--On 27. Mai 2009 22:42:30 -0400 Gottschalk, David dgot...@emory.edu
wrote:
Well, I tried to enable this same feature this evening in sendmail, but
ran into some problems. Forgive me as I am complete novice when it comes
to enabling this feature in sendmail. I enabled this in my sendmail.cf,
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 27. Mai 2009 22:42:30 -0400 Gottschalk, David
dgot...@emory.edu wrote:
Well, I tried to enable this same feature this evening in sendmail, but
ran into some problems. Forgive me as I am complete novice when it comes
to enabling this feature in sendmail. I
--On 28. Mai 2009 11:39:03 +0200 Garry ga...@glendown.de wrote:
You didn't actually edit the .cf file, did you? That's not how it
works ... you need to edit the .mc and generate the .cf.
He didn't, he put it in the .mc and m4'd it ...
Wouldn't the m4 command have thrown an error in that case
...@emory.edu
-Original Message-
From: Garry Glendown [mailto:ga...@glendown.de]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:18 PM
To: Gottschalk, David
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Gottschalk, David wrote:
I put the lines in my sendmail.mc file then built the sendmail.cf file.
I'm
david.gottsch...@emory.edu
-Original Message-
From: Garry [mailto:ga...@glendown.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:17 AM
To: Gottschalk, David
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Gottschalk, David wrote:
Oh, one thing I forgot to mention.
I got the unknown mailer error
Garry wrote:
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus')dnl
ifdef(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',,
`define(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS', `deliver -e -f $f -m $h -- $u')')
dnl MAILER(`cyrus')dnl
Of course, that was
MAILER(`cyrus')dnl
Also, please note that the define/ifdef part was well above all the
other MAILER
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:21 -0400, Gottschalk, David wrote:
See, I'm using this entirely custom deliver script in .procmailrc, and
I think that is my problem. I think if Sieve doesn't get a proper from
address, it will not reply. The question is how do you know
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
script stuff ... so I added the -D to the lmtpd line, which I
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
script stuff ... so I added
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:35 +0200, Carsten Hoeger wrote:
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but
Carsten Hoeger wrote:
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Garry wrote:
Can someone please clarify what process' job it is to generate the mail
by calling sendmail? Is it lmtpd which I assumed? I really need to stop
wasting time on looking at the wrong places and got to move on to more
important work ...
lmtpd processes sieve
Well, found another post on this ... seems to be that depending on the
way the MTA does the local delivery causes vacation (and only vacation)
to work or not...
Originally, I had this in my .mc file:
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus')dnl
ifdef(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',,
`define(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',
-bounces+dgottsc=emory@lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
Garry
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:45 PM
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Well, found another post on this ... seems to be that depending on the
way the MTA does the local delivery
@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:info-cyrus-bounces+dgottsc=emory@lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
Garry
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:12 PM
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Sieve: Vacation not working
I have a SuSE Enterprise 10 system set up, which is running smoothly ...
I have
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working
Gottschalk, David wrote:
Check out my thread going on this.
I'm having the same issue.
How do you hand off mail from Sendmail to Cyrus? I'm thinking that could be
my issue, maybe yours too.
I'm using the cyrus feature
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:21 -0400, Gottschalk, David wrote:
See, I'm using this entirely custom deliver script in .procmailrc, and
I think that is my problem. I think if Sieve doesn't get a proper from
address, it will not reply. The question is how do you know if this is
occurring?
Sendmail
I have a SuSE Enterprise 10 system set up, which is running smoothly ...
I have Cyrus 2.2.12 on it, which too is working fine - IMAP, SASL-Auth,
the whole 9 yards ... even Sieve itself is fine, messages are moved to
the appropriate folders as directed in the Sieve config ...
Here's an excerpt
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Did you use umlauts or other non 8 bit characters in the vacation text
(that was my problem at the beginning)?
the script itself is really simple:
require vacation;
vacation :days 7 :addresses [ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Out
of
office ...;
no plain
Did you enable the mailto method in imapd.conf? Without this
enabled, all of the functions that send mail are disabled.
--
Jo Rhett
Senior Network Engineer
Network Consonance
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List
Hello Georg
Did you use umlauts or other non 8 bit characters in the vacation text
(that was my problem at the beginning)?
Regards,
Martin
2006/10/24, Georg Glas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi list,
i have a cyrus 2.2.12 installation (debians kolab-cyrus-imapd package
with AutoCreate Inbox patch).
Hi list,
i have a cyrus 2.2.12 installation (debians kolab-cyrus-imapd package
with AutoCreate Inbox patch). It seems that every filter works but the
vacation action is simply ignored.
When email is delivered i see an stat/open syscall for the script, and
the precompiled script seems to be
Hi,
I do have a set of rules, which are all working, and then, I add :
require vacation;
if header :contains subject vacation sieve {
vacation I'm outta here;
fileinto INBOX/mat;
stop;
}
It does file the mail into INBOX/mat but does not respond with anything.
