Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 18 Jan 2008, pj wrote: > [snip] > Then Mary said ebox (http://www.ebox-platform.com/) is > pretty much ready for real use. Bonus for you Raj: perl and mason > front-ends. Hooray! > > (Well, anything will be better than my heroic abuse of webserving > with bash shell scripts for a primitiv

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:40:26PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: [...] | i am using opendns servers - but still if an ISP goes down the dns | gets b0rked That's probably because you need to switch gateways. | > | > Also you a simple worka

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread pj
Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was fooling > around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both the new and the > existing (MTNL) links. It's working now, and on some applications I'm > getting up to 512Kb/s speeds

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:09:56PM +0530, Raj Mathur wrote: [...] | Ah, I hadn't checked out that part of things and was under the | impression that load balancing won't work if you have a single | interface. If you can confirm that you can d

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 18-Jan-08, at 1:33 PM, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote: > How about using a recursive nameserver instead of using forwarder ? > Even if you've to rely on forwarders (probably because of your IP > being > blacklisted in RBLs and couple of DNS servers not responding to you), > you can use pub

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-18 Thread आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:15:41PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: [...] | I use shorewall multiisp for load balancing with 3 ISPs through | eth1, eth2 and eth3 with the lan on eth0. Works fine but the moment | one ISP goes down, the dns ac

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 18-Jan-08, at 1:07 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: >>> http://wiki.kandalaya.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/LoadBalancing >> >> what happens if one interface goes down - does it screw up the dns? > > Well, it screws up half your connections. The commands I've given are > for a rudimentary setup: no dead g

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Jan 18, 2008 1:07 PM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | OTOH, if one interface goes down you can always | | /etc/init.d/networking restart \-- Or use fail-over to use the other connection line: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt My reference documentation: http://www.shakthimaan.c

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 18 Jan 2008, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote: > [snip] > http://wiki.kandalaya.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/LoadBalancing > Quoting from above URL: > - >8>8Multiple routers > If both your ISP modems are in router mode, you may have issues > getting loadbalancing to work. This is

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 18 Jan 2008, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 18-Jan-08, at 11:54 AM, Raj Mathur wrote: > > Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was > > fooling around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both the new > > and the existing (MTNL) links. It's working now, and on some >

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:09:53PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: | | On 18-Jan-08, at 11:54 AM, Raj Mathur wrote: | | > Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was fooling | > around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:54:39AM +0530, Raj Mathur wrote: | Hi, | | Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was fooling | around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both the new and the | existing (MTNL) links. It's worki

Re: [ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 18-Jan-08, at 11:54 AM, Raj Mathur wrote: > Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was fooling > around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both the new and the > existing (MTNL) links. It's working now, and on some applications I'm > getting up to 512Kb/s speeds over my

[ilugd] Load balancing with multiple ISPs

2008-01-17 Thread Raj Mathur
Hi, Got myself a second Internet link (Airtel) yesterday and was fooling around trying to get traffic multiplexed over both the new and the existing (MTNL) links. It's working now, and on some applications I'm getting up to 512Kb/s speeds over my 2 256Kb/s connections. Have documented the pr