Pat,
Monday, November 3, 2003 you wrote:
PH Anyone got any suggestions on where to start looking?
I've only had this occur with a network card. I'd replace that
first and test. If you are multiple be sure and replace all that
can connect to the mail server.
Hope you get it fixed -
Joe,
Tuesday, October 21, 2003 you wrote:
JO Below are my requirements, what hardware am I looking at?
You might want to look at Fortigate 60 or 100 from Fortinet
http://www.fortinet.com/
The 60 has a dual lan and it has some virus protection built in.
I like the idea of doing
Wednesday, October 15, 2003 Posted: 2:47 PM EDT (1847 GMT)
GENEVA, Switzerland (Reuters) -- Two major scientific research
centres said on Wednesday they had set a new world speed record for
sending data across the Internet, equivalent to transferring a
full-length DVD film in seven seconds.
Kevin,
Wednesday, October 15, 2003 you wrote:
KB Did you try to use perl.exe in your bat file
KB perl.exe yourperlscript.pl %1
Yes, on my system the following works:
--
1) c:\wsh\mytest.bat contains:
===
c:\perl\bin\perl.exe
scott,
Thursday, October 16, 2003 you wrote:
Ok, I've tried all of these and still no joy. It seems like my
.bat file is not being called. I added calls to Net::Syslog to
it, too, and nothing. When I run it at the command prompt, though
it works fine.
This might indicate a permissions
scott,
Thursday, October 16, 2003 you wrote:
SHE I'm stumped. Here what has/hasn't worked for getting a different delivery
SHE application to work.
What OS is this?
Terry
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Wednesday, October 15, 2003 you wrote:
SHE Has anyone called a perl script as a custom SMTP delivery application?
Easiest way for me is to us a bat file in the alias
c:\dir\my.bat
then in the bat file (%1 being the message file)
cd c:\dir\
myperlscript.pl %1
Michael,
Thursday, October 9, 2003 you wrote:
MMW I have had to copy login.html to index.html in order to have
MMW Apache serve the login page.
Imail serves web pages from its own built-in web server. You can't
move the pages to a different web server if that's what you're
trying to do.
Thursday, October 9, 2003 you wrote:
A it does generate a huge text file... is there any way to out put
A this to a DB or something useful that can be sorted by date and or
A size?
An MBX file is a huge text file. It is basically the Unix style
mail box. So you can use any program that can
Michael,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MMW Are you saying that I cannot run regular web services from the same box
MMW as I run IMail?
No, only that IMAIL uses its own built-in web server. So you
cannot take IMAIL pages and serve them from a non-IMAIL web
server and expect
Michael,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MMW When I try mail.get-noticed.com:8383, I get
MMW Bad HTTP header or invalid connection type!! Please contact
MMW system administrator Links: Login
MMW I am not sure I understand what I need to configure: IMAIL web
MMW server or APACHE? DNS for
Marcin,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MZ Does anyone have any suggestions on this - maybe someone has
MZ already created such an application
use http://www.declude.com/ for that
and get a command line scanner - most popular being FPROT
HTH
Terry Fritts
To
Marcin,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MZ Thanks for the advice - I will look at this declude system today.
MZ What is F-Prot?
http://www.f-prot.com/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Michael,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MMW Port opened:
MMW http://mail.get-noticed.com/login.html:8080
MMW apache reply:
MMW You don't have permission to access /login.html:8080 on this server.
Yeah but try the correct format:
http://mail.get-noticed.com:8080/
Terry
To
Michael,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MMW Tried the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Didn't work.
MMW Tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't work
MMW Any other suggestions?
Is that user authorized for web mail?
Check your Imail admin preferences for the user account.
To Unsubscribe:
Michael,
Friday, October 10, 2003 you wrote:
MMW Yup. It's my account that I am trying.
Well, look in your log files and see why you are failing.
If you don't have logging turned on then turn it on. See the
docs for log file locations.
Terry
To Unsubscribe:
Joe,
Tuesday, September 16, 2003 you wrote:
JW They send a message to the BACKUP server with a known BAD primary
JW mail address for a domain in the HOSTS file and a SPAM CC address
JW that they want to send to. The backup server accepts the mail
JW because it is addressed to a domain in the HOSTS
Seeing some testing probes from Reynolds.net.au against our Imail
server. Description of testing here:
http://reynolds.net.au/spam/testing/
The old percent relay test actually managed to get the server to
accept a message, i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED]
although it was not allowed to relay thanks to a
Friday, August 29, 2003 you wrote:
I Can anyone point me in the right direction to solve this problem?
