hi
can anyone who has used both moinmoin and mediawiki give a heads up on
the comparative performance of the two - i am interested in ease of
use for the end user, security and configurability. Yes, i have
STFWed, but would like to have an opinion from the practical point of
view
--
regards
On Wednesday, 31 Aug 2005 12:25 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
hi
can anyone who has used both moinmoin and mediawiki give a heads up on
the comparative performance of the two - i am interested in ease of
use for the end user, security and configurability. Yes, i have
STFWed, but would like to
On Wednesday, 31 Aug 2005 12:25 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
hi
can anyone who has used both moinmoin and mediawiki give a heads up on
the comparative performance of the two - i am interested in ease of
use for the end user, security and configurability. Yes, i have
STFWed, but would like to
On Wednesday 31 Aug 2005 1:26 pm, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 Aug 2005 12:25 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
hi
can anyone who has used both moinmoin and mediawiki give a heads
up on the comparative performance of the two - i am interested in
ease of use for the end user,
The messages's content type was not explicitly allowed
Just guessing - are you trying to send HTML mail, or probably sending
out an attachment with the mail?
Nandz.
--
http://nandz.blogspot.com
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Kenneth == Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kenneth On Wednesday 31 Aug 2005 1:26 pm, Sandip Bhattacharya
Kenneth wrote: On Wednesday, 31 Aug 2005 12:25 pm, Kenneth
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: hi can anyone who has used both
Kenneth moinmoin and mediawiki give a heads
in infinite wisdom Sandip Bhattacharya spoke thus on 08/31/05 13:26:
Besides mediawiki being based on sql is probably going to scale better than
moin which is flat file on disk based. This also means that moin is easier to
backup, but that is not too big a point for moin.
- Sandi
I
At 2005-08-31 16:31:35 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude, please fix your quoting and formatting. I haven't been able to
read a single mail by you to the list so far!
That's... weird. They've all looked fine to me.
-- ams
___
ilugd mailinglist
Nope have made it plain text
but sometimes I do cut and paste stuff ???
but not in the last two mails that bounced
ram
Saurabh Nanda wrote:
The messages's content type was not explicitly allowed
Just guessing - are you trying to send HTML mail, or probably sending
out an attachment with
On Wednesday 31 Aug 2005 4:31 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
Dude, please fix your quoting and formatting. I haven't been
able to read a single mail by you to the list so far!
nothing wrong with my quoting and formatting. The problem is that i
have tamil/kannada in my sig. This apparently messes up
On 8/31/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received some password protected Microcost Offyce (c) power point - ppt
files. I don't have the passwords but it is supposed to be opened as
read only.
Open Office does not even get to asking for the pass word it gives the
following
I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one direction
only and i want to configure it bidirection..
any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can any one help me in this issue...
--
Manish Popli
___
ilugd mailinglist --
--- Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 30 Aug 2005 10:35 pm, vivek khurana
wrote:
Thanks Keneth.
These logos were made using Inkscape, touched up
using Gimp, webpage was created using bluefish,
uploaded to website using gftp, hosted on a linux
based server,
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 19:13, Manish Popli wrote:
I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one direction
only and i want to configure it bidirection..
any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can any one help me in this issue...
I have some advice that you won't like:
Don't
On Wednesday 31 Aug 2005 10:01 pm, vivek khurana wrote:
this should be mentioned somewhere on the page as it
is a good
advertisement for floss - btw, it appears that the
masthead graphic
is made in photoshop - could you check out and
rectify if necessary?
Good idea Keneth, will do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am getting this message for a few posts that I made
The messages's content type was not explicitly allowed
Check the email headers. Most mailing list softwares put a reason on
why the mail was rejected in the headers.
--
Raj Shekhar
wat do u mean ??
On 9/1/05, Sirtaj Singh Kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 19:13, Manish Popli wrote:
I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one
direction
only and i want to configure it bidirection..
any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can
On Thursday 01 Sep 2005 10:37 am, Manish Popli wrote:
wat do u mean ??
what he means is that there are many packages for version control.
The first and most widespread was CVS. CVS has many limitations and
will not be able to do what was required by the OP. A package like
subversion, which
Hi
This is the message in the header
(gmail.com: 204.74.68.40 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record
for domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED])
any ideas how this could be rectified
ram
Raj Shekhar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am getting this message for a few posts that
19 matches
Mail list logo
