On Sat, 07 May 2011 13:50:41 +0100, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it
wrote:
On 06/May/11 20:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL
result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present
in the message. ...
On 06/May/11 20:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL
result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present
in the message. ...
s/Verifiers SHOULD ignore/Identity assessors SHOULD ignore/
(and probably in other
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:08 PM
To: Charles Lindsey
Cc: DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements
+ Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures
+ Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL
+ result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present in
+ the message. ...
s/Verifiers SHOULD ignore/Identity assessors SHOULD ignore/
(and probably in other places too). Veriffiers are explicitly
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:39:03 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy
m...@cloudmark.com wrote:
Right before Section 6:
+ Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL
+ result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present in
+ the message. ...
s/Verifiers SHOULD
Here's a more comprehensive proposal for an output summary (excuse the diff
output):
+4.9. Output Requirements
+
+ For each signature that verifies successfully or produces a TEMPFAIL
+ result, the output of a DKIM verifier module MUST include the set of:
+
+ o The domain name, taken
On 29/Apr/11 19:39, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Here’s a more comprehensive proposal for an output summary (excuse the
“diff” output):
+4.9. Output Requirements
+
+ For each signature that verifies successfully or produces a TEMPFAIL
+ result, the output of a DKIM verifier module MUST
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:03 PM
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements
How about mentioning ignored signatures
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:18 PM
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements
-Original Message-
From: ietf
On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org]
On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:03 PM
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output
10 matches
Mail list logo