> Sorry... I feel bad about this... I will be careful next time when I
> post a question...
No reason to be *careful* per se, but just realize that when you don't
search the archives first, and when the more knowledgeable people on
this list know that there are numerous archived threads
Sorry..I feel bad about this...I will be careful next time when I post a
question..anyway thanks for all the info..you all have been such a great
help..Thanks again..
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:53 AM
Subject: Re
> Is there a way to disable a domain admin from implementing a nobody
> alias? I'm using 2006.1 if that matters.
Use JavaScript validation certainly as the first line of defense, and
nightly scans as a double-check.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technolo
Jasmine-
1) Check every domain on your server for
a "nobody" alias. Delete any that you find.
2) Check all the rules, and change any
whose action is "bounce" to "delete".
Here are the details:
1) Imail accepts mail for each valid address, whether that is a mailbox or
an alias (or in so
I have not seen an option in the IAdmin interface that would allow you to
block a nobody alias.
You can check to see what domains have "nobody" implemented by accessing
Start | Run | regedit
Navigate to HKLM/Software/Ipswitch/Imail/domains.
Search for "nobody"
-d
- Original Message -
Is there a way to disable a domain admin from implementing a nobody alias?
I'm using 2006.1 if that matters.
I'm not really sure if any of the domains use a nobody alias or not.
-Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jasmine Marin"
Sent: Sunday, N
Hopefully, it sends a 550 -
unkown addressee - error, rather than a bounce message.
- Original Message -
From:
Servei Tecnic [
MICROTECH ]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:58
AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spamcop
Blackl
Or could we at least put a new subject line on the etiquette thread of this
discussion?
- Original Message -
From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..
I second the motion. All in f
> I read up on the FAQ about this and they pretty much said that the
> problem is that our mail server accepts all mail, then determines
> whether it can deliver it, and if it can't at that point it bounces
> it. They say we need to change the settings in IMail to bounce mail
> immediately b
Right On
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 4:33 PM
To: Jim F.
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..
> ... making people who might not be comfortable asking a questi
I second the motion. All in favor . . .
Sunday, November 12, 2006, 4:34:30 PM, David Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DW> Can we stop this please?
DW> David
DW> -Original Message-
DW> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DW> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
DW> Sent: 12 Nov
Can we stop this please?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: 12 November 2006 22:33
To: Jim F.
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..
> ... making people who might not be comfortable ask
> ... making people who might not be comfortable asking a question
> feel even more alienated.
Yo, Sensitive Type: saying "New threads on this are pretty ridiculous"
is not an ad hominem attack: it's closer to a point of fact. Do you
even have any idea how age-old the "How to export
I wasn't moderating... just pointing out that while the word "ridiculous"
may have been unfortunate, the counterattack was not good.
I also added some parameters to assist with a search for useful info.
I see no reason why a response to a question cannot be "search the
archives". It would take q
14 matches
Mail list logo