Most commonly posted reason for BSOD's in the forum is use of
certain NICs with IMAIL. I think LinkSys most commonly if I
remember correctly.
HTH
Terry Fritts
To
Monday, August 25, 2003 you wrote:
I There should be a way to filter just the attachment itself, and not
I the entire rest of the message.
Attachments aren't separate from the message but a part of the
message. So the message has to be parsed into the various segments.
Segments
Bill,
Saturday, August 23, 2003 you wrote:
BB 100% of the improvement was due to the new box. I just added the
BB TIME_WAIT setting 2 days ago, and the only visible difference
BB since the change is less connections in the TIME_WAIT state when
BB running netstat -an.
BB But we process ~100K
Pat,
Friday, August 22, 2003 you wrote:
PH My only question is can you configure the first SMTP server to
PH listen on a port such as 4000 but then deliver to the second SMTP
PH server on port 25
You can configure MS SMTP server for both incoming and outgoing
ports and IP's. It has a
Friday, August 22, 2003 you wrote:
Connection refused errors when trying to forward queued email to
Imail periodically during the day. However, I can telnet manually
to port 25 without any problems just after receiving the error.
Someone on another list recently posted this link that might
Thursday, August 21, 2003 you wrote:
PH I have a requirement to put two SMTP servers one box ( at least one of
PH them being Imail).
PH As far as I can see there is now way of getting two instances of
PH Imail running on the same box
It is certainly not possible out of the box as far as I
Thursday, July 31, 2003 you wrote:
TR It seems odd that you can process this without setting the mail
TR server to allow this. What happens if I have USer Cannot Chnge
TR PAssword on the server?
There's a setting on my Imail on the server.
To Unsubscribe:
Saturday, July 26, 2003 you wrote:
R It seems obvious that IMail cannot accomplish this task and has turned into
R a bashing of Microsoft Outlook.
There are solutions available within IMAIL's framework. You could,
for instance, employ the copy all account and use a program alias
to a
Wednesday, July 9, 2003 you wrote:
T Much better perfomance with VNC or with IMAIL ?
The last time I tested Imail remote admin there were a good many
things you could not do with it so unless it is improved greatly
you will need VNC for full administration. But maybe it is
Wednesday, July 9, 2003 you wrote:
T Is there better perfomance with IMAIL when operating system is
T windows2000...
Oh, I see.
It has been a long time since we upgraded from NT4 to Win2k but I
do not really recall any significant improvement in IMAIL
performance actually. But
Wednesday, July 9, 2003 you wrote:
T Actually vnc is quite good thing against terminal service cause its
T free, it works verry fine everywhere etc
I use VNC, PCA, and TermServ very frequently every day for numerous
remote hosts. I have several versions of VNC and PCA in fact.
Now,
Daniel,
Wednesday, July 9, 2003 you wrote:
DA Do you have any experience running PCA and VNC on the same server?
Yes, on an NT4 server.
DA Any conflicts or stability issues?
This particular NT4 server uses all of its memory for INETINFO and
content indexing and never releases. I
Ben,
Tuesday, July 1, 2003 you wrote:
it no longer allowed mail to remote hosts even with
authentication set up in the SMTP settings of the e-mail client. ...
Check the logs to see if the clients are trying to authenticate and
why they are failing.
Does anyone have any thoughts
Monday, June 30, 2003 you wrote:
WL For those with remote users, do you maintain a list of IP
WL addresses they connect from if you are using store and forward on
WL the same server? Is that the only option?
Use smtp auth for remote users.
To Unsubscribe:
Michael,
Wednesday, June 25, 2003 you wrote:
ML I just found this on my Event Viewer, using Imail 6.06
ML Application popup: SMTP32.exe - Application Error : The
ML application failed to initialize properly (0xc142).
This should help you understand the error:
Wednesday, June 18, 2003 you wrote:
TR Haven't had any false positives since I started using it about 4
TR months ago. So your opinion of wisest is out of place.
