Heh funny. Moved to hmailserver a few years ago as the gateway to our
exchange box. I've never been able to get off the list, it just keeps
getting dumped in it's folder and I delete the folder from time to time.
Considered bouncing the message as protest, but never did it.
__
I've never heard of such a thing. Port blocking has some very legitimate
uses. Such a law would serious screw things up. Source?
I seem to remember Comcast getting their hand slapped for masquerading
as customers PC on p2p networking, but nothing like that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I use: http://www.iptools.com/
dnsstuff.com has become too commercialized to be useful anymore.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:05 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMai
In my setup, the users are sending from an address in which relaying is
allowed. They usually don't, or have to SMTP Auth
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
Hosting
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:57 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.
: Friday, December 01, 2006 8:20 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird delivery problem
2006.1
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Yeah I have been tracking that same error, under the thread "550 not
local host error" on Imail 8.22 seems to have come on about the time we
did the SMTP fix, I don't know if they are related. Are you running 8.22
as well?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
ngs a flood of
minor complaints, like my PC is too old, or I want such and such
software). :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:15 AM
To: Chris Moody
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
Monday, November 13, 2006, 12:32:21 PM, Chris Moody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
CM> -Original Message-
[Snip]
CM> Are you absolutely sure there's no prior (could be way earlier)
CM> connect a
@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
On Monday, November 13, 2006, 07:42:38, Chris Moody wrote:
> I had another complaint Friday. User received the same error message,
> logs showed something a bit different though.
> 20061110 102455 127.0.0.1
at failed right in the middle of sending an email, to the same person
and everything.
Any ideas?
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:27 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Foru
her virt.Hosts in the past - trough addomain.exe
from the command line.
Certain shortly added domains seemed working while others does not.
One time I was able to solve the problem by stopping and restarting the
SMTP-Service.
Markus
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
eServices For You
"Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood."
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
> Sent: Wednesday, November
ven so, if it is in the relay
list it should go thru then.
Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications
http://www.etczone.com
812-932-1000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Wednesday, Novembe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:43 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 550 not local host error
I've had an interesting problem that has been cropping up more and
I've had an interesting problem that has been cropping up more and more
lately. Sometimes a user will send email and it will come back:
From: System Administrator
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:20 PM
To: John Doe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject:Undeliverable: Lunch
Your messag
d the previous message. You were offering
these as examples and advising to choose ONE, not use them all. ;-)
That makes sense. *self-administered dope slap in progress*
~M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Friday, October 27, 20
there would be little if any
benefit from using several systems in succession as they all mostly
offer the same options/features -- give or take a couple.
~M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:31 PM
To
ASSP, IMGATE, , Barracuda and Alligate all sit in front of the mail server
and act as a gateway. If you keep your mail server otherwise firewalled and
have one of these products out in front then the vulnerability is mitigated
(from external sources).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Indeed. IMGate or ASSP. This was the deciding factor in our implementing
ASSP. The Sonicwall closes the other issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:08 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject:
It can
be argued that software developers might have a certain moral interest in
patching their software if the vulnerability can be used to hurt others. Windows
95 is pretty long in tooth, and few systems are still running on Windows 95.
Imail 8.x on the other hand is not even comparatively
I
can't knock Ipswitch for not wanting to support a product indefinetly, but it
seems like the pulled the plug on 8.x and 7.x rather soon. Even Microsoft
support Win 98 until recently, and that is far more complex than Imail.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailt
Ack, not Horde I meant SquirrelMail. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:23 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE
2006.1
Really
Really for polish and the support Imail is very tough to beat, it is what we
like to offer to customers first looking for plain old email/webmail server.
If what you need is the abilites of Exchange, then buy Exchange. ICS doesn't
compete well there.
For those that just don't want to pay the lice
A! Yeah we never made use of Webmail, but an IMAP webmail interface on
another server. 8.X and below were highly intergrated with Imail. We never
examined the issue with Webmail in depth. It seemed too difficult to do, and
intergrated webmail didn't have the features we wanted.
-Original M
What you want is for ASSP to process the email first. Change Imail's default
SMTP port to something else, (lets say 125) change the SMTP Destination in
ASSP to 127.0.0.1:125 and ASSPs Listen port to 25. The idea is to make ASSP
process all SMTP information first, including local users. This is how
I am curious how effective Imail's Premium Antispam setup is? Anyone used it
and another solution to compare? How does it compare to say Barracuda,
Declude, ASSP, Alligate, IMGate?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_fo
Yes, we run it on the same box as Imail 8.22. We have had great success with
it and of all the solutions it has been the least expensive to implement,
and we found it easier to setup than Declude.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beach Computer
Yeah it's in there. I never did anything with it.
I am sure it's just a framework. Nothing is coming up on a quick search but
this mentions that it is in there:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/scripts/iis/iis6/imap/default.
mspx?mfr=true
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
Yeah it's in there. I never did anything with it.
