Technically yes, but that would have a big cost in terms of resources used.
There are better ways.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Gordon
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:24 PM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipsw
Start by going to a command prompt and typing "iisreset /restart" without
the quotes to restart IIS. Any error messages in the Windows event log? Is
the IMAP service set to restart on unexpected stop?
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTE
I have seen this attempt on 2 servers and it succeeded on one server when
some one set up a new domain and did not follow procedures to the T.
Change the passwords of all ROOT accounts YESTERDAY. That is what is being
used. The default root password is well known.
BTW, Declude Hijack stop
Additionally, while port 587 (which is reserved for the purpose of enforced
SMTP authentication) is the default for the additional port, it can be
changed.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:59 PM
To: Imail_F
It doesn't.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 7:35 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Content Filtering in Imail
>
> How does copy
Not tedious at all if you are using Declude and have Hijack configured.
Declude is the ONLY product that includes a specific way to track the number
of outgoing email and define a policy on this. So, even if an account was
comprised and they attempted to send through that account, Declude Hijack
wo
However, if Imail is doing that, deleting that file can cause emails to go
byebye. I have seen it happen.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:15 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] U
And I will freely and willingly continue to pay for both of those services
to not only ensure I have access to those excellent resources, but others as
well, for we all know that everything has costs associated with it and I can
not in good conscience utilize and depend upon resources without provi
rations
to the current Declude people. I try not to deal with them at all, but
might be willing to sign up if it's not them.
Thanks for the info...
-Joe
- Original Message -----
From: John T (lists) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent:
I believe a rate increase is coming, so it would be best to sign up now.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dns
The plot thickens. This is why it is important to tell us all details.
I would still like you to temporarily stop incoming connections from Postini
then and see what happens. Like some one else said, you are running a
version of Imail subject to vulnerabilities.
John T
> -Original Message-
I was just about to suggest the same. Try configuring the SMTP service to
not accept connections from 64.18.1.0/24 and see what happens.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27,
Alright, what I have been missing for a couple of years.
I'll have my wife start making the popcorn now.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:15 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list
Bill, I am looking forward to that. Would this be using the Declude logs or the
Imail logs to gather the IPs to block?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re:
Why is your gateway server accepting email for non-existent addresses? That
is the problem and that is what you have to resolve.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:46 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subjec
Is there a question, or is this just a statement?
Assuming there is supposed to be a question, and assuming the question is
along the lines of why is it rejected, the best entity to get the answer to
that question would be the administrator of the server that is rejecting the
message, as there is
is crap??? The only consistent
> factor I can find is the 208.x.y.z that IMail is trying to talk to. But
> since this IP isn't in the header, I see no way to tell IMail or Declude
to
> stop trying to talk to that server.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jo
It is trying to validate the from address, so it is doing a lookup for an MX
record and if not found an A record for the domain of the from address, then
trying to contact a email server at that IP address to see if the from
address exists.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
/ SmarterMail
Get the absolute best price on SmarterTools Software!
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 2:20 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Emails to pacbell.net being denied.
I
I have had a couple of users report getting NDRs on emails sent to
pacbell.net email addresses. I have verified this from 3 different Imail
servers as well as from DSL Extreme account and from a Hotmail.com account.
As soon as the MAIL FROM: command is sent, it responds 5.7.1 Access Denied.
Any
Get a statement in writing from ARIN stating exactly which IP blocks are
assigned to ISPs in those countries, which you will have to do again in 30
days since things change.
You are better off using an RBL that is based upon country. Some Firewalls
support the use of RBLs now.
John T
Fr
;
>
> I don't understand
>
> My server receives an email to an unknown user on my domain. How can I
turn
> it off so that my server does not send a notice back, to the spoofed
> address, that it is a bad address?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
systems now have a
way to turn off non local NDRs to prevent this, but IMAIL doesn't seem to
have that necessary feature now. I need a work around.