SPAMCOP is usually 4th or 5th in my tests in terms of number of
messages failing. In June to date it is 4th at 32.76%. And it
Tuesday, June 17, 2003 you wrote:
Can someone point me to the Imail list? It used to be here but now
this is apparently usenet.
RSP Let me guess: You just upgraded to IMail v8? If so, check your
RSP root account to see if all the E-mail was moved there by IMail
RSP v8's anti-spam tests.
LOL. I
Friday, June 6, 2003 you wrote:
FR Is there anyone out there willing to say that this mail server is
FR a stable product?
Not only is it stable but 8 is much improved. Does that mean
it is free of all problems? No. That said the only problem I've
had with 8 is the Queue Manager's
Wednesday, June 4, 2003 you wrote:
SWC 06:04 10:46 SMTP-(00FD) Trying delphiauto.com (0)
SWC 06:04 10:47 SMTP-(00FD) MX connect fail 164.109.59.132
That's the A record for delphi.com - there are 4 MX records all of
which are working for me. This may be an issue with your Imail 6
version
Wednesday, June 4, 2003 you wrote:
JN After a couple of days of reading other vendors product sheets, I
JN have came to the conclusion that IMail is WY behind in the
JN Spam department.
In my experience it is really hard to actually judge a product -
especially anything having to do
Friday, May 30, 2003 you wrote:
FCI ru saying we *do* have to install Outlook ?
FCI I'm just not sure what u mean when u say 'the MAPI client'.
For all practical purposes the answer is YES.
The old internet mail client which I belive is no longer
available could also be used as a
One thing for sure is that Imail 8's delivery speed is MUCH, MUCH,
MUCH better.
Thanks, thanks, thanks, thanks Ipswitch!
Forum posting time is incredible to me compared to what I used to see.
My last message was delivered in 1 minute.
Terry Fritts
To Unsubscribe:
Friday, May 30, 2003 you wrote:
IS I'm not certain MS Outlook Express will install those MAPI
IS components
Right it does not.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Monday, March 31, 2003 you wrote:
K Do all mail servers accept SMTP authentication by default and
K cannot be change?
My experience is very limited but with my other mail servers smtp
auth either is unavailable or is on by default. However, with the
latter I can turn it off if I want.
K
Monday, March 31, 2003 you wrote:
K I did a test with Outlook Express and it did stop the authentication if
K I tick the option. If I remove the SMPT AUTH option it will
K authenticate. Is there other way of authenticating with the mail server?
IMAIL ALWAYS provide smtp authentication to any
Sunday, March 30, 2003 you wrote:
K If I set it to no Relay instead of relay for local host it will
K cause a lot of angry customers.
You have to teach them to use smtp-auth.
K What I don't understand is why I suddenly have problems sending to
K mailservers that I always send to.
More
Tuesday, March 25, 2003 you wrote:
B So did we ever get a straight answer on why IMail doesn't even try
B to use the 2ndry MX record? I couldn't find it
I've tested this extensively on my system and I have not observed
this behavior since somewhere in the 7.1 series either in devised
Tuesday, March 25, 2003 you wrote:
T let me rephrase, I can D.o.s. my own server on ports 25, 110, 8181,
T 8383, 8384, using crashimail. so long as the app runs, no
T connections. once you stop, it pops back to life.
Testing IMAIL 7.15 on my old exceedingly quirky and underpowered
Compaq
Wednesday, March 26, 2003 you wrote:
THS port threads
THS you run crashimail.exe mail.yoursite 110 250-400
THS say bye bye to pop3, it prevents any pop3 connection.
It didn't kill the service or server though (at least for me).
Just out of curiosity how
Friday, March 21, 2003 you wrote:
K Well I opend a can of worms! What I was really getting at is if I'm
K using the administrator on the server and imail encrypts its on
K passwords in the registry then it should have the ability to allow
K an administrator to see them.
Actually you can see
Saturday, March 22, 2003 you wrote:
B that works on Linux mailservers, using Sendmail and SMTP?
not sendmail but postfix -
IMGATE - http://imgate.meiway.com/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Dave,
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
D I looked at the SortMonster Message Sniffer but it only talks about
D being able to install it with declude. I'm sure it must support
D native imail but it doesn't say how.
It does not work with IMAIL directly. You have to have an
intermediary
Dustin,
Tuesday, March 18, 2003 you wrote:
DF On the binary file I opened it up using a Binary Hex reader but I
DF think it must be a bit more involved.
