Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[about me saying that Linus needs to ensure GPL compatible code]
Huh? How so? You are now making a claim that has not been voiced so
far, namely that this is somehow in violation of the GPL.
Linus is committed to GPL V2 for the kernel. So he is obliged
On Monday 02 Jun 2008, PJ wrote:
[snip]
I think it is a GPL violation since a decent coder can't figure out
how to modify the disputed code that is distributed with the kernel,
unlike the original coder. So there is no way you can say it is a
preferred form of source in the GPL sense for the
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 07:33:14 + (UTC)
PJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[about me saying that Linus needs to ensure GPL compatible code]
Huh? How so? You are now making a claim that has not been voiced so
far, namely that this is somehow in violation
Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some people (including me) are neutral to code that doesn't run on their
primary processor. For instance, I'd complain if you gave me a
non-free driver for my WiFi card, but I wouldn't if you gave me a free
driver that downloads a binary blob to the
Todays Hindu Bangalore edition carries an interview with Jesse James
Garrett and a quote from the article about Free Software:
And what does a self-made man like him think about the Free Software
movement? Tell me if my metaphor makes sense, he says, as he
proceeds to compare it to a large ball
Todays Hindu Bangalore edition carries an interview with Jesse James
Garrett and a quote from the article about Free Software:
And what does a self-made man like him think about the Free Software
movement? Tell me if my metaphor makes sense, he says, as he
proceeds to compare it to a large ball
On Monday 02 Jun 2008, PJ wrote:
Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some people (including me) are neutral to code that doesn't run on
their primary processor. For instance, I'd complain if you gave me
a non-free driver for my WiFi card, but I wouldn't if you gave me a
free driver that
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, arun singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..Problem in running videos
HI
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 .I have installed every AV player viz. VLC,mplayer
Kaffeine,xmms and others but i am unable to run the videos. some blurred
images and intermingling lines
On Mon, June 2, 2008 3:30 pm, arun singh wrote:
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 .I have installed every AV player viz. VLC,mplayer
Kaffeine,xmms and others but i am unable to run the videos. some blurred
images and intermingling lines appears whenever i runs the videos.
i have tried to install almost
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, arun singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..Problem in running videos
HI
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 .I have installed every AV player viz. VLC,mplayer
Kaffeine,xmms and others but i am unable to run the videos. some blurred
images and intermingling lines
..Problem in running videos
HI
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 .I have installed every AV player viz. VLC,mplayer
Kaffeine,xmms and others but i am unable to run the videos. some blurred
images and intermingling lines appears whenever i runs the videos.
i have tried to install almost every
On Monday 02 Jun 2008, Gora Mohanty wrote:
[snip]
Not so. As I understand it various portions of the kernel are
released under various licences, and it is possible to have
something like this under the GPLv2.
Er, no -- the whole kernel is GPLv2, and Linus has refused to migrate it
to GPLv3
guys the situation is like this:
1. I had a XP installed on my C: but it got corrupted sometime back,but i
needed some data on the desktop.
2. so i installed another XP on D:,thus having a option to boot from either
of the two windows(one corrupt)
3. now i formatted C: and installed fedora core
aashish khanna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5. but during the boot on selecting the other it shows
rootnoverify(hd0,4)
chainloader +1
What is the problem with this? Did you actually try booting from that
entry? I have a
this is not a entry...the screen just shows these two lines and nothing
else...no option to boot,no progress.nothing
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Mahesh T. Pai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aashish khanna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5. but during the boot on selecting the other it shows
Friends.
In the Free Open Source Software world, a lot of things are happening daily.
We the Open Source lovers know them from a lot of sources.
Linux User Groups,
Digg, SlashDot and other news sites,
Various Blogs, forums etc,
Our Friends, Fossers.
But what about the other people, who do not
aashish khanna writes:
aashish guys the situation is like this:
aashish 1. I had a XP installed on my C: but it got corrupted sometime
back,but i
aashish needed some data on the desktop.
aashish 2. so i installed another XP on D:,thus having a option to boot
from either
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Send ilugd mailing list submissions to
ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
or, via email, send a message with subject or
does that mean i'll have to re-install XP?? but i guess even that won't make
a difference becoz GRUB still won't recognize it. i want to keep the XP on
D: and Fedora on C: and want a dual boot.
the GRUB loader at the time of installation detected other OS as well
aashish on hda5 and it was
On Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 11:11:32PM -0400, aashish khanna wrote:
does that mean i'll have to re-install XP?? but i guess even that won't make
a difference becoz GRUB still won't recognize it. i want to keep the XP on
D: and Fedora on C: and want a dual boot.
Firstly, there's no concept of C: and
20 matches
Mail list logo
