Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Mark Kahn
I know they don't with mysql. I don't remeber exactly why, but it's something like mysql needs the / or \ character escaped (havn't used mysql in a couple years). -Mark -- Original Message -- From: "Ives Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [IMail Forum] Slow Web Messaging - Corrupt MBX Files?

2003-03-26 Thread Denise Pera
Eric, How would I set my page file to 3X Ram? Thanks, Denise On 3/23/2003 8:48 PM, "Eric Shanbrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mumbled: > Set your page file to 3X Ram and see if that does anything. I doubt it is > set to that if you used the default setup > > Eric S > - Original Message - >

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Unless I'm missing something, I believe the ODBC drivers should work with > *any* ODBC data source. Not quite any: there are syntactical differences that make some RDBMSs--for instance, Sybase SQLAnywhere(AFAIK)and MySQL--non-workable with the standard DLL. I don't

Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Ives Stoddard
Unless I'm missing something, I believe the ODBC drivers should work with *any* ODBC data source. You would have to have the appropriate DB2 ODBC driver installed on your server, but so long as you've setup the tables properly you should be all set. The only time you would need to make modificati

Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Eric Shanbrom
ftp://ftp.ipswitch.com//Ipswitch/Product_Support/IMail/odbcuser.zip Eric S - Original Message - From: "Hawk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:19 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database > At 02:09 PM 3/26/2003 -0500, you w

[IMail Forum] listserver aliases

2003-03-26 Thread dchan
Is it possible to streamline an unsubscribe request without requiring a user to reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the text "unsubscribe listname"? If it's any more convoluted than the user simply replying to the email is it really a listserver?! Ideally, I'd like to try writing an alias that w

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
I updated to 7.15 after seeing that thread earlier. No change. Sheathing sword for battle axe.. And I've just installed sp2 for Office XP. No change. Perhaps we need Ouzies! Sharyn We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best i

Re: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Kurt Jung
I updated to 7.15 after seeing that thread earlier. No change. Sheathing sword for battle axe.. Kurt - Original Message - From: "Sharyn Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: March 26, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour > So,

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Rod Dorman
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 14:58:48, Sharyn Schmidt wrote: SS> I'll wave my sword with you, Kurt, as we stand shoulder to shoulder SS> yelling Death to HTML emails. SS> Got a solution??? I often refer people to http://www.expita.com/nomime.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
So, the next question is, has anyone patched to 7.15 and is still seeing this stationary problem? Sharyn We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best in the World" at the annual San Francisco Wine and Spirits Championships. For more info

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Death to HTML emails!! (sorry, got carried away there...) Kurt I'll wave my sword with you, Kurt, as we stand shoulder to shoulder yelling Death to HTML emails. Got a solution??? :) I emailed Ipswitch about this and they told me to install the 7.15 patch. I don't see how that will h

Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Hawk
At 02:09 PM 3/26/2003 -0500, you wrote: If the one out of the box doesn't the source is available to be customized for your particular needs where can I get the source? thanks Eric S - Original Message - From: "Hawk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Imail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, Ma

Re: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Eric Shanbrom
If the one out of the box doesn't the source is available to be customized for your particular needs Eric S - Original Message - From: "Hawk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Imail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

Re: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Kurt Jung
Rick & Sharyn, How timely this forum can be! I had a user complain about this exact problem yesterday. Turns out, her customer is using a Stationery background (from Outlook Express 6) and sure enough, viewing the source of the webmail shows a tag with no closing tag. BUT, looking at the sourc

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behavior

2003-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
> I, personally, don't see where it is necessary to have "bells and > whistles" in your email such as the fancy stationary provides, however, > my boss does not agree with me. Bosses are so weird like that. :)) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton,

[IMail Forum] SQL and Imail external database

2003-03-26 Thread Hawk
Hi, Does anyone know whether or not the ODBCUSER.DLL work with DB2? thanks. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Friend.ly.net.] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: ht

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
We have found with certain "stationary" the client will put in a tag like:. In an HTML parser this will look like a "title" tag that is never closed. IN the View source do a search for title. for every it finds there should be a closing tag as well for it to be considered valid HTML. Not all st

Re: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Eric Shanbrom
We have found with certain "stationary" the client will put in a tag like:. In an HTML parser this will look like a "title" tag that is never closed. IN the View source do a search for title. for every it finds there should be a closing tag as well for it to be considered valid HTML. Not all styl

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
What does it look like if you do a view source on the message? Does it work ok from a mail client? What do the message headers say? Ok..I was able to duplicate this rather quickly this time, by using one of the messages that a user sent me that didn't show up in someone else's web messaging. H

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
What does it look like if you do a view source on the message? Does it work ok from a mail client? What do the message headers say? It works fine when I view it with an email client. I am going to have to work on creating the problem again as I went ahead and removed all my messages from the se

Re: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Eric Shanbrom
What does it look like if you do a view source on the message? Does it work ok from a mail client? What do the message headers say? Eric S - Original Message - From: "Sharyn Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: [IMail Forum]

Re: [IMail Forum] AOL strangeness

2003-03-26 Thread Mark Reeve
alias groups whose address is on AOL. > > Actually, the log file snippet shows something that is not unique to this > specific E-mail/alias/group, but any E-mail you send to AOL. > > >20030326 103934 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1044) Connect aol.com [64.12.138.57:25] (1) > > Here, yo