No, it is 4 bytes IP address followed by 4 bytes Mask address.
The end of the current list is delimited by 8 bytes of h00.
DF It
Keith,
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
KWS What I want to determine is whether Declude Junkmail is worth
KWS using without the mail-abuse.org subscriptions, or whether those
KWS subscriptions provide the majority of the filtering power.
We don't use MAPS and we are stopping about 99+% of
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
LC Who considers this a security vulnerability worth fixing ?
Those who prey.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
CV Hey, does anyone have the URL for this SNIFFER program?
http://www.sortmonster.com/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Michael,
Friday, March 14, 2003 you wrote:
MK I'm anxious to stop spam. I've read a lot of posts here about IMGATE and
MK DECLUDE. Aside from one being free and the other having a minimal price,
MK can anybody give me an unbiased comparison of the two?
IMGATE is Postfix implemented on a
Sunday, March 9, 2003 you wrote:
SW Are you talking about an IIS virtual domain, perchance? If so, it's
SW definitely unrelated to your issue.
Maybe it is related. I have had problems getting MS SMTP server to
handle messages destined to my IMAIL server on the same network
when
Sanford,
Sunday, March 9, 2003 you wrote:
SW Anyway, here's the problem once and for all:
stio.se
Server: [195.22.69.10]
Address: 195.22.69.10
stio.se MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = stio.se
stio.se nameserver = ns3.webcows-dns.com
stio.se nameserver = ns4.webcows-dns.com
stio.se
Maurits,
Thursday, March 6, 2003 you wrote:
MM or does anyone have any ideas to do this better?.
I believe you would be much better off setting up a program alias
which invoked a program to manage the complex job you describe.
It really works very nicely and is not that difficult
Maurits,
Thursday, March 6, 2003 you wrote:
MM IMail passes me the location of a tmp file that holds the
MM email that was send to the program alias.
Yes, that's correct.
MM In short, i can bypass the entire internal IMail rule system, and
MM process in something i write myself :)
Michael,
Wednesday, March 5, 2003 you wrote:
MK I'm new to IMail Server and this group (less than 24 hours)
Welcome.
MK and don't want to create waves.
Surfs already up anyway - a few waves never hurt anyone.
MK Steve Gibson of GRC.COM is very well respected in Internet
MK
Samantha,
Wednesday, March 5, 2003 you wrote:
BS I want to delete accounts from a Host on my Imail 7.x server. Can I just
BS delete the directories on the server or do I have to use the IMail
BS Administrator to delete accounts?
It you delete only the directories and files then you still have
Tuesday, March 4, 2003 you wrote:
EP Report them to Road runner. They'll get shut off in a hurry.
That is not my experience with Road Runner.
I've tried once before but I'll not waste the effort again.
They do reply but it is just a waste of time.
Terry Fritts
To Unsubscribe:
Monday, March 3, 2003 you wrote:
TP Running Imail 7.10 on WinNT 4.0 server. The web messaging service is in
TP need of constant restarting. Also most of the time the web messaging
TP service is giving problems you cannot get into web monitor either.
TP Suggestions would be welcome.
This is
Monday, March 3, 2003 you wrote:
KR Some folks complain that they are receiving double emails in their
KR mailboxes. They are all using Outlook (2000 or XP).
Again, another one of those wonderfully periodic topics on the
Imail forum. If I had time I would research this entire periodic
Monday, March 3, 2003 you wrote:
W I actually get an error from outlook, a timeout with the server.
W Next time I download emails, I receive all the emails received on
W the previous sync.
Often indicates a relatively small time between checking messages
and mail box size. Kind of like Danger
Monday, March 3, 2003 you wrote:
SPM Anyone have any ideas why whenever I post anything
SPM to this forum it gets posted twice?
I only get it once I am afraid.
SPM Is my advice so good that it deserves to be reread
SPM or are my problems so important that everyone simply
SPM must read
Darryl,
Sunday, March 2, 2003 you wrote:
DK No, does not even come close to his numbers, if it did it would
DK take app 30 seconds to parse the amount that I have listed
DK (5,000,000 at 250,000 per second comes to about 20 seconds)..
Firstly, let me apologize for an incomplete and
Darryl,
Sunday, March 2, 2003 you wrote:
DK Good answer,
Well, I hope it helped.
