the other hand I disagree.
One benign case is that webmas...@example.com is configured to forward to
al...@exampl
> Interesting bit from what appears to be the original draft charter,
> circulated at the DKIM BOF, November 2005:
>
> > The DKIM working group will produce specifications
> > that permit authentication of message headers during transit,
DKIM signature headers have effectively become a type of log
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:49 AM Grant Taylor
wrote:
>
> A slightly less benign case was years ago when I was dealing with an AOL
> sender and AOL had no interest in doing anything to stop the sender. So
> I configured a forwarder to take messages from the sender, add them as
> an attachment to a m
On 12/10/22 4:31 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 12/9/2022 9:25 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Yeah, your own website. Sorry if I don't give this any credence.
I thought you were insisting that ad hominems stop.
In any event, the reference is to a list of factual comparisons. They
are objectively tr
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> I wish that certain widely used distribution list software could do the
> same.
So you admit that most mailing lists are not compatible with an enforcing
DMARC, so my original point stands.
It's a bit annoying that after almost two weeks, the only re
On 12/10/2022 5:04 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
But that was evident from the beginning with you telling us that you
know better what was in our heads then we did.
Michael, I didn't do any such thing. That is one of a number of
interpretations that you've invented.
I made some first-person as
On 12/10/2022 5:04 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
What point you are trying to make belittling our contribution
DKIM is objectively an evolution of DomainKeys. The list I cited that
evaluated differences between DomainKeys and DKIM serves to make that
pretty clear.
I think that history is worth
