Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-26 Thread Casper
t;>> cyr_expire[96599]: expunged 4907 out of 109443 messages from 143 >>>> mailboxes >>>> master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 >>> It would be great to see a traceback. >> >> Also your imapd.conf. In particular: is delayed

Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
gt;>> cyr_expire [96599]: Expunged 3005 messages from user.myuser.Trash >>> cyr_expire[96599]: expunged 4907 out of 109443 messages from 143 >>> mailboxes >>> master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 >> It would be great to see a traceback.

Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
5 messages from user.myuser.Trash > > cyr_expire[96599]: expunged 4907 out of 109443 messages from 143 > > mailboxes > > master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 > > It would be great to see a traceback. Also your imapd.conf. In particular: is delay

Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread Dominique LALOT
33]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 > > --per > > Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ > Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki > List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html > I got many of that messages after a

Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread David Carter
lboxes > master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 Probably a corrupt cyrus.cache file (at least that's the cause when I see these). Try reconstruct on the mailbox. -- David Carter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University Computing Service,

Re: cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread Wesley Craig
messages from 143 > mailboxes > master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 It would be great to see a traceback. :wes Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

cyr_expire signaled to death by 11

2008-09-25 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
No idea why, comments anyone? A limitation of some sort when expunging a lot of messages? cyr_expire [96599]: Expunged 3005 messages from user.myuser.Trash cyr_expire[96599]: expunged 4907 out of 109443 messages from 143 mailboxes master[833]: process 96599 exited, signaled to death by 11 --per

[SOLVED] Re: master process exited, signaled to death by 11 service pid in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2006-12-16 Thread Nestor A. Diaz
rus/imaplocalhost[19389]: accepted connection Dec 16 15:02:07 pascacio master[19369]: process 19389 exited, signaled to death by 11 Dec 16 15:02:07 pascacio master[19369]: service imaplocalhost pid 19389 in BUSY state: terminated abnormally This are the contests of /tmp/gdb-backtrace.cyrus.imapd

master process exited, signaled to death by 11 service pid in BUSY state: terminated abnormally

2006-12-16 Thread Nestor A. Diaz
cacio cyrus/imaplocalhost[19389]: accepted connection Dec 16 15:02:07 pascacio master[19369]: process 19389 exited, signaled to death by 11 Dec 16 15:02:07 pascacio master[19369]: service imaplocalhost pid 19389 in BUSY state: terminated abnormally This are the contests of /tmp/gdb-backtrace.cy

problem with this message lmtpd signaled to death by 11

2006-11-03 Thread Eric Doutreleau
hi i m using cyrus2.3.6 on a RHEL4 server the mail is delivered from a postfix server via lmtp from time to time i got that kind of message on the postfix side Nov 3 08:32:12 sodome postfix/lmtp[30982]: 021B618D6F6: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED] nt-evry.fr>, orig_to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=molure

Re: mupdate signaled to death by 11

2005-10-31 Thread Patrick Radtke
d my patch *should* fix both problems. On Oct 24, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Ken Murchison wrote: Patrick Radtke wrote: Several times an hour, our mupdate process on the murder master dies. Oct 19 07:12:41 notdog master[2277]: process 15588 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:25:41 not

Re: mupdate signaled to death by 11

2005-10-27 Thread Ken Murchison
dies. Oct 19 07:12:41 notdog master[2277]: process 15588 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:25:41 notdog master[2277]: process 16681 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:32:41 notdog master[2277]: process 17644 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:49:40 notdog master[2277]: pr

Re: mupdate signaled to death by 11

2005-10-26 Thread Patrick Radtke
times an hour, our mupdate process on the murder master dies. Oct 19 07:12:41 notdog master[2277]: process 15588 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:25:41 notdog master[2277]: process 16681 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:32:41 notdog master[2277]: process 17644 exited, sig

Re: mupdate signaled to death by 11

2005-10-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Patrick Radtke wrote: Several times an hour, our mupdate process on the murder master dies. Oct 19 07:12:41 notdog master[2277]: process 15588 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:25:41 notdog master[2277]: process 16681 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:32:41 notdog master

mupdate signaled to death by 11

2005-10-19 Thread Patrick Radtke
Several times an hour, our mupdate process on the murder master dies. Oct 19 07:12:41 notdog master[2277]: process 15588 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:25:41 notdog master[2277]: process 16681 exited, signaled to death by 11 Oct 19 07:32:41 notdog master[2277]: process 17644

Re: signaled to death by 11

2004-06-19 Thread Günter Zimmermann
conf. > Then, you could try starting master with something like strace -f or > whatever is apropriate for your OS. > > Simon > > > >> Error: >> Jun 17 20:12:30 andromeda master[31404]: process 31410 exited, signaled >> to death by 11 >> Jun 17 20:12:30 andromeda