Just to demonstrate how seemingly minor details can make such
large performance differences consider the following 2 programs
that do exactly the same thing.
I'm working on my own February
Brian,
Sunday, March 2, 2003 you wrote:
BC Since I'm using Declude for Spam and Virus scanning, can an IMGate
BC box take on the Declude processes as well.
Declude is a Windows program to run with your imail server.
IMGate is typically run on FreeBSD but has been successfully ported to
Linux
Thomas,
Sunday, March 2, 2003 you wrote:
TT Got any sample code, or something I can use?
It isn't exactly trivial. Since you seem to be unfamiliar with select
tag attributes it may be more than you want to contemplate yourself.
Refer to the manual on customizing templates and in particular the
Travis,
Saturday, March 1, 2003 you wrote:
TWR Nope. I am not accepting authentication,
You cannot turn smtp-auth off on IMAIL.
It is always on.
You can turn off whether IMAIL reports it or not but if the
client authenticates via auth then it will occur.
some clients
Travis,
Saturday, March 1, 2003 you wrote:
TWR SMTP auth is off.
You cannot turn it off.
You can turn off reporting - but turning off reporting does not
turn off auth.
hth
Terry
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Travis,
Saturday, March 1, 2003 you wrote:
TWR I am guessing that the session treated as local has something to
TWR do with it?
There is no guessing about it.
session treated as local is what happens when smtp auth is used
to authenticate.
I don't understand what it is you
Darryl,
Saturday, March 1, 2003 you wrote:
DK I actually have that exact version, version 1.01 beta 6. Yeah, dual CPU's
DK lots of ram and it chugs along. Does a month in about an hour. Is this
DK strange, slow what?
You should probably expect it to read and parse in the 250 K to
500 K
Bonno,
Friday, February 28, 2003 you wrote:
BB Has nobody requested this feature as long as Imail has been around
BB or is it not important enough?
It has definitely been discussed. However, since you can use a
logger with IMAIL the consensus has been to move to that vehicle
as a
Chris,
Wednesday, February 12, 2003 you wrote:
CMI When you said you edited your config.nt file, did you simply change the
CMI files= to 60, and add the shell= command to the default file, or did you
CMI delete the default lines and only put those 2 lines in your config.nt file?
All of mine
Dan,
Wednesday, February 12, 2003 you wrote:
DS Netscape is just opening the .mbx as a plain text file, just like notepad
DS does. That doesn't do me any good. I want an app to open it and parse out
DS each email, much like an email client would, like the imail standalone
DS client does. The
Christopher,
Tuesday, February 11, 2003 you wrote:
CMI We've already applied the fix here that was described at
CMI http://www.declude.com/dq.htm, with no luck. The problem is still occuring.
I remember this very well. I had followed the dq.htm instructions
as had a lot of other
Hannes,
Sunday, February 9, 2003 you wrote:
HF has anyone experience with that new software:
I looked at it but it would not be useful for me so I did not try
it. I have tried spam assassin in the past and have not had good
results with it from my windows server.
I am thinking
Friday, February 7, 2003 you wrote:
I I do not have the Extra Funds to purchase either of the Versions.
I Could someone please suggest a Good software for Spam Control.
Well, your price range is less than DECLUDE. The lite version is only
$295. That doesn't provide a very large universe.
About
Travis,
Friday, February 7, 2003 you wrote:
TWR Sweet.but IMGate is *nix based though, yes? That's a party killer.
Yes, but Len is contemplating a service where he will front end for
you.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Peter,
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 you wrote:
PM HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Ipswitch\Messenger\Settings\Client Uses Nat = 1, instead
PM of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
Thanks for that.
The docs that mention this is on my server machine
and I was switching back and forth. There is nothing about this in
the
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 you wrote:
PS nybody know a function in ASP that does a similar thing as the
PS ParagraphFormat function? I've got a SQL database that has fields
PS with large blocks of text (many paragraphs long). In the sql
PS tables, the paragraphs are separated by dual carriage
Greg,
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 you wrote:
GF Anyone using the Instant Messenger?
I finally got it to where I can send a message from my workstation
to the server and I can see the status of another user connected
to the server.
