Quoting G Karunakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > 2. Second and more important one is there are all types of people in the
> > list, Gurus, Intermediate and Novice. Its good to have Gurus on the list
> > but what could happen to list if they start behaving arrogant? I am not
> > talking about this
On 6/3/07, Yashpal Nagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All is ok, what you are saying, there are only two concerns.
>
> 1. How does the people behave when they see someone's post in the
> mailing list, for which the answer might be very obvious or the
> respondent feels, why this silly question is
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Yashpal Nagar wrote:
>
>> I don't know how is the redhat
>> support in India but in UK it is not so.
>>
>
> I dont agree :) We work with Redhat people onsite ( in the UK ) and even on
> remote setups - and i can assure you, they are some of the best techies to
> h
On 6/1/07, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:25 +0100, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> [...]
>
> I will refrain from responding to these arguments, as people have
> done so at length.
>
> > What i feel is ok, you take support from Redhat/SUSE but at the same
> > time, a pers
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:25 +0100, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
[...]
I will refrain from responding to these arguments, as people have
done so at length.
> What i feel is ok, you take support from Redhat/SUSE but at the same
> time, a person should't loose his right to discuss such problems in
> publi
Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> I don't know how is the redhat
> support in India but in UK it is not so.
I dont agree :) We work with Redhat people onsite ( in the UK ) and even on
remote setups - and i can assure you, they are some of the best techies to have
on your side when things break :)
Also, t
Gora Mohanty wrote:
> I would like to say that it should be incumbent on people asking for help to
> first
> exhaust easier avenues. FOSS support is a perennial problem, and
> if you have paid for the RHEL OS, you should demand quality support
> from Redhat. After all, you have paid *them* money,
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:35 +0100, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
[...]
> You reply is oppressive, I dont' know how newbies feel...
I don't know about "oppressive", because I have no more of a
special right on this list, as compared to anyone else. However,
you are right in that this was an unhelpful, off-t
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> RedHat tripped up on support and make that available to Red Hat (with
> ticket # etc)
>
> Meanwhile, http://www.redhat.com/magazine/009jul05/features/multilib/ is
> perhaps what you are looking at.
>
>
> It would be nice feedback if you could take up instances of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> do you think that you have told a new idea to the subscriber of Redhat
> to ask from Redhat ? Redhat support i feel is not that easy/informatice
> as you think. It is most likely that you end up speaking to a person who
> is
Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:23 +0100, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
>
>> Hi list
>>
>> On a RHEL 4.0 , 64bit OS, I have noticed that few of the
>>
>^^^ I do believe that Redhat paid support is
> just around the corner.
>
Thanks gora for your email.
do
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:23 +0100, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> Hi list
>
> On a RHEL 4.0 , 64bit OS, I have noticed that few of the
^^^ I do believe that Redhat paid support is
just around the corner.
> for libraries etc are same for 32bit arch and 64 bit in rpm database
[...]
Hi list
On a RHEL 4.0 , 64bit OS, I have noticed that few of the
for libraries etc are same for 32bit arch and 64 bit in rpm database.
e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# rpm -qa|grep xorg-x11-devel
xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.18
xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.18
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# rpm -qa|grep xorg-x11-
13 matches
Mail list logo
