On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:27 -0600, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> I have spent some time investigating what might be appropriate
> for Slim
> Install, aka OpenSolaris Live CD. My strawman proposal is to
> have the
> following:
>
> 1. A fully fun
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:57 -0600, Keith Bierman wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > I think that its really important that the live cd is a true subset of
> > what a user would get from a full indiana (or solaris next as the
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:27 -0700, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
>
>Instead of 2 livecds there can be one having both environments. The
> user is
>asked which he'd prefer while booting up (among other things). That
> selection
>is utilized also while installing to harddisk.
>
Sounds good bu
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:25 -0600, Keith Bierman wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> >
> > These two will probably converge over time as indiana and Solaris
> > become
> > one (thats the current plan - right?) but it seems to me that THE mo
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:38 +0100, Tim Foster wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:18 +0200, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> > Tim Foster wrote, On 12/09/07 14:59:
> >
> > > * No idea if this is possible with Compiz (Erwann?) but a desktop
> > >background/app with semi-translucent RSS headlines
>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 12:11 +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> Brandorr wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> One issue that probably requires some thought is the general branding
> >> experience
> >> of Indiana from a user point of view - that is, the use
How can I get in-preview.iso to work in xvm?
Thanks,
-Mark
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 12:56 +0100, Mark Phalan wrote:
> How can I get in-preview.iso to work in xvm?
>
Looks like I can't :( Indiana is not currently shipping an xvm kernel.
-Mark
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@open
How can I generate my own indiana iso (identical to the in-preview.iso)?
I'd like to have a look to see what it would take to get it booting
under xvm.
Cheers,
-Mark
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensola
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 11:13 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > How can I generate my own indiana iso (identical to the in-preview.iso)?
> > I'd like to have a look to see what it would take to get it booting
> > under xvm.
> >
>
> hg c
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 12:22 -0500, Sara Dornsife wrote:
> We talked about a flying pig as a potential community mascot at the
> Summit. No graphics have been created.
> Sara
>
Please, not a flying pig!
-Mark
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-d
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:44 -0500, Jeff Victor wrote:
> Can OSDP (Indiana) be installed as a Solaris xVM guest?
>
Not in PV mode yet. I opened this bug to track it:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=78
-Mark
___
indiana-discuss maili
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:35 -0800, Rich Burridge wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > To which I will have to disagree and state that the longer a name is
> > the easier it is to mistype it and the more annoying.
> >
> > There must be a compromise between descriptive and efficient.
> >
> > Small names
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 08:10 -0800, Rich Burridge wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > > $ make
> > > make makekdewidgets
> > > makedepend make-memtest86+-boot-floppy
> > > make_driver_db_cups make_method
>
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 01:23 -0800, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > > On the negative side: > > * no support for ext2/3 partitions ? >
> The main issue here is licensing I believe. The FUSE project will
> hopefully be bringing ext2/ext3 compatibility to our world: >
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/pro
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:18 +, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> > OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> > the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> > >How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
> > etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
> > because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
> > >OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
> >
> > Euan,
> > Multimedia o
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:25 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Mark Phalan wrote:
> >> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> >> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> >> the ffmpeg plugin for
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:17 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:25 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> > Mark Phalan wrote:
> >> >> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> >> >> OpenSolari
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> >>>> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
> >>> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
> &
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 15:24 +0100, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008 15:05:57 Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
>
> > >
> > > "The playback of this movie requires a MPEG-1/2 System Stream
> >
What are the plans for theming Indiana?
Will Indiana use the current SXDE theme (nimbus)? I like the default
gnome theme (currently in DP2) but there is a lack of consistency, for
e.g. the GDM theme (java theme?).
Are there plans for a graphical boot, ala modern linux distros?
Cheers,
-Mark
__
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 06:26 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > What are the plans for theming Indiana?
> > Will Indiana use the current SXDE theme (nimbus)? I like the default
> > gnome theme (currently in DP2) but there is a lack of consis
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 17:24 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 29 Feb 2008, at 11:35, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 06:26 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> Mark Phalan wrote:
> >>> What are the plans for
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:35 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 29 Feb 2008, at 17:56, Mark Phalan wrote:
> >
> > Ok, makes sense. Still if I had to choose between what's currently in
> > Indiana preview 2 and the Sun branding I'd choose the Sun branding. Is
> &
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:16 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> We're starting to document what the default desktop configuration for
> the Indiana 1.0 release should be, and naturally we'd like your
> feedback.
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/uispecs/indiana-uispec/
>
> Right n
On 12 Mar 2008, at 20:28, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>> That has always flabbergasted me as well.
>>
>> Most users are going to be more familiar with Evolution (since it is
>> "like MS Outlook") than Thunderbird.
>>
>> Though I suppose that depends on whether you are talking about
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 15:12 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:09 +0100, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> > Why is thunderbird given higher visibility (by being in the panel) over
> > evolution - the default gnome mail app?