I had to open TCP incoming to 5177 on the server
Monday, January 27, 2003 you wrote:
LC yep, that level of knob twisting would be nice, but don't hold
LC your breath that Imail 8 will offer it. Even with postfix's 300
LC params, the queue lifetime is only per-server
That's a really good argument for using different tools to achieve
Roger,
Saturday, January 25, 2003 you wrote:
RH I'll be looking at how to disable this as potentially blocked. I have
RH not found it yet.
I agree with Bill that it probably isn't black ice as we've not had
any auth problems with our set up.
However, I notice you are at IMAIL 5.05. I recall
Len,
Sunday, January 26, 2003 you wrote:
LC where Imail never returned from the AUTH CRAM-MD 5command.
Yeah, but isn't that what it did when you tried to auth an ip-less
virtual domain with external db?
On a totally different not XMAIL is released now for openBSD by the way.
Terry
Roger,
Saturday, January 25, 2003 you wrote:
RH Maybe Sandy can tell me what settings he uses
RH in TheBat! ??
(I use NAV on my workstation so I cannot use settings of mail
retrieval)
Here are my TB! settings:
--
Transport
Send mail
Authentication
Paul,
PN Is this really a problem?
PN Am I missing something?
Sandy already replied but it matters quite a bit if you use web
messaging and/or web calendaring. The topic has been discussed quite a
bit if you want to review the archives.
Terry Fritts
To Unsubscribe:
Michael,
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 you wrote:
MEC Would you mind sharing with the list how you configured your MS
MEC SMTP server to store and forward, or perhaps mention a KB article
MEC that addresses this?
I'm going to stop referencing the archives. I don't think all the
messages are
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 you wrote:
BS Is Imail 7.x MAPI compliant? If yes or no, please explain why?
Imail cannot be used as a MAPI agent if that's your question.
You choice now is pretty much limited to Outlook I think.
hth
To Unsubscribe:
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 you wrote:
CS What are the pros and cons of using the Imail internal database
CS versus MSSQL?
Internal is faster and can be easily accommodated on one server. Can
be programmatically managed via perl, wsh, etc.
External (if MS Sql really needs its own dedicated
paul,
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 you wrote:
P 1 Is there an easy way besides in Imail, to read/edit the smtpd32.acc
P file?
a. You can do it from the IMAIL web interface
b. I've written a perl program that reads it and lists it. It is
a programmer's program so unless you are
Heimir,
Wednesday, January 22, 2003 you wrote:
HE And I am conerend that Blackice will do the same.
I never saw any issues with sending and BlackIce unless the user
wasn't authenticated or wasn't from a safe IP. Even so the automatic
blacklisting is temporary.
We installed BlackIce
David,
Monday, January 20, 2003 you wrote:
DD On the server running Imail, it appears that someone has dropped in a
DD security probe utility called XScan ... I have removed it twice, but
DD it keeps coming back.
DD Thanks for any recommendations of forums / databases to check.
You may have
Sunday, January 19, 2003 you wrote:
TT 1) Is it worth it what will I get from upgrading?
current software.
known bug fixes.
I don't know how to answer your other questions.
My personal view is that software should be kept pretty current.
I would be uncomfortable at 7.04 just
Mike,
Thursday, January 9, 2003 you wrote:
M begin rant
M Ah, looks like you're another one of the DC's. In my opinion, the DC's are
M partially responsible for that whole internet bubble busting thing.
ROFL.
What is worse is this quote:
My users (and myself obviously) aren't going to be able
Keith,
Friday, December 27, 2002 you wrote:
KJ Does anyone else have any ideas on this issue, thanks for the aid.
I googled for Number: 0x800CCC15 and found several entries.
Cursory reading indicates several areas of research:
socks, outlook express issue, corrupted mail box - among
Sunday, December 22, 2002 you wrote:
MR At this point I suppose I could try making an actual mail acct called
MR postmaster and see if that works... But shouldn't an alias suffice?
No problem from here by telnet:
ehlo
250-msb1.mysecretbase.net says hello
250-SIZE 0
250-8BITMIME
250-DSN
Saturday, December 21, 2002 you wrote:
M I cannot understand where this ISO-2022-JP from. As a WebMail-user it
M cannot be a wrong setting on the client side OS. In Imail I haven't
M found any settings for this. It happens only with this user.
I would be inclined to consider the user's
1 - 100 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
