l in whatever form it takes because I think we can reach
out to engage quite a large number of people in emerging markets. Some
of the work is already going on in other projects, so we have a good
opportunity to grow the project here.
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
In my
ier this year" when in fact engineers have been working on this for
quite some time. The install process is greatly improved from S10, and
we as a community are going to improve it even more. Typical clueless
media with almost zero knowledge of the history of the OpenSolaris project.
multi-national corporation. It goes both
ways. The open source community really needs to open up more and be more
flexible. One of the greatest lessons I've learned on this project is
that the open source community doesn't know it all.
Jim
--
Ji
David Lloyd wrote:
> Brandorr,
>
>> Did I miss something? Did we even figure out what the Indiana Brand is
>> yet? (e.g. Does it have a name, logo, etc?)
>
> I don't know what Indiana is meant to represent; I'm quite happy with
> SXCE myself. Indiana is something that may as well start with Ian
Ivan Wang wrote:
>> David Lloyd wrote:
>>> Brandorr,
>>>
Did I miss something? Did we even figure out what
>> the Indiana Brand is
yet? (e.g. Does it have a name, logo, etc?)
>>> I don't know what Indiana is meant to represent;
>> I'm quite happy with
>>> SXCE myself. Indiana is somethin
I'm happy to get involved and I'll be going to foss. Do we know who is
going and who is submitting papers?
Jim
Sara Dornsife wrote:
> Let's coordinate efforts to have a strong presence here.
> Sara
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [foss.in] FOSS.IN/2007 Speaker registratio
Sara Dornsife wrote:
> What's your topic?
> Sara
I talk about OpenSolaris from a community-development perspective. I
don't talk about technology since I know nothing about technology.
History, community, business, markets, user groups, future direction,
success/failure, etc. I try to put the
eating something new here, so let's not clutter it up from the
beginning. Also, Indiana will be used to introduce OpenSolaris
technology to potentially very large numbers of people in emerging
markets, so the branding experience should consider international
realities as well.
Jim
--
Jim
Patrick Finch wrote:
> Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>> Glynn Foster wrote:
>>> Brandorr wrote:
>>>> On 9/12/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> One issue that probably requires some thought is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Yah, perhaps "simple" is the wrong word. When I used Ubuntu I had the
>> /feeling/ of simplicity and elegance (though wireless never worked for
>> me). Someone sat down and thought the brand through at least to a
>> certain extent, and I appreciated that. I love the J
Shawn Walker wrote:
> No offense to the fine folks at GNOME, but I really, really, hope that
> the foot *dies* the death it deserves to as a product branding item.
Agree. Not a foot fan. Needs to be something based on OpenSolaris ...
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/j
I'll let
you know. I'm getting new education/universities material from Teresa,
as well. I'll give it all a test run at an IEEE conf here in Japan in a
couple of weeks.
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
___
indiana-di
S h i v wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> The FOSS.IN/2007 Call for Participation is announced and the
> speaker/talk registration is now open. I see that the announcement has
> already been picked up on Indiana mailing list.
>
> As announced in my earlier mail FOSS.IN/2007 is a 5 day program spread
> acr
Ken Mays wrote:
> Glynn pushed out the video recordings from the OpenSolaris Dev Summit...
> Have to tell him to fix site permissions so we can download those MP3s...
>
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/advocacy/opensolaris_summit/
Seems fixed now ...
Jim
_
John Plocher wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Is this the actual proposal or a proposal for a proposal?
Given that I am the new guy on the block in the Advocacy Community, I'll
defer to your guidance here. It seems to have support (several +1's,
no -1 - yet)
Is this the actual proposal or a proposal for a proposal?
Jim
John Plocher wrote:
Sara Dornsife wrote:
I will write up the proposal and post it to these lists.
Not lists, list. As in the Advocacy group's yet to be proposed
"OpenSolaris Branding Project". Oops, I g
Shawn Walker wrote:
> A article that puts my thoughts into words far more eloquently than I
> ever could:
>
> http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/
I agree. Also, I've done some talking about Indiana this week in China,
and more than a few people here are very much looking f
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I have no problem if Sun would start to publish something called:
> "Sun OpenSolaris "
Why would "Sun OpenSolaris" make sense? Actually, that expression has
been used (incorrectly) in the media, and it's only added to the
confusion. Also, isn't it a benefit for the
James Carlson wrote:
> John Sonnenschein writes:
>> Note that this is quite aside from how I or anyone else feels with
>> respect to the name. I'm not asking for the name "OpenSolaris" to be
>> attached to the indiana project or the contrary, I'm asking the OGB,
>> whose job it is to stand up for t
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> All right.
>>
>> I don't even know where to begin.
>
> Welcome to the OpenSolaris Community where you can do great work, endless
> hours year after year and get endless heartache for it.