I am sure it's just a framework. Nothing is coming up on a quick search but
this mentions that it is in there:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:13
t: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition
>
> Webmail would be web serving, but POP3, IMAP, and SMTP would not.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &
Antivirus Software...interesting point. In this case the email goes though a
gateway appliance that takes care of all that, but it is a Windows system
and that demands an A/V solution just for the box anyway if not for email. I
can't see where they would fault you for running that. Microsoft's
stat
hibited."
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/web.mspx#E4D
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Moody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 7:51 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition
| We
We have a customer that wants to run an inexpensive copy of Windows 2003
Server (Web Edition) as the basis for his Imail server. He isn't going to
run AD on this machine and it's only job will be to push Imail. Has anyone
done this? Was it successful? Any pitfalls?
Thanks...
To Unsubscribe: http:
When we upgraded to 8.22 during a recent maintenance (yeah I'm slow) TLS was
somehow enabled in SMTP. Several domains that have been trying to send to us
since and have been getting TLS handshake errors and were unable to send
their email. Eventually it would time out of their queue. More often we
Heh, I remember being a kid and living in Florida. Dad owned a construction
company and they were digging out a lake. 12 feet down I could walk along
and find all kinds of petrified bones and teeth from sharks and who knows
what else all miles from the ocean. Underwater indeed. :)
-Original Me
"Ooops...did I just linx it?"
What that "linux it" or "jinx it"? Same thing I suppose... =)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net
Webmaster
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 11:18 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum]
Scratch that, I wasn't considering our anti-spam gateway.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 1:01 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Error 403
I've been getting a
I've been getting a number of complaints about missing mail coming in to our
server. The errors these folks have been getting is (reason: 403 4.7.0 TLS
handshake failed.) The messages try for a time and finally fall out of the
Mail Server's Queue. Any ideas?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com
ED] Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:50 AM
To: Chris Moody
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ASSP
HI Chris,
> I see where it could become troublesome for ISPs or Hosting providers
however.
Could you please explain, why?
Am Mittwoch
It is the best open source Windows friendly anti-spam system I have tried. I
am quite happy with it for small business applications. I see where it could
become troublesome for ISPs or Hosting providers however.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Here, here!
*kaplunk*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Imail
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:13 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] I will be out of the office and unavailable
until June 26th.
Rootdesign just earned
Agreed, we have been using this with version 8.2 and it has been great. Very
little upkeep is needed, an ideal solution for a small company where everyone
has pretty much the same idea of what is and is not spam. I found the training
to be less of a PITA than messing with decludes filters, and A
Oh for Pete's sake.
*Kaplunk*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Frayne
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:59 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New Email Address
RE: New Email Address
Dear Friends,
Due to t
Blue Security calls it quits I see. In a way it really bothers me. A spammer
wins by bullying. Blue's methods were just too radical for broad support I
guess.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/16/AR2006051601
873.html?nav=rss_technology/techpolicy
To Unsubscribe: http:/
It's
expensive. I wonder if not many are using Imail Secure because of the price. On
the price difference between Imail Secure Server unlimited and Imail Server
unlimited we could by an anti spam appliance like Mail Foundry 4100 or Barracuda
400. That also takes some of the load off the mail
We are looking at Imail Secure 2006, I am wondering what everyone's
experiance has been on the effectiveness of this solution, say versus
Declude or IMGate or other solutions.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%4
Indeed, easier for an attacked site to mitigate the DDoS that way. If you
had BlueSecuritys IP cached you could get to them after it was redirected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:04 PM
To: Imail_Foru
This wasn't malicious on BlueSecurity's part, but an admitted poor decision.
They thought that they were being attacked by IP address as usual, not by
domain.
Their mistake was not realized until Six Apart was well under attack. They
just wanted people to know they were still around. Last I heard
Try this: http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/6157/1/
BlueSecurity is currently under a massive DDoS attack. I doubt we will see
them up anytime soon.
http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=F7152D27-E10F-433B-B1E6-57B3B
48EF892
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
There was a big discussion about the ethics of BlueSecurity's methods here
when they first came out. I have to say though, filtering is a bandaid at
best. We have ASSP and as fast as it adapts to changing spam, it can't keep
up when the spammer is altering the message every few emails and it gets
f
Hi Robert,
These guys have a low tolerence for items that are an easy find in the
archives. It's gotten better, there used to be some serious flames for that.
Try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/msg97265.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=ima
It falls back to the same problem: the email system is fundamentally flawed.
The idea of a fee to make sure email from your server can get to the big boy
email servers isn't that far fetched.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ronald E.