SJH
John T (lists) wrote:
No, if your server rejects it for invalid address, the sending server is the
one that is generating the NDR, not your
No, if your server rejects it for invalid address, the sending server is the
one that is generating the NDR, not yours. It is the problem of the sending
server that is connecting to yours, that server is either acting as an open
relay or has one (or more) of its users that is compromised.
John T
Travis, I have not used a Cuda but IMHO Declude beats all hands down.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All,
For tho
> I was also interested in Zimbra, due to their association with Red Hat,
but
> now I am wondering how their acquisition by Yahoo will affect the product
> and pricing structure. Although we are pretty much a Windows environment,
I
> am somewhat apprehensive about managing an Exchange Server. Can
> we're running good old 8.05 with applicable patches.
> The last couple of days, queue manager has been stopping/crashing
regularly,
> and I think I've found the reason. This excerpt from the syslog keeps
> repeating for each crash:
>
> SMTP-(09FC000C) ERR 005 - Send message thread exception hand
You will need to use an email client such as Outlook for this.
Create one email account in Outlook to connect to the user on the hostway
servers via POP3. Download all messages. Now create another email account in
Outlook as a IMAP account to your server for the same user. Now MOVE the
emails from
Can some one verify how passwords are started in a MS SQL database for a
ODBC based Imail 2006.21 domain? Are they in plain text or encrypted?
John T
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Kno
Did you follow the part in the KB about renaming the table in the database?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 12:30 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Official Host name change
Yes
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:04 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail issue
Would that be the main.xml??
-Original Message-
From: Travis Rabe [mail
Using an example of you want it moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to a folder
for that user called class1 the first rule would forward to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell
> Sent: Sunday,
Just a word of advice for those with users using Outlook and MAPI: One thing
I have learned over time is that large inboxes create problems.
What is the size of the inbox?
What I tell users, and practice myself, is to create folders and move email
out of the inbox to various folders wheneve
No, if it is a local user and the partition that is holding the mailboxes
becomes full, it will bounce the email.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail
Search the archives, I believe it is a Outlook IMAP bug. Is this Outlook
2003 or 2007?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:52 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 1
> > Someone else I spoke with who has some experience with Exchange also
> > suggested configuring users' Outlook clients to POP/SMTP via our
> > Imail server, and engage in IMAP only with the Exchange server. Then
> > the Outlook clients could be configured to utilize SMTP AUTH with
> > our
That is a Declude folder. If you must delete files from there, you will have
to stop the decludeproc service first.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Lees
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:09 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum
If it is a persistent connection, yes.
I do this now for a client. There is a VPN between my servers and their
network. Using Sonicwall Enhanced OS, you can control exactly what traffic
is allowed across the VPN, so it is limited to only those protocols the
client subscribes to the services for
There are no problems known at this time regarding specificly Windows Server
2003 SP2.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose MÂȘ Valades
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:23 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
>
Install Imail 2006.21 please.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 7:58 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Calendar questions
We are running 2006.2 on a Window 2003 server with dual ze
We know how it is up there in the Peoples Republic of Santa Cruz.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:08 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: Re: [IMail
o Imail.
Thanks,
Rob
PS Get something for that horrible cough! It might be contagious and
apparently senility is already kicking in here, I don't need a cold on top
of it!
John T (lists) wrote:
Well, I have been using Imail since version 6 and (cough) as long as I can
remember (cough) it
Well, I have been using Imail since version 6 and (cough) as long as I can
remember (cough) it seems to me (cough) that Imail only accepts email
(cough) for known Imail users. (Cough Cough)
After all, Imail is not Exchange, or at least pre 2003 default
configuration.
Now, if Imail is serving as a
Yes, run repair install.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 10:38 AM
To: imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 RC1 to release version
Hi,
Been on hold with the support de
Sounds like the Apple mail error that was in one of the betas. I do not know
which tech you have worked with, but if you can send the mailbox file that
contains the email in question to me so I can test it on my servers that
would help narrow down the problem.
John T
> -Original Message-
The hosting company is using Host Headers and will direct incoming requests
to the proper files by host header, not IP address.