>
> Ian, to be frank, you're new here. This sort of thing has gone on for
> years and
Al Hopper wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> The ability to use the OpenSolaris name is a privilege; not a right.
>^^^
>
> This is absolutely correct. And, along with the ownership of that
> trademark comes t
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> As someone who's come to OpenSolaris from outside the community, I
> think the decision is right on. And Ian's comment that he doesn't get
> it. It seems to me that community is important, but OpenSolaris has a
> larger identity issue vis-a-vis the non-c
James Mansion wrote:
> Surely, having a kernel developer community is the least of Sun's
> actual problems.
> Sun has developers and having most development done in the context of
> a funded and
> managed environment is very valuable. What is needed most of all is a
> *user* community
> that
Derek Cicero wrote:
>As I mentioned at the summit and on the website-discuss list, once this
>project gets out of the 'preview' phase we'll probably move the
>OpenSolaris distro to a separate mini-site on os.org and revert the old
>/os/ home page back.
>
>
>
I like this idea.
Jim
--
http://
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>SchilliX is a project and it still exists and Sun still does not help with
>SchilliX.
>
>The main issue is that Sun did miss the time to create a commiunity
>distribution
>as Sun did not help with SchilliX. The time for createing a real single
>community distro did p
Do we have an idea of when/where the next Indiana conference will be?
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
Jesse L Silver wrote:
> Hi All-
>
> Many of you have been asking whether the OpenSolaris Developer Summit
> May '08 is actually happening. The answer is, fortunately, yes! I'm
> sorry we have been so light on details up to this point. Mainly it's
> because we haven't been able to nail down a ven
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As opensolaris.com starts to focus more on the 'download, install and run'
> experience, catering towards the consumer rather than the producer, a few
> people
> in Sun have been working on a design separate to that of the current
> opensolaris.org. The following
Arthur Rudnik wrote:
multi-color bubbles
> So it looks like we'll have to provide massive feedback to get a logo that's
> actually looking good ...
>
I've been looking at the bubbles for a week or so now. They are growing
on me. Give 'em a chance ...
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgri
hey ... some images from yesterday in San Francisco ...
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/entry/opensolaris_launch_at_communityone_pics
Jim
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-
fyi: we are doing an OpenSolaris launch in Tokyo. Should have a hundred
or so people there.
Jim
Original Message
Subject:[osol-announce] Japan Launch event for OpenSolaris 2008.05
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 18:27:41 +0900
From: Takanobu Masuzuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Ok, the deed is done ... we launched OpenSolaris 2008.05 in Tokyo on
Friday. It was a successful event. Simon Phipps was our special guest
and gave the opening talk, we had two community speakers, and the Sun
Japan team created, presented, and managed the entire event. We also
invited members o
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> 5 ) run it
>
> $ firefox
>
Cool. Works great. :)
Thanks,
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> Don't want to rain on the parade, but FF3 seems to be running slower on my
> 2008.05 than FF2. Also, it has crashed more than a couple of time after I
> installed the Flash plugin (especially when I tabbed out Gmail.com )
>
My experience: nice quick download, easy ins
Ok, I think I'm almost there. All steps to this point went ok. Took
about 40 mins for download/install. I'm in Tokyo on wireless.
> $ beadm list
> BEActive Active on Mountpoint Space
> Name reboot Used
> --
Sanjay G. Nadkarni wrote:
> I was able to successfully perform an pkg image-update from 2008.05 (86) to
> 91. For the heck of it, I tried without updating to the latest SUNWipkg.
> The only issue I hit was the pkg timeout which was addressed by setting the
> PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT to 120.
>
> O
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:33 AM, David Orman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you give an average person the current 2008.5 cd, would you wager
>> they'd successfully be able to install it on their hardware, update it to
>> the most recent release, and perform all other necessary/wise things?
But
David Orman wrote:
> I'm not arguing it should be there already, I'm simply arguing we
> should strive to get there in the future - and updated ISOs would
> allow people earlier access to the fixed bits. :)
That's fine. I'll upgrade. I need the practice. :)
> As to your second point, required rea
MC wrote:
> Not to mention the extra languages which aren't needed in most areas, so a
> run of CDs for western universities could be made with only
> english+french+spanish, while a run for china could be only etc+etc+etc
I'd add Korean and Chinese to your western run since there are a lot of
fyi: I just set up an eeepc list
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/eeepc-discuss for Robert
Sohigian in China. I see these machines a lot in Japan, and I just met a
Japanese developer who's really into them
http://masafumi-ohta.blogspot.com/ (he blogs in English, though).