RE: [IMail Forum] FW: MS03-007 Round-up

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
ntoskrnl.exe versions 5.0.2195.4797 to 5.0.2195.4928 are not compatible with versions of ntdll.dll that are greater than 5.0.2195.4797. I saw this same message on the MS Website..I posted the link to the article yesterday. Ensure that the ntoskrnl.exe file version is greater than or equal to 5

[IMail Forum] FW: MS03-007 Round-up

2003-03-26 Thread Paul Navarre
The message below was posted to the Focus-MS list recently. There was some dicussion on our list as to whether applying this patch might cause a problem. This message would appear to have the details spelled out. I cannot however vouch for its accuracy. Paul Navarre -Original Message- F

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behavior

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Is there a HTML background or sheet style in the sent version? Nope..I set this on my client personally. There is no background, special font color, signature, nothing. All I did was switch my options in outlook from plain text to html. I have had several users complaining of this and had be

RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behavior

2003-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
Is there a HTML background or sheet style in the sent version? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn S

[IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour

2003-03-26 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Sometimes, when a message is sent from Outlook XP, in html format, and is viewed in webmessaging, the entire body of the message is blank. The From, Date, To and Subject line are fine. This used to happen with the older versions of IMAIL, but instead of being blank, it would come out coded/garbled

[IMail Forum] KWM log question.

2003-03-26 Thread paul
hanks! Paul 20030326 095316 Auth Logon paul 63.160.179.12 Xa60e9e9d9a9acbc89ec8950a19a6 81 0. Ok, I get this part, I logged on . 20030326 095319 Web Error paul 63.160.179.12 0 - open failed for D:\IMail\Web\KWMImages/mail.2khiway.net.gif. I can't figure out what this image is! Or what's

Re: [IMail Forum] d.o.s. questions

2003-03-26 Thread Smart Business Lists
Wednesday, March 26, 2003 you wrote: THS> port threads THS> you run crashimail.exe mail.yoursite 110 250-400 THS> say bye bye to pop3, it prevents any pop3 connection. It didn't kill the service or server though (at least for me). Just out of curiosity how

Re: [IMail Forum] d.o.s. questions

2003-03-26 Thread paul
hm... hold on a sec > in previous versions like 6.x, it would stop the webmessaging service all together and you would manulayy restart it, but had no effect on smtp or pop3. Yesterday, I noticed our web messaging service stopped, when I went to Imail admin it was stopped, so I started it

Re: [IMail Forum] d.o.s. questions

2003-03-26 Thread Dan Shadix
Have you reported this to Ipswitch? Hopefully they have been listening and are checking on this right now but you can never be sure unless you report it to them directly. -- Original Message -- From: "tim " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [IMail Forum] AOL strangeness

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Our Imail server appears to function normally for all mail usage with the exception of a member of one of our alias groups whose address is on AOL. Actually, the log file snippet shows something that is not unique to this specific E-mail/alias/group, but any E-mail you send to AOL. 20030326

Re: [IMail Forum] Secondary MX

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I somewhat agree with your explanation concerning this. "It makes sense" What I don't understand is this.. and please try it yourself. I can not send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with our IMail 7.15 server. [Just for the record -- this is not related to the "TCP RST" secondary MX issue, which is

[IMail Forum] AOL strangeness

2003-03-26 Thread Mark Reeve
Our Imail server appears to function normally for all mail usage with the exception of a member of one of our alias groups whose address is on AOL.   The logs show as below:   20030326 103934 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1044) D:\IMail\spool\Q279b8b8042c.GSC 20030326 103934 127.0.0.1 SMTP (1044

Re: [IMail Forum] Second MX ignored in IMail 7.14

2003-03-26 Thread Rick Leske
yea well.. i do believe they skip it for the 7.15 as well.. ~Rick - Original Message - From: "Ipswitch Listbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:23 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Second MX ignored in IMail 7.14 > Good news for all admins who h

RE: [IMail Forum] d.o.s. questions

2003-03-26 Thread Timothy Hunold Sr Programmer
port threads you run crashimail.exe mail.yoursite 110 250-400 say bye bye to pop3, it prevents any pop3 connection. i used server[a] to attack server[b] and watched from my desktop. While the above was running at 300 threads: connection timed out. connectio

Re: [IMail Forum] Second MX ignored in IMail 7.14

2003-03-26 Thread Ipswitch Listbox
Good news for all admins who had to implement the HOSTS file workaround: SMTP behaviour is changed in IMail 7.15.to skip MX hosts which do not answer properly on SMTP. At least it works in my installation. Thank you Ipswitch! Marius - Original Message - From: "Ipswitch Listbox" <[EMAIL PR

Re: [IMail Forum] d.o.s. questions

2003-03-26 Thread Smart Business Lists
Tuesday, March 25, 2003 you wrote: T> let me rephrase, I can D.o.s. my own server on ports 25, 110, 8181, T> 8383, 8384, using crashimail. so long as the app runs, no T> connections. once you stop, it pops back to life. Testing IMAIL 7.15 on my old exceedingly quirky and underpowered Compaq

Re: [IMail Forum] Secondary MX

2003-03-26 Thread Smart Business Lists
Tuesday, March 25, 2003 you wrote: B> So did we ever get a straight answer on why IMail doesn't even try B> to use the 2ndry MX record? I couldn't find it I've tested this extensively on my system and I have not observed this behavior since somewhere in the 7.1 series either in devised te