Re: signaled to death by 11

2004-06-18 Thread Patrick Boutilier
Günter Zimmermann wrote: Hi people, The problem is solved. It was because of different versions od berkley-db in sasl and imapd. It found this information in the trace. Another Point is that its only works with berkley-db version 4.1.25. Version 4.2.52 did not work. We use 4.2.52. Had major slowdo

Re: signaled to death by 11

2004-06-18 Thread Günter Zimmermann
> What your database backends configuration? you could provide us a diff > between your 2.2.2beta imapd.conf and the 2.2.5 imapd.conf. > Then, you could try starting master with something like strace -f or > whatever is apropriate for your OS. > > Simon > > > >>

Re: signaled to death by 11

2004-06-17 Thread Simon Matter
andromeda master[31404]: process 31410 exited, signaled > to death by 11 > Jun 17 20:12:30 andromeda master[31404]: service imap pid 31410 in BUSY > state: terminated abnormally > > I compiled with this command: > make clean; > ./configure \ > --prefix=/opt/cyrus-imapd-2.

signaled to death by 11

2004-06-17 Thread Günter Zimmermann
andromeda master[31404]: process 31410 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jun 17 20:12:30 andromeda master[31404]: service imap pid 31410 in BUSY state: terminated abnormally I compiled with this command: make clean; ./configure \ --prefix=/opt/cyrus-imapd-2.2.5 \ --sysconfdir=/etc/cyrus-imapd-2.2.5

Re: Tracking down signaled to death by 11 errors

2004-06-01 Thread Shawn Sivy
I think the problem is related to the cyrus.* files. It seems that a lot of the users having problems and causing the signaled to death by 11 errors have cyrus.*.NEW files. What would cause the .NEW files to remain? A reconstruct seems to fix the problem, but anyone know what may be causing

Re: Tracking down signaled to death by 11 errors

2004-06-01 Thread Shawn Sivy
1185]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process 21886 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jun 1 08:43:26 cyrus master[21185]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process 20660 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jun 1 08:43:43 cyrus master[21185]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process 20133 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jun

Tracking down signaled to death by 11 errors

2004-06-01 Thread Shawn Sivy
After the upgrade to Cyrus IMAP 2.2.5 (SASL 2.1.18), I've been seeing a lot of these errors in the logs: Jun 1 08:42:19 cyrus master[21185]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process 21886 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jun 1 08:43:26 cyrus master[21185]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process

RE: sieveshell: timsieved signaled to death by 11

2003-08-03 Thread Matt Henkel
Okay, I just realized that I ought to come back and post my mistakes here because searching google had been no help to me (and it was simple logic that solved my problem): You have to make sure that the mailboxes for the account have been created. I was trying to login to sieveshell as root, but h

sieveshell: timsieved signaled to death by 11

2003-07-20 Thread Matt Henkel
Well, it looks like enough poking around (and some updating) has fixed the authentication problem. But I am still having issues with launching sieveshell. The problem is that timsieved is "signaled to death by 11". The only references to this error that I could find where in relati

Re: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Jeremy Rumpf wrote: > Actually, I think someone a while ago had come up with a solution. I'm not > sure how proper it is, you can decide. Here's a copy of the post from Fritz > Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [snip] Hmmm, I probably should have looked at it then... but I don't thi

Re: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Jeremy Rumpf
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 08:57 am, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > Jeremy Rumpf wrote: > > This has been on this list in the past, this post is on an > > older release, but is the problem is the same. The imap server > > dumps when a message from Outlook or Outlook Express is copied > > to it. Machine i

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Jeremy Rumpf wrote: > This has been on this list in the past, this post is on an > older release, but is the problem is the same. The imap server > dumps when a message from Outlook or Outlook Express is copied > to it. Machine is an older alpha ev5.6. Here's a recap: [ ... ] Thanks a lot Jeremy

Re: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Jeremy Rumpf
stalling cyrus, by attempting to copy all my local messages to cyrus imapd by dragging them from the local inbox to the imap inbox on cyrus. In doing so, Outlook opens an error box stating, "You message could not be uploaded to the imap server. The server refused to accept it". Th

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > Now I'll dig into tmcomp(atmp, btmp) :-) OK... I solved the problem... It's not OK to do it this way - I know, but it actually helps for the moment... --- mkgmtime.c.orig Wed Mar 26 14:03:34 2003 +++ mkgmtime.c Wed Mar 26 14:04:19 2003 @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ {

Configure: BerkeleyDB 4.1 (Re: Signaled to death by 11)

2003-03-26 Thread Shinichiro HIDA
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Pitzeier wrote: [...] > Hhm! No real answers to my questions for now... I now know how to debug > a cyrus installation but I really need to know how to upgrade from db3.2 > to db4.1 ! Do ./configure --

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-26 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > > Rob Siemborski wrote: > > > > Copying mails between two imap-servers is normally no > > > > problem and works with all my servers, except this one... > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Do you have a protocol trace of what outlook is feeding cyrus? > > > Alternative