Am I doing something wrong
I believe you need an address option.
The vacation facility will only send out a message if the to address
matches the addresse(s) in the address option. This allows sieve to
prevent messages being sent to mailing lists, spam.
johnh...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Hi,
I do have
I have the following script that I have installed and activated using
sieveshell.
require [vacation,reject];
if address :is From [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
reject Please do not email me anymore.;
} else {
vacation I'm on vacation.;
}
When I send a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get a
reject
I know this has been discussed several times on this list, but I have an
additional wrench to add to the problem:
Sieve works perfectly for all functions except for vacation. We are
using sendmail as the MTA, Cyrus as the IMAP server, and procmail to
process some advanced SPAM filtering.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:10:05PM -0500, Eric Minto wrote:
Sieve works perfectly for all functions except for vacation. We are
using sendmail as the MTA, Cyrus as the IMAP server, and procmail to
process some advanced SPAM filtering. Many would ask: Why not use the
vacation
On Wed 27 Feb 2002 at 00:44:50 -0500, you wrote:
When Cyrus puts the return-path into the message, it qualifies it
with the value of 'servername' (defaulting to gethostname()). It
doesn't pass that qualification to the Sieve subsystem.
Doesn't Cyrus only qualify it if the MAIL FROM in the
--On Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:18 AM -0800 Ian Macdonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 27 Feb 2002 at 00:44:50 -0500, you wrote:
When Cyrus puts the return-path into the message, it qualifies it
with the value of 'servername' (defaulting to gethostname()). It
doesn't pass that
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:11:23 -0800
From: Ian Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lovelace.corp.google.com ([unix socket])
by lovelace.corp.google.com (Cyrus v2.1.2) with LMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2002
+16:00:45 -0800
X-Sieve: CMU
On Fri 22 Feb 2002 at 19:04:17 -0600, you wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:48:35PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following this thread, and
humbly suggest looking for where the line:
unspecified-domain.google.com
is lurking.
What's the Return-Path header indicate?
If Return-Path isn't right, vacation won't work either, since the
vacation message will attempt to go to the Return-Path.
If Return-Path isn't right, then it's almost certainly your MTA
rewriting the return-path to something bogus and there's nothing we
Hi,
I'm running Cyrus 2.1.2/Postfix 1.1.3 here and Sieve is working
nicely, apart from the vacation extension.
Redirects are working, so I know that Postfix is being spawned
correctly to send the message.
When the vacation module tries to send a response, this is what I'm
seeing in my logs:
Ian Macdonald wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Cyrus 2.1.2/Postfix 1.1.3 here and Sieve is working
nicely, apart from the vacation extension.
Redirects are working, so I know that Postfix is being spawned
correctly to send the message.
When the vacation module tries to send a response, this
On Fri 22 Feb 2002 at 15:09:12 -0500, you wrote:
I'm running Cyrus 2.1.2/Postfix 1.1.3 here and Sieve is working
nicely, apart from the vacation extension.
Redirects are working, so I know that Postfix is being spawned
correctly to send the message.
When the vacation module tries
Ian Macdonald wrote:
On Fri 22 Feb 2002 at 15:09:12 -0500, you wrote:
I'm running Cyrus 2.1.2/Postfix 1.1.3 here and Sieve is working
nicely, apart from the vacation extension.
Redirects are working, so I know that Postfix is being spawned
correctly to send the message.
On Fri 22 Feb 2002 at 16:16:00 -0500, you wrote:
Ian Macdonald wrote:
On Fri 22 Feb 2002 at 15:09:12 -0500, you wrote:
I'm running Cyrus 2.1.2/Postfix 1.1.3 here and Sieve is working
nicely, apart from the vacation extension.
Redirects are working, so I know that Postfix
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:18:33 -0800,
Ian Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] (im) writes:
im Well, it's not being sent to the MAIL FROM address either, I'm
im afraid. The MAIL FROM is a fully qualified on-site address that I
im receive mail at, but instead the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im address is used.
I'm
I have been following this thread, and
humbly suggest looking for where the line:
unspecified-domain.google.com
is lurking.
I'm not certain where Postfix gets this, but
when I see wierd stuff of this ilk in my
Sendmail/cyrus config, it is usually some
daft alias in my hosts file.(Legacy)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following this thread, and
humbly suggest looking for where the line:
unspecified-domain.google.com
is lurking.
The unspecified-domain is almost certainly being added by lmtpd/sieve.
I'm not certain where Postfix gets this, but
when I see
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:48:35 -0500,
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] (km) writes:
km The unspecified-domain is almost certainly being added by lmtpd/sieve.
If that's the case, then I bet the .google.com is getting tacked
on by Postfix because it don't care for unqualified addresses.
What a
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:48:35PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following this thread, and
humbly suggest looking for where the line:
unspecified-domain.google.com
is lurking.
The unspecified-domain is almost certainly being added by
42 matches
Mail list logo
