Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

Michael Hunter wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:40:46 +0200 michael schuster wrote: michael schuster wrote: michael schuster wrote: I'm currently running b118 on this machine; on the internal pkg server compare the above w. the below, there's your answer.^^^ m...@mph:~$ pfexec pkg p

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:40:46 +0200 michael schuster wrote: > michael schuster wrote: > > michael schuster wrote: > >> I'm currently running b118 on this machine; on the internal pkg server > >> I saw that the update to 121 has happened, so I wanted to benefit from > >> that ... > >> > >> "pkg p

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

michael schuster wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Ivan Wang wrote: michael schuster wrote: it seems that 'pkg refresh --full' was necessary to get things going again Though it's still not good experience why a manual download of server metadata is required. one wouldn't do that had he not know

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

Shawn Walker wrote: Ivan Wang wrote: michael schuster wrote: it seems that 'pkg refresh --full' was necessary to get things going again Though it's still not good experience why a manual download of server metadata is required. one wouldn't do that had he not know there is an update on se

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

So when will 121 hit the public /dev depot? cheers, James ___ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

Ivan Wang wrote: michael schuster wrote: it seems that 'pkg refresh --full' was necessary to get things going again Though it's still not good experience why a manual download of server metadata is required. one wouldn't do that had he not know there is an update on server in the first pla

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

> michael schuster wrote: > > it seems that 'pkg refresh --full' was necessary to > get things going again Though it's still not good experience why a manual download of server metadata is required. one wouldn't do that had he not know there is an update on server in the first place. Ivan. >

[indiana-discuss] snv_118 dying

My machine is running b118, and for the past two days it's been freezing in such a way that it doesn't respond to ssh or NFS or CIFS requests, but it does keep renewing its DHCP lease. It writes no messages to /var/adm/messages during this period: Aug 24 05:43:08 will-fs smbsrv: [ID 138215 kern.no

Re: [indiana-discuss] rpool/swap size is not reserved

I missed that refreservation is used both on Solaris 10 and Open Solaris which makes sense. -- Robert Milkowski http://milek.blogspot.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http

Re: [indiana-discuss] Perl DBI not installed.

Michael Mellinger wrote: Well, that's not really true in this case. I see support for MacOS, Windows and Linux in the code. I'm getting closer. Hope to be done today. This bug was closed but it doesn't look like it was fixed. http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 How does

Re: [indiana-discuss] Perl DBI not installed.

Well, that's not really true in this case. I see support for MacOS, Windows and Linux in the code. I'm getting closer. Hope to be done today. This bug was closed but it doesn't look like it was fixed. http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 How does this get fixed in the OpenSo

Re: [indiana-discuss] rpool/swap size is not reserved

> Hi, > > I'm a little bit surprised that rpool/swap is not > reserved (zfs reservation) both on Open Solaris and > Solaris 10. Shouldn't default be: > reservation=swap_size? > > > -- > Robert Milkowski > http://milek.blogspot.com Well on my OpenSolaris build 118 VM the swap zvol is 512MB with

Re: [indiana-discuss] Perl DBI not installed.

Michael: The bugster cr 6780900 is not fixed yet. I had added your information to the bugster cr. Michael Mellinger wrote: Well, that's not really true in this case. I see support for MacOS, Windows and Linux in the code. I'm getting closer. Hope to be done today. This bug was closed

Re: [indiana-discuss] Perl DBI not installed.

Well, that's not really true in this case. I see support for MacOS, Windows and Linux in the code. I'm getting closer. Hope to be done today. This bug was closed but it doesn't look like it was fixed. http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 How does this get fixed in the OpenSol

[indiana-discuss] rpool/swap size is not reserved

Hi, I'm a little bit surprised that rpool/swap is not reserved (zfs reservation) both on Open Solaris and Solaris 10. Shouldn't default be: reservation=swap_size? -- Robert Milkowski http://milek.blogspot.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

Hi David, On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM, wrote: >> Will there be an update to B121 in /dev soon? Or will it be skipped >> again? > > Yes, we're working on a few update issues but expect to push it in the > coming days. We know SXCE is ending, is BFU still the recommended way to upgrade the sy

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

michael schuster wrote: michael schuster wrote: I'm currently running b118 on this machine; on the internal pkg server I saw that the update to 121 has happened, so I wanted to benefit from that ... "pkg publisher" tells me that the internal server is the preferred publisher for opensolaris.

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Aubrey Li wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: >>> >>> SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any >>> time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz >>> us

Re: [indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

michael schuster wrote: I'm currently running b118 on this machine; on the internal pkg server I saw that the update to 121 has happened, so I wanted to benefit from that ... "pkg publisher" tells me that the internal server is the preferred publisher for opensolaris.org, but when I run "pfex

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Chris Ridd wrote: > > On 24 Aug 2009, at 14:30, Aubrey Li wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: >>> >>> SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any >>> time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some prob

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

Will there be an update to B121 in /dev soon? Or will it be skipped again? Yes, we're working on a few update issues but expect to push it in the coming days. ___ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

On 24 Aug 2009, at 14:30, Aubrey Li wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz using Intel graphics - it starts, but displays w

[indiana-discuss] "pkg image-update" strangeness

I'm currently running b118 on this machine; on the internal pkg server I saw that the update to 121 has happened, so I wanted to benefit from that ... "pkg publisher" tells me that the internal server is the preferred publisher for opensolaris.org, but when I run "pfexec pkg image-update", all

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 21:30 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any > > time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz > > using Intel graphics - it start

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

Aubrey Li wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz using Intel graphics - it starts, but displays white screen; I haven't had the

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any time > /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz using > Intel graphics - it starts, but displays white screen; I haven't had the time > yet t

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz using Intel graphics - it starts, but displays white screen; I haven't had the time yet to figure out this). Chavdar Ivanov -- This message posted fro

Re: [indiana-discuss] /dev update

Apparently it will be some time this week... On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:05 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote: > Will there be an update to B121 in /dev soon? Or will it be skipped > again? > > -- > Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D > + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 re

[indiana-discuss] /dev update

Will there be an update to B121 in /dev soon? Or will it be skipped again? -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2009.06 rel + All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)

[indiana-discuss] DFS client planned?

Hi! Do we have a plan to include a DFS client in OpenSolaris? Timeframe? Cheers, Gilles. -- *Gilles Gravier, CISSP *Global Government Industry Solutions Architect Voice : +41 (22) 999 9051 Mobile : +41 (79) 472 8437 Fax :