On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:37:37 +0530
Anupam Jain ajn...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
An example of accidental access would be when some employee
donates a computer to a third party but forgets to erase the HDD.
Even in this case the finder does not automatically get the rights
that the owner had.
You
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Raj Mathurr...@linux-delhi.org wrote:
On Friday 28 Aug 2009, Anupam Jain wrote:
However I wonder about the proprietary compiler itself. if it's based
on GCC, it needs to be licensed under GPL, even if it's distributed
in-house. So any developer who works for
Gora Mohanty g...@... writes:
[ about my question about the MIPS binaries, which are distributed generally]
I doubt that there is any problem there. As per my understanding, it
is perfectly legal to compile proprietary software using gcc.
Wikipedia
Nalin Savara nsn...@... writes:
[about Nalin's work:]
This is a proprietary compiler based on gcc-- which compiles to generate
code targetted at a MIPS microprocessor used in a consumer electronics
device.
Going off on a tangent to the main debate:
The compiler can be proprietary if you
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:56:51 + (UTC)
Pawan pee...@hotpop.com wrote:
Nalin Savara nsn...@... writes:
[about Nalin's work:]
This is a proprietary compiler based on gcc-- which compiles to
generate code targetted at a MIPS microprocessor used in a
consumer electronics device.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Pawanpee...@hotpop.com wrote:
Nalin Savara nsn...@... writes:
[about Nalin's work:]
This is a proprietary compiler based on gcc-- which compiles to generate
code targetted at a MIPS microprocessor used in a consumer electronics
device.
Going off on a
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:56:12 +0530
Anupam Jain ajn...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
However I wonder about the proprietary compiler itself. if it's
based on GCC, it needs to be licensed under GPL, even if it's
distributed in-house.
It is a stretch to call that distribution.
So
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Gora Mohantyg...@sarai.net wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:56:12 +0530
Anupam Jain ajn...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
However I wonder about the proprietary compiler itself. if it's
based on GCC, it needs to be licensed under GPL, even if it's
distributed in-house.
On Friday 28 Aug 2009, Anupam Jain wrote:
However I wonder about the proprietary compiler itself. if it's based
on GCC, it needs to be licensed under GPL, even if it's distributed
in-house. So any developer who works for this company and has lawful
access to the executable can demand the