Kushner
S
Title: Message
Basically a "Trusted" RBL list of hosts known to
be used in dictionary attacks. As with the trouble of all RBLs it's only as
good as long as it's updated and that includes removals. Blanket bans of entire
blocks may be feasible for small business, but anyone that is hosting lot
We run 4 domains through it. It will handle more than a single domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ryan Burglehaus
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 2:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: ASSP ( was: RE: [IMail Forum] under
ASSP initially blocks more out of the box, that is why you initially run it
in a learning mode.
Declude on the other hand block much less, and you have to ramp it up.
ASSP to me also took much less effort on my part than Declude to set up and
maintain.
Declude is far more configurable than ASSP
Ours runs on a Windows 2000 server box, nothing special. The only job the
server does is run PERL (which is needed by ASSP), ASSP, and Imail.
You can run ASSP on a separate box if you wish. It will run on anything that
will run PERL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
Agreed. You need to get that registry
information somehow. Everything that was your Imail setup was in there...unless
you were using AD or a database to store your user information.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Martin
Scha
SHHH! It might become a new option for
us to pay for! ;)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Martin
SchaibleSent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:11 PMTo: Glenn
BullionSubject: Re: [IMail Forum]
Hi,
I didn't know, that I
The
more you over take the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain. :)
Your
out of luck, only Ipswitch is going to be able to work with you on activation.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Scott
SmithSent: Monday,
Okay so if I understand this, 8.0 through 8.15HF2 and 8.2 are affected.
There is a patch for 8.2, but there will not be a patch for 8.0/8.15?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:28 PM
To: IMail_Fo
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.asp
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
JHSent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:46 AMTo:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] How do we get
removed from IPswitch's ema
I agree Cameron. We use ASSP for our company mail, and it has been
excellent. It is low maintenance, low false positives once the machines has
completed it's learning cycle. It calls Clamwin easily enough, but your
usage of McAfee's SMTP webshield is a good idea. It's part of our AV
package, but I
Walelabrook looks like a "reseller" for eNom.
There are some people that run money buying expired domain names with the
hope that someone let them expire by accident and will pay $$$ to get them
back. Of course then they can also sit on them and hope someone will want it
and is willing to pay for
Looks like you used Enom and they took it over when it expired. Unless the
new owner used Enom to buy and park the domain.
Good news is if you did use Enom, it's not totally gone. Enom usually parks
domains at those generic sites when they expire. Trick is they won't
reinstate your domain unless y
Welcome to the Imail 'support' group Sam. We all have similar stories here.
We just take it one day at a time. :)
This thread just opened some old wounds, you should have seen the outpouring
(and exodus) with the ICS launch and Stand alone Imail discontinuance. I
think the news of Imail server's r
We use ASSP. http://assp.sourceforge.net/
It's open source, but works VERY well for a business where everyone pretty
much has a consistant vision of what spam is. It calls ClamWin for AV. I
imagine you could use that aspect of it, and bypass the spam filtering
(although it blows Imail's away, and
the user level. It could be limited there
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Moody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] mailbox size too large
> Hi Laura,
>
> I thought about that, but the bounce sho
? Login to your webmail
and you should see the limit I'm talking about - even though I have mine set
to 0 as well, I still see the webmail limit. Just a thought
~Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Monday, October 1
. the 2500 indicates that correct?!?!?
20051016 161914 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ae29032401d63999) ERR domain.com scott
mailbox size too large (2500-0)
Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at's my recollection.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 9:26 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] mailbox size too large
I have a customer that is attempting
ctober 17, 2005 12:34 PM
To: Chris Moody
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] mailbox size too large
Hi Chris,
One of our users has a 350 mb mailbox and it works ;-)
Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2005 um 18:26 schrieben Sie:
> I have a customer that is att
I have a customer that is attempting to send an unsually large attachment,
about 28MB in size. I politely suggested we set up a FTP for him, but he
technically should be able to send such a large email, correct? For his
domain, Mailbox sizes and limits are set to "0" for unlimited as well as on
the
If your webhosting it's tough. I think most agree that Imail's anti-spam
engine isn't suffient. It takes lots of work to maintain as far as the ever
changing filters go.
I really like ASSP, it's easy to maintain and it's the boss' favorite price
(free). It's draw back is that everyone has to have
Aye!
The Ayes have it. Your Elected Robert. Congratulations! We look forward to a
full report. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: R
your computer. Your last two
messages appeared at the top of the list of messages, both showing July
23, 2003.
adamc
Chris Moody wrote:
> Sorry I see you did find the carts, but are looking for an all in one
> system. I don't know of any for industrial, just the medical type
> worksta
Sorry I see you did find the carts, but are looking for an all in one
system. I don't know of any for industrial, just the medical type
workstations which 'should' work the same:
http://www.flohealthcare.com/computercart.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
It's Expensive:
http://www.powercart.com/docs/products/logistics/printing.html
Or: http://www.taperack.com/laptopcart.asp
or to extend a Laptop Battery: http://www.batterygeek.net/index.htm
In either case, go with a laptop and USB label printer. Much lower power
consumption.