Find a new hosting company.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:33 AM
To: Ima
If you are experiencing the SMTP service in Imail 2006.21 crashing, please
go to the following post on the Imail Forum and answer the poll.
http://forums.ipswitch.com/Topic35400-10-1.aspx
John T
Using POP3, it is working. In fact, with the Motorola Q.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.22 IMAP and Windows Mobile Outlook
Trying
If any on here knows who supports the Imail server for this domain, please
contact me off list.
Thank you.
John T
They are copied in realtime, as essentially the copyall account becomes a bcc
sort of.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:49 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving
All email gets processed by SMTPD32.exe and QueueManager.exe, so using the
copyall account will get a copy of all email.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:13 AM
> To: IM
28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / <http://www.tio.nl/>
www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail F
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \ characters, do you?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Why does this rul
If a reboot only cleared temporarily and it comes back, do your users have save
username and save password checked? If so, have them uncheck it, log in, then
they can check it again.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gray
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2
America Off Line strikes again.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 4:30 PM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem aft
pam tests and a gateway server.
>
> Nope - there is no way top bypass this behavior. All connection tests
> are
> done on the Gateway server.
>
> TR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
> (lists)
This is for a client that does not have Declude on his server.
How does SPF checks in Imail antispam work when in incoming email is first
received by a gateway server and then sent to Imail?
Is there a way to have Imail anitspam checks "skip" an internal or "trusted"
IP address and instead run c
Yes, this is normal.
However, if you search the Declude Virus archives, you will find information
on what is called the clam wrapper that some say have helped.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
> Sent: F
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:07 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file -
popup window " Domain Registry check error"
OK, that begets another question, w
Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file -
popup window " Domain Registry check error"
They are on separate internal nics , I outlined it wrong in the email.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Thursda
Why do you have both public and private IPs on the same NIC?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith
(N.O.R.A.D.)
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2
ail accepted weird recp address
>
> Check for hosts file for ssanaheim.com.
>
> Tripp
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "John T (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:46 PM
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail
Imail accepted an incoming postmaster notice to 1) a non-existant domain and
2) an address with odd characters. Can some one explain this, I have not
seen this before? The domain does not exist anywhere on Imail, it used to be
a host alias for a previous virtual host. The username Maldonado never
e
If you have virutual domains, no.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 3:27 PM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgraded / webmail no
What version of Imail are you using? Earlier than 7 I think.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katherine Kennedy
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:37 PM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2
There's a point. I went to the Ipswitch Download Upgrades web page and it
only specifies 2006.2 - do I need to do something else to get 2006.21 or is
that what I downloaded?
Thanks
~Susan
John T (lists) wrote:
Make sure you upgrade to 20
Make sure you upgrade to 2006.21. The install is simple and will restart
both Imail and IIS services for you.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: Imail_Forum
Known issue if you are redirecting:
3) The login.apsx now has code in it to clear authCookies(put there to fix a
bug). Please do not redirect to login.aspx. If you must redirect, redirect
to default.aspx. That way authenticated users will not be logged out.
However redirection is unnecessary. T
Since you are running Imail 8.15, this is a known problem and to fix you
will need to upgrade.
What is happening is that Imail is announcing itself with different names
based upon the sender domain but from the same IP.
Beginning with Imail 2006 (Imail 9) you can configure what helo is used.
Jo
Sounds purely like a MAC problem and if you look at one of those vaction
messages it will show that it originated on the MAC client.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007
.
Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications
http://www.etczone.com
812-932-1000
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:02 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail
upgrading our system. I saw a reference here and there,
but it didn't sound like the widespread revolt that I'm experiencing!
Thanks,
One bloody and bruised IT guy
-----Original Message-
From: "John T (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 6/18/2007 5:16:49 PM
To: Imail_Forum
In fact, Imail 2006.21 RC1 was just made available.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 3:17 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Bill, resolution of
Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost
complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3)
and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were
either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the
preferenc
If I remember correctly, someone reported this on the Imail web Forum and it
was further stated that Outlook works fine so it may be an OE issue.