>
> Basically, this is a hangover fro
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 02:16 -0700, Johnny Koen wrote:
> Hi Gurus,
>
> I have just installed Indiana preview 2 and absolutely love it . I have
> one problem though. I cannot ssh from my user in as root. I can "su -"
> but ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not work. ssh asks for the password but
> does
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 02:37 -0700, Johnny Koen wrote:
> But how can I get around installing applications as root and use X
Install applications by 'su'ing to root.
Run X applications (locally) as root by running
$ xhost +si:localuser:root
$ su -
#
-Mark
_
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:53 +0200, Mark Phalan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 02:37 -0700, Johnny Koen wrote:
> > But how can I get around installing applications as root and use X
>
> Install applications by 'su'ing to root.
>
> Run X applications (locally) a
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:01 +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As opensolaris.com starts to focus more on the 'download, install and run'
> experience, catering towards the consumer rather than the producer, a few
> people
> in Sun have been working on a design separate to that of the curre
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:55 -0700, MC wrote:
> While I'm thinking about it, I want to strongly recommend that the
> default user and password be changed to something other than jack and
> jack. It stunningly unprofessional :) There are ample linux livecds
> to use for inspiration if an altern
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 10:23 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Bryan Boone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > Just got back from CommunityOne and JavaOne and I'm chomping at the bit
> > to install OpenSolaris for real on a desktop
> >
> > 1) I installed i
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 17:09 +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
> I've been running I2008.05 successfully for a while now in VirtualBox
> under OS X. I t's working fine most of the time, but the last couple
> of days I've found that the clock seems to reset to Jan 1 1970 for no
> obvious reason. Any
On 1 Jul 2008, at 23:58, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Dennis Clarke
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As a side note, and tangential to this discussion, I have long felt
>>> that we need a md5ha
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 14:53 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> As we all know, the live CD has grown quite a bit since the 2008.05
> release. I've spent some time analyzing how we're using the space and
> where the growth between build 86 and build 94 occurred, and worked up
> some recommendations.
>
>
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 14:15 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2008, at 00:28, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 15:34 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> >> Laca,
> >>
> >> There were two other GNOME packages that I was interested in
> >> understanding if we can reduce:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:19 +0200, Roman Strobl wrote:
> Andras Barna wrote:
> > (/me hates pidgins' keyring thingy)
> >
> +1 - any ideas about how to turn the keyring off? I have filed a bug for
> this:
>
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
You should be careful about thi
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 05:41 -0700, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess subject explains it all.
>
> Instead of having to download screen from Blastwave or SFW why not to include
> it in standard Open Solaris distro?
> --
I think there are people working on it..
see PSARC/2008/413
htt
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:00 +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> Thursday, August 28, 2008, 2:05:19 PM, you wrote:
>
> MP> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 05:41 -0700, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I guess subject explains it all.
> >>
> >> Instead of having to download screen
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 14:19 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 14:53 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> >> As we all know, the live CD has grown quite a bit since the 2008.05
> >> release. I've spent some time analyzing how we'
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 23:51 -0800, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> http://blogs.sun.com/gerhardhofweber/entry/ntfs_mounting_rw_on_opensolaris
>
> I have not tried it yet, but will in the very near future.
>
> The instructions seem to be very thorough. Thanks a whole bunch!
I should warn you that fuse
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:19 -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
> on Thu May 28 2009, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:30 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
>
On 29 May 2009, at 18:29, Haik Aftandilian wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:30 AM, David Abrahams d...@boostpro.com
wrote:
I have already been using it, thanks. It's not that
I prefer sudo; I'm just trying to understand the proper place of
pfexec
in the system. It's a little odd to issue
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:53 -0700, Alan Steinberg wrote:
> I just discovered the SUNWntfsprogs package that is installed on my
> system, and it looks very useful. But... there is a manpage for
> ntfsmount, yet that program is not included. Is that by design?
Yes. It wasn't included as it relies
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 21:30 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > SX-CE snv_121 seems to be working pretty well for me, so I'd expect any
> > time /dev to be upgraded to the same (there is some problem with compiz
> > using Intel graphics - it start
On 10/ 2/09 01:34 PM, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Hi
>>Have you looked in the /contrib repository?
Shouldn't "pkg search -r " look in all configured repositories?
Anyway, I manually checked the /conbrib respository and did not find a
chm reader
I think I remember getting gnochm running without
On 04/ 1/10 08:04 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
OpenSSL Security Advisory [24 March 2010]
"Record of death" vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8m
In TLS connections, certain incorrectly formatted records can cause
an OpenSSL client
On 04/ 2/10 02:07 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
Mark, Thanks for that update. I filed a separate bug for the update
to Apache 2.2.15 which is also affected - since IPS 134 has Apache
2.2.14 and I didn't see the update in SFW yet. This affects the
current Oracle Sun Web Stack as well (currently Apache 2.2.1
50 matches
Mail list logo
