On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010, Vikas Rawal wrote:
> > But the less than 80 character wide limitation isn't a limitation
> > set by our body it was a limitation set by the older displays.
>
> Reading wide displays is surely more difficult that reading shorter
> width displays. This, as far as I know, is
> But the less than 80 character wide limitation isn't a limitation
> set by our body it was a limitation set by the older displays.
>
Reading wide displays is surely more difficult that reading shorter
width displays. This, as far as I know, is a well accepted fact in
publishing industry.
Imag
From: Raj Mathur
> difference to me, at least. For instance, when coding I make lines < 80
> characters anyway (split longer ones across multiple lines), so taller
But the less than 80 character wide limitation isn't a limitation set by our
body it was a limitation set by the older displays
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
[...]
> [off-topic]
> Thanks to unreasonable men, we got multicore CPUs, and thanks to reasonable
> men, we got optimization manuals.
> [/off-topic]
That is possibly one of the best dual supportive statement I have heard. :D
Kudos!
---
n998
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raj Mathur writes:
[...]
> Paraphrasing G B Shaw a bit, The reasonable man adapts himself to his
> environment, while the unreasonable one insists on adapting his
> environment to his needs. Hence all progress depends on the
> unreasonable man.
On Tuesday 13 Apr 2010, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> From: Vikas Rawal
>
> > With wide-screen monitors, I end up wasting a lot of screen space
> > even when I am only word processing on something like openoffice.
> > In a 4:3 monitor, one could see a lot more of the page.
>
> I am not sure what
From: Vikas Rawal
> With wide-screen monitors, I end up wasting a lot of screen space even
> when I am only word processing on something like openoffice. In a 4:3
> monitor, one could see a lot more of the page.
I am not sure what is the big deal with widesc
> Imagine editing a word document in 1080X1920.. portrait mode :)
Won't it be great? We can see a whole page!!
Vikas
___
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Imagine editing a word document in 1080X1920.. portrait mode :)
-Angad
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Vikas Rawal wrote:
>>
>> As an aside, monitors designed only to view HD movies suck big-time.
>> Don't coders and techies use monitors anymore?
>
> With wide-screen monitors, I end up wasting a l
>
> As an aside, monitors designed only to view HD movies suck big-time.
> Don't coders and techies use monitors anymore?
With wide-screen monitors, I end up wasting a lot of screen space even
when I am only word processing on something like openoffice. In a 4:3
monitor, one could see a lot more
On Tuesday 13 Apr 2010, Angad Singh wrote:
> Portrait is available in Dell 2408WFP.
At Rs 35,000? Phew, the specs look good but a gold-plated monitor is
slightly out of my budget at the moment!
-- Raju
--
Raj Mathurr...@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
GPG: 78D4
Portrait is available in Dell 2408WFP.
-Angad
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Nandeep Mali wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 Apr 2010, Vivek Kapoor wrote:
> [...]
> >> As a last resort I went to Dell site. They gave me a quote of Rs.
> >> 21000 for
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 Apr 2010, Vivek Kapoor wrote:
[...]
>> As a last resort I went to Dell site. They gave me a quote of Rs.
>> 21000 for a 21" 1600x1200 monitor. Not sure if they still sell it.
My guess is that it must be the IPS monitors. They are
On Tuesday 13 Apr 2010, Vivek Kapoor wrote:
> On 04/13/2010 11:47 AM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> I had also searched a lot, but only the cheapo monitors are available
> in Nehru Place and no 1600x1200 is available. They refer to it as
> "square" monitors and say that they've stopped coming long time ba
14 matches
Mail list logo