Jim
--
ht
On 08/15/08 00:32, Alan Steinberg wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_95
Thanks ... this update from 94-95 went quite well for me. :)
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
_
Indy
to be successful in whatever form it takes because I think we can reach
out to engage quite a large number of people in emerging markets. Some
of the work is already going on in other projects, so we have a good
opportunity to grow the project here.
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.co
n to expose" these "weak points"
"earlier this year" when in fact engineers have been working on this for
quite some time. The install process is greatly improved from S10, and
we as a community are going to improve it even more. Typical clueless
media with a
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Will there be consideration given to community based operations that are
> not under the OpenSolaris umbrella and thus not inside Sun corporate?
Tim was on the OGB call today talking about the Town Hall, and Glynn
suggested that segment of the meeting could be for variou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_97 including major fixes
> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS).
>
Thanks, guys. Update was perfect (so
On 09/19/08 07:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_98
Update 97->98 went perfectly ...
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
__
hey ... when I was in China last week I could not access many of my
images on flickr with my laptop unless I was behind Sun's firewall.
This, apparently, is well known with flickr in China. But now that I'm
back in Japan I /still/ can't access them. It's almost as if my browser
is stuck and thi
Alfred Peng wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> This seems to be weird. Could you logout flickr and re-login to have a
> try?
Tried it. Didn't work.
> I'd guess one of the following options could solve the problem.
> 1. Create a new profile.
>
Rich Lowe also suggested this, and I tried it and it worked. :)
Ginn Chen wrote:
> Clear everything in "Clear Private Data" dialog, quit Firefox
> completely and restart.
> It should work.
>
Nope. :) Tried it. Didn't work. The only thing that works is creating a
new profile. Thanks for the suggestion, though. I'm learning more about FF.
Jim
--
http:
Nice to see OpenSolaris 2008.05 shipping in the back of new books in
Japan:
http://www.amazon.co.jp/OpenSolaris%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88%E3%82%A2%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E3%83%90%E3%82%A4%E3%83%96%E3%83%AB-%E5%A4%A7%E6%B4%A5-%E7%9C%9F/dp/4839929769/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1224839720&s
Masafumi Ohta wrote:
> Jim were you there at the event?I was late at the event:(
> I've read that,exactly so cool:))
>
Yah, I was just there for a few minutes. Too tired to stay tonight. But
nice to see the room completely full yet again. :)
Jim
___
i
Alfred Peng wrote:
> jimgris wrote:
>> hey ...
>>
>> I noticed that in the default Firefox links for OpenSolaris 2008.11
>> there is an OpenSolaris User Group pointer to the Advocacy Community:
>>
>> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/
>>
>> That's great. Thank you. But in the future, ra
Call details:
http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OpenSolaris_Townhall_Apr_24_2009
On 04/13/09 01:50, Vincent Murphy wrote:
All,
It has been a while since the last Town Hall meeting, and a lot has
gone on since then. We are planning the next Town Hall meeting for
Friday April 24th from 8a
Che Kristo wrote:
the demand might be there if they sold them outide of the US and UK :-|
Especially for those little mini Netbooks. They are quite popular here
in Asia, and since the OpenSolaris community is growing in Asia quite
nicely that could prove interesting some day .
Jim
_
Gilles Gravier wrote:
Hi gang!
Just received a new Tecra M10 (by the way, I can't believe they still
ship them to us with Windows XP).
Did you order it from here?
http://www.shopopensolaris.com/suntoshiba/home.htm
That page says that only the mini NB200 ships with both OpenSolaris and
Wind
Shawn Walker wrote:
pfexec beadm create OpenSolaris_129
pfexec beadm mount OpenSolaris_129 /mnt
pfexec pkg -R /mnt install -v ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.128
See if that updates the new BE with build 128.
Also, please file a bug about this issue at defect.opensolaris.org
under development -> pkg.
h
Shawn Walker wrote:
No. What does "pkg list -av entire" say?
jimg...@jg-opensolaris:~# pkg list -av entire
FMRI
STATE UFOXI
pkg://dev/ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.127:2009T131831Z
installed -
pkg://opensolaris.org/
Shawn Walker wrote:
It looks as though you still have opensolaris.org pointing at '/dev'.
Try:
pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev
opensolaris.org
Ok, got it. I did set-publisher wrong. :) Works now. Updated to 128a
fine. Thanks.
Jim
_
On 08/26/10 09:48, Mike Gerdts wrote:
If there is objection to this proposal, I will be supportive those
wishing to keep it alive and will seek someone to take over my
moderation role.
Mike ... this thread started on indiana-discuss and website-discuss, but
it's no longer on website-discuss
On 08/31/10 12:32, Mike Gerdts wrote:
Web site admins: Please retire indiana-discuss while preserving the archives
Ok, Mike. I'll take care of it. Thanks.
Jim
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris
60 matches
Mail list logo