On Saturday 04 Oct 2008, Vikas Rawal wrote:
[snip]
5. I have both ubuntu 8.04 and debian lenny installed on the
system. They share /home, and therefore, much of the gnome
configuration files. With the same configuration, Debian's default
appearance seems ugly in comparison with ubuntu. In
2008/10/3 M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear Praveen,
Thank you for participating in the debate.Are you educating the open
FOSS community that any body can club all individual GPL software into
one Mega software collection under one umbrella using anaconda or Yum
which is
You could try changing the screen resolution and see if that helps. If
your resolution is set to 120 dpi you will get huge fonts.
[snip]
To sum, so far, debian lenny has worked much better on this machine
than ubuntu 8.04 did. There are a few minor issues with the debian
Dear Shantanu Goel,
Thank you and I respect your debating
skills.
This is debate happening. You all are
experts can guide your fellow Linux users.
Praveen,is teaching the open FOSS
community that any body can club all individual GPL
Yatnatti -
Hi. I cannot help but be bewildered by your discussions on the
legality of distributing Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Red Hat (note the
two words), puts every bit of code out on GPL. In fact, Red Hat
goes above and beyond the minimum needed for compliance
with the GPL by placing all
Hi All on ILugD, Praveen, Sudhanwa, Shantz, Harish, et al,
Guys, this guy is a troll-- dont feed the troll.
After making my post I saw his websites--- and googled around--- and saw
that the OP is a troll of the worst kind-- see his websites and even you
guys will realize that.
He has even
Dear Harish PIllay
I am educating myself about four kinds of freedom, for the users of the
software as per GPL .Freedom number two Redhat does not want to give user
for RHEL Linux Distribution .The
freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour (freedom
2).
Hi,
I assume that MSY is a troll but still going ahead and adding in the
thread as the discussion is useful for many people who are not so
clear about this whole thing.
MSY,
Please understand the difference between Trade Marks, software
licenses, Free software , commercial software, proprietory
Hi All,
@Sudhanwa:
Thanks- your message is very enlightening and came while I was drafting this
mail.
Perhaps even I will now sign off from discussion (or perhaps not!!!)
@MSY:
Please note that we can discuss on the subject.Personal attacks don't solve
the the debate.
Respected Mr.MSY,
I have
Dear Nalin Savara,
Please note that we can discuss on the subject.Personal attacks don't solve the
the debate.Please note that Linux users are already discussing the issues.If
you are not interested don't participate in the discussion. Linux For You
India has already published an article Is
Dear Sudhanwa,
OK you are only experts .Hats off for your comments.But our debate will contiue
untill we get answer. proper answer.Why you threaten the innocent persons
instead of Guiding .it is not good sign of Linux users group .It is debate and
discussion.Many persons have many questions
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:18:06 M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote:
skip
Dear Mr. M.S.Yatnatti,
I understand many have tried to answer your query. Let me try once again: The
answer why you can't redistribute RHEL is only because of the branding issues.
The full RH sources are available
Dear Mr Atanu,
I am thankful for your cool reply.Please provide me the link where GPL provides
branding of GPLed software's..
At the same time please provide me what happens to four freedoms guaranteed in
GPL at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.Out
of four one about redistribution is
Yatnatti -
I am educating myself about four kinds of freedom, for the users of the
software as per GPL
.Freedom number two Redhat does not want to give user for RHEL Linux
Distribution .The
freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour (freedom 2).
Since you are eager
M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote:
Dear Mr Atanu,
I am thankful for your cool reply.Please provide me the link where GPL
provides branding of GPLed software's..
At the same time please provide me what happens to four freedoms guaranteed
in GPL at
Flash Player Worries Privacy Advocates
Macromedia's Flash media player is raising concerns among privacy
advocates for its little-known ability to store computer users'
personal information and assign a unique identifier to
M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote:
Dear Harish PIllay
I am educating myself about four kinds of freedom, for the users of the
software as per GPL .Freedom number two Redhat does not want to give user
for RHEL Linux Distribution .The
freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your
Dear Karanji,I don't understand why you want suppress the open voices .Do you
think that only few people have eligibility to talk on the subject.Others have
no authority to discuss any thing.If LUG has any predefined regulations let me
M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD wrote:
Dear Karanji,I don't understand why you want suppress the open voices .
You seem to also suffer comprehension disabilities if thats what you
infer from my last email.
Do you think that only few people have eligibility to talk on the
subject.Others have
Karanbir Singh wrote:
You are wrongly assuming that rhel is made up of GPL software. Go check
your facts.
s/of G/of only G/
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
