In a message dated 9/9/09 11:06:22 PM, dantear...@gmail.com writes:
I donno. I'd like to think there will be at least one interestingly
new gizmo available before we all get borged.
...before?
4 of Adjuct 17, formerly known as Craig W.
You Will Be Assimilated
- me/us(!)
I dunno, man. I think there is a lot of room for innovation in the
space between this drive for cost-cutting and the re-architecture
response the industry is producing.
I also think you and I would make for a good G4 talk show :D
--
Jarett T. DeAngelis, MS
Sr. IT Support Engineer
I think there is a lot of room for innovation in the
space between this drive for cost-cutting and the re-architecture
response the industry is producing.
No doubt. I just don't find that interesting. Expectable, predictable,
virtually certain. zzz
I also think you and I would
So the user feels ripped off
I'm starting to think that none of you were around when the expression
was coined.
Ripped off means: They took your money and gave you NOTHING (or
something that appeared to be something valuable but which turned out to
be worthless).
We're going into your
On Sep 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
Personally, I'm waiting for the future Apple processors that will
replace the Intel chips. Since Apple bought a chip maker about 18
months
ago, I'm hoping they are getting close to releasing them soon.
Don't hold your breath...Apple
On Sep 7, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Malcolm O'Brien wrote:
I'm starting to think that none of you were around when the expression
was coined.
Ripped off means: They took your money and gave you NOTHING (or
something that appeared to be something valuable but which turned
out to
be worthless).
On 9/8/09 10:12 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu Broadcast
into the ether:
Steve Job's hand-picked Apple Retail Ninjas will come to
your house and force you at katana point to buy the new version.
Yeah, I think he upgraded the ninja's. I woke up and it was just installed
the
Call me crazy, but I think ARM is the future of computing. ARM is a
much more sensible ISA than x86 or even PPC, and we keep seeing more
and more powerful ARM chips come out every year. Meanwhile, everyone
is porting everything they can to it.
Picture ten years down the road: 2GHz ARM
Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
Personally, I'm waiting for the future Apple processors that will
replace the Intel chips. Since Apple bought a chip maker about 18
months
ago, I'm hoping they are getting close to releasing them soon.
Don't
I'd agree with you except that there is some writing on the wall that
makes me think ARM will continue to be an increasing threat. We're
now reaching the stage where we blur the line between mobile and
laptop/desktop OSes. Android runs on everything these days. Apple
ported OS X to run
On Sep 6, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
The box set is a ripoff because it contains software that I DON'T
want; I should not be required to buy unwanted applications just to
upgrade my operating system. Apple is the new Microsoft.
HAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Oh my...you've
Why would you categorize it as a ripoff? It's a ripoff if the product being
sold is totally overpriced for what you get, NOT if it's not what you want.
Remember, value for money is the key. Don't forget that the Boxed Set is NOT
a requirement for upgrading. The Boxed Set is ONLY if you NEED iLife,
It would be a rip-off if only the keycode from the box set worked for
upgrading from Tiger. But there are no keycodes, so the $30 single
user CD will upgrade from Tiger, and also install on as many Macs as
you can get your hands on. Legality is the only issue there. That's
not a rip-off,
Jonathan Rowson wrote:
Why would you categorize it as a ripoff? It's a ripoff if the product
being sold is totally overpriced for what you get, NOT if it's not what
you want. Remember, value for money is the key. Don't forget that the
Boxed Set is NOT a requirement for upgrading. The Boxed
Hi there: I am hearing rumors that the $29 disk will install on any
Intel Mac, regardless of whether there's a previous installation of
Leopard. Anybody know if that's true?
***
Bill Spencer in Maryland
IMac Core Duo 2.4 ghz/1 g RAM/Snow Leopard
IMac Core Duo 1.83 ghz/1 g RAM/Tiger
That does appear to be the case. Although to do so would be a
violation of the EULA...
--ryan
Sent from my iPod Touch
On Sep 6, 2009, at 8:30, Bill Spencer wspen...@jhu.edu wrote:
Hi there: I am hearing rumors that the $29 disk will install on any
Intel Mac, regardless of whether there's
Yup, that about sums it up. Apple figures that if you never bought
Leopard, then you never paid the $130 for it, and therefore should buy
the way more expensive Box set Snow Leopard.
It'll upgrade Tiger anyways, though, so I don't know how they're going
to enforce this...
-Elliott
Well, like we all pointed out, you don't have to. There's still no
keycodes, either.
-Elliott Price
Mac Computer Repair - Santa Barbara
Graphic Design - Artwork Setup
Websites - Low Cost Custom Websites
On Sep 6, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
Elliott Price wrote:
Yup,
anyone done the 29 dollar install on their tiger?
Janice F. Jorgensen
- Original Message -
From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
To: imaclist@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Snow Leopard from Tiger...?
At 9:31 AM -0700 9/6/2009, Dennis B. Swaney
Protip: Apple is a hardware company. I certainly don't have any moral
qualms about using my SL disc to do a clean install on a Tiger
machine. The alternative is frankly stupid.
--
Jarett T. DeAngelis, MS
Sr. IT Support Engineer
Distributed Support Services, College of Arts and Letters
...@gmail.com
To: imaclist@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Snow Leopard from Tiger...?
At 9:31 AM -0700 9/6/2009, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
The box set is a ripoff because it contains software that I DON'T
want; I should not be required to buy unwanted
ATT is the reason why I don't have an iPhone. Based on my usage of
and experience with my iPod Touch, I'm quite sure I would love the
iPhone's hardware and interface. But I'm not willing to downgrade both
my wireless connectivity and customer service by going from Sprint to
ATT...
--ryan
And this relates to SL how?
Sent from my eyeFone
On Sep 6, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Waldon ryanwaldon2...@gmail.com
wrote:
ATT is the reason why I don't have an iPhone. Based on my usage of
and experience with my iPod Touch, I'm quite sure I would love the
iPhone's hardware and interface.
I know! I know! Snow Leopard, the iPhone and the iTouch are all made by
Apple. ;)
Gary Fortman wrote:
And this relates to SL how?
Sent from my eyeFone
On Sep 6, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Waldon ryanwaldon2...@gmail.com
wrote:
ATT is the reason why I don't have an iPhone. Based on my
24 matches
Mail list logo