I myself using Outlook 2007 checking 4 email accounts each with multiple
folders on my 2006.2 server works fine.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
I always did like that show.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Guluk
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:35 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: AW: AW: [IMail Forum] Possible to get rid of 8383?
Bruce, You're really going
's wrong with yours?
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow w
Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will
let you have a couple of mine.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] S
Did you log back in immediantly, or after a few minutes?
How big is the mail box?
Large mail boxes will actually take a few minutes to be processed using that
method.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucet
Oh, but Matt, MACs are perfect, so what could you possibly mean?
(Tongue planted firmly in cheek.)
;-)>
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:59 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alterna
As for the webmail errors, that is well known and documented and currently
under scrutiny for being fixed in 2006.21 which is in beta3 now.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:52 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subj
1) It would be best to ask on the Declude forums.
2) White listing based upon from address is not a good idea. Ever hear
of forged from addresses?
3) The from address of the below message as seen by Imail as it is part
of the envelope is over 135 characters long. This is absurd. Th
Actually, I think we should all demand an IP address for each mail domain on
our servers from ICANNA and explain that the reason is Yahoo wants each
domain that it receives email from to have its very own dedicated IP
address.
Let's see how fast Yahoo changes their song.
John T
From: [E
IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS
>
> Hi John-
>
> Still running 2006.1 here. Is that new in 2006.2?
>
> -d
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John T (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, May
> And for whoever it was that complained about rich text postings here,
> if
> somebody is posting from the webmail client, it's html-only unless you
> remember to pull down the message options and set the message to text-
> only
> each time. You can't set that as a default preference, only a per-
Troy, from my understanding, the performance advantage of SQL is only over
using an MS Access database when you have a large number of accounts.
Imail registry is the fastest.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 20
Please note: There is no such thing as a released Imail 2006.21.
It is still in beta.
Per instructions from Ipswitch, if you are going to participate in the beta
(Technical Preview) of 2006.21, you are to post any and all issues with said
beta (technical preview) on the Imail forum specifically s
This is the problems that are known and being worked on.
Ipswitch is in the middle of betas and working on the fix and it is looking
very promising.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 8:18 AM
To: IMail_Forum
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:46 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error
Is your Imail server also a DC? It is indeed has something have
Is your Imail server also a DC? It is indeed has something have something to
do with IIS.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:40 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-direc
255 total characters including spaces.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 1:28 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Max numbers of Alias Mail-Domains
Hi to all,
I remember, that the
So you do not think you need to follow the instructions in the KB you posted?
Where is the bouncing occurring?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail For
Eric, the problems you saw with Webmail on 2006.2 are probably related to
the fixes in 2006.21.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Coffman
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:26 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21
eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / <http://www.tio.nl/>
www.tio.nl
----- Original Message -
From: John T (lists) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:14 A
But when talking about computers, the order is
2
20
200
2006
2006.03
2006.04
2006.1
2006.2
2006.201
2006.21
2006.211
2006.2111
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitc
> Although my question isn't Imail specific, I thought this would be
> the
> best place to ask. My company wants to get an exchange server to go
> with
> our Imail server. Mainly due to the higher ups wanting to use all that
> Outlook does.
> Is it possible to get our two email servers using
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:16 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2
Travis, I am on the run right now, but if you look at posts from me on the
web forum you will see
Travis, I am on the run right now, but if you look at posts from me on the
web forum you will see information about this. I may have posted it here as
well but I do not remember right now. It would have been about a month ago.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
Please explain exactly how ASSP works?
Declude, MXGaurd and I am sure there are some others work perfectly fine
with the current version.
If what you said is true, ASSP sounds more like a incoming gateway rather
than a actual product that works with Imail via the 3rd party hand off in
the SMTPD3
Yes, in Imail 2006.2 email sent from Webmail is received by the Imail
SMTPD32 service which will then pass it to a 3rd party app such as ASSP or
Declude for processing.
In earlier versions, Webmail "dropped" the email into the spool and the
SMTPD32 service had nothing to do with it, it was sent us
1 - 100 of 455 matches
Mail list logo