-Original Mess
D] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:07 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: OOPS! Re: Read: [IMail Forum] IMail AV
And don't you just hate all us wise guys that actually reply the the read
reciepts? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
And don't you just hate all us wise guys that actually reply the the read
reciepts? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Art McNamara
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:43 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: OOPS! Re: Read: [IMail F
Sorry that would have appeared in the system log
and you already said your not seeing anything there.
Skype packets? Really odd. Skype uses port 80 (http)
and port 443 (https) shutting off those ports may confim or debunk that.
It doesn't look like a virus...but it doesn't crash
when un
Interesting. I don't know what AV your running, but
you might try downloading McAfee Stinger just to be sure nothing was compromised
by a more recent virus. You also might try one of the free software firewalls to
see what traffic is going in and out. You don't get an error from the LASS
pro
It sounds like an OS issue rather than an Imail
issue. Stop the Imail services, does the machine still hang? Take it off
network, does it still hang?
What OS? Windows NT uses a special user account
known as the anonymous logon account.
- Original Message -
From:
Roland Sic
Use at your own risk. I make no claims as to this lists fitness or accuracy.
This certainly won't stop all the Nigerian emails. They often use free mail
accounts out of country to try and solicit. # Nigeria IP blocks:
# List of ip blocks allocated and assigned directly by RIRs to ISPs
# a
You must have the server set to refuse NULL senders. This is a bad thing.
Your also not complying with RFCs if your doing this.
Check it out here: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DD02.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26,
Yes, but you can't add antivirus to that anymore. You can't buy new
licenses, just renewals. Regardless of the platitudes we have seen,
Ipswitch's continued support for Imail as a product is iffy at best. How
long before ICS actually becomes an integrated product and not just a pricey
combination
It's junk. Disregard.
- Original Message -
From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Odd listserv messages
> Is any one else getting messages from Ãô which render in
Chinese/Japanese/or whatever? Is he/she a member of the
blacklist.sequoia.ops.asp.att.net is one of the private AT&T RBLs. AT&T is
known for heavy handed blacklisting and the info to get off the list is next
to nil.
We had a customer that was blacklisted earlier in the month by AT&T. We
couldn't find any information on contacting AT&T directly about th
Six including this one.
Missing the list eh?
- Original Message -
From: "MIS Dept" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:24 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Number of messages today
> Hello,
>
> I have received only five messages from Imail Forum today, I find this
very
>
the
> list at:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Moody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:47 AM
> Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Declude configs
>
I should point out that this was for Declude Junkmail.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Moody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Declude configs
> Sorry for the off topic post. I am demoing Declude, and rather
Sorry for the off topic post. I am demoing Declude, and rather than sign up
for yet another mailing list I thought I'd ask the Declude Aficionados here
if they could share samples of their configs for me to work/learn from.
Thanks!
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To Unsu
Not I...rebuilding my Imail server does not sound
like fun right now. I'll wait for the other guinea pigs...errr people to try it
first.
- Original Message -
From:
Eric
Parsons
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:33
PM
Subject:
Agreed- your going to be far better off to start fresh than try and root out
any hooks that were left there for future entry. Your unlikely to find them
all.
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: [I
Paying this guy is a bad idea. The damage is already done.
The spammer most likely already broke one law (Can-Spam) and the demand for
more money to stop spamming sounds a lot like extortion. He should call the
local FBI field office and file a complaint. Given this guys behavior,
paying him off i
I am going to wear my delete key out on this thread before it finally dies.
Someone hit it with a hammer and put it out of it's misery, please!
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail
Please lets not get into Quantum physics...it's too early (or late, take
your pick) for that.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rod Dorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:43 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Lycos screensaver tackle
Darin,
Morality and Ethics are molded by what we can and cannot do or get away
with. It's a sad fact of humanity.
There is a reason why fighting back is a popular option. Governments do a
very poor job of policing technology. Spammers spam because they get away
with it and it is profitable. Email
Right you are Darin. It should work with IIS 5, but
you will need PHP and the SQL support. PostgreSQL is available if you don't like MySQL.
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:49
AM
Subject: Re: [IMail
Bill,
If you want a nice webmail client take a look at DWmail:
http://www.dominion-web.com/products/dwmail/
Whopping $37USD. Your server needs php/mySQL support and supports php IMAP
extensions.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Foresman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
8BITMIME
> 5610 S (310a) 250-SIZE 31981568
> 5610 S (310a) 250 PIPELINING
> 5610 S (310a) >MAIL FROM:<>
> 5610 S (310a) 250 null sender <> ok
> 5610 S (310a) >RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 5610 S (310a) 522 VS15-BT5 Mailbox bounce quota exceeded (#
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