Re: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Christian Schulte
Oliver Pitzeier wrote: Hi volks! I thankfull for ANY help! I'm currently debugging a signal 11 problem... I located it in getdatetime (imapd.c) and have to trace it down to the final "killer line" I'm working on an Compaq Alpha DS10... If anyone has similar problems, or if any developer can

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Rob Siemborski wrote: > > Here some stuff I logged via syslog: > > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: tm.tm_mday: 25 > > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: tm.tm_mon: 2 > > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: month: mar > > Mar 25 16:34:30 mail imapd[14859]: year: 103 > > Mar 25 16:34:30 mail imapd[

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
> Rob Siemborski wrote: > > > Copying mails between two imap-servers is normally no problem and > > > works with all my servers, except this one... > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Do you have a protocol trace of what outlook is feeding > > cyrus? Alternatively, do you have a backtrace of the core d

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > Here some stuff I logged via syslog: > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: tm.tm_mday: 25 > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: tm.tm_mon: 2 > Mar 25 16:34:29 mail imapd[14859]: month: mar > Mar 25 16:34:30 mail imapd[14859]: year: 103 > Mar 25 16:34:30

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Rob Siemborski wrote: > > is invoked it dies... You can also said syslog(LOG_ERR, dir) and it > > will also die. So it seems for me, that it has something to do with > > "dir", which is a "register int"... > > This isn't terribly surprising, since syslog is expecting a > const char * as its sec

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Rob Siemborski wrote: > > Copying mails between two imap-servers is normally no problem and > > works with all my servers, except this one... > > > > Any ideas? > > Do you have a protocol trace of what outlook is feeding > cyrus? Alternatively, do you have a backtrace of the core dump? No, I ha

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > is invoked it dies... You can also said syslog(LOG_ERR, dir) and it will also > die. So it seems for me, that it has something to do with "dir", which is a > "register int"... This isn't terribly surprising, since syslog is expecting a const char * as

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > OK. Kick my ass for this now... :-( > > I tried to copy some mails from one imap server to this new one (using Outlook > XP and Outlook Express 6)... This is where the error occurs... > > BUT(!): I tried it now with Evolution; I copied the same mail. I

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: [ ... ] > > I tried to copy some mails from one imap server to this new > > one (using > > Outlook XP and Outlook Express 6)... This is where the > > error occurs... > > It is still a real bug. Cyrus should be resilient to fucked > up input data (as long as y

Re: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > > > I'm currently debugging a signal 11 problem... I located it > > > in getdatetime > > > (imapd.c) and have to trace it down to the final "killer > > > line" I'm working on an Compaq Alpha DS10... > > > > > > Version of cyrus-imapd 2.1.12. > >

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
[ ... ] > > I'm currently debugging a signal 11 problem... I located it > > in getdatetime > > (imapd.c) and have to trace it down to the final "killer > > line" I'm working on an Compaq Alpha DS10... > > > > If anyone has similar problems, or if any developer can help > > me trace it down...

RE: Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
[ ... ] > I'm currently debugging a signal 11 problem... I located it > in getdatetime > (imapd.c) and have to trace it down to the final "killer > line" I'm working on an Compaq Alpha DS10... > > If anyone has similar problems, or if any developer can help > me trace it down I'd be

Signaled to death by 11

2003-03-25 Thread Oliver Pitzeier
Hi volks! I thankfull for ANY help! I'm currently debugging a signal 11 problem... I located it in getdatetime (imapd.c) and have to trace it down to the final "killer line" I'm working on an Compaq Alpha DS10... If anyone has similar problems, or if any developer can help me trace it down..

signaled to death by 11 with newly created mailbox

2003-01-20 Thread Simon Matter
Hi, On a new server, I was hit by a 'signaled to death by 11' problem recently. Logs looked like this: Jan 15 00:11:27 imapd[13435]: open: user xxeid opened INBOX Jan 15 00:11:27 master[1838]: process 13435 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jan 15 00:11:27 imapd[13617]

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread OCNS Consulting
Rob: > DIGEST-MD5 with LDAP won't work with out an LDAP auxprop plugin, since it > needs the plaintext password (or DIGEST secret). (i.e. it won't work with > saslauthd). This is making since - Thanks. I'm assuming that the auxprop plugin method doesn't use PAM and thus the LDAP authentication

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, OCNS Consulting wrote: > > DIGEST-MD5 with LDAP won't work with out an LDAP auxprop plugin, since it > > needs the plaintext password (or DIGEST secret). (i.e. it won't work with > > saslauthd). > > This is making since - Thanks. I'm assuming that the auxprop plugin method >

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, OCNS Consulting wrote: > Okay. Then what plugin is expected to perform LDAP authentication? No plugins supplied by the Cyrus SASL Distribution currently perform LDAP authentication. There is one third-party auxprop plugin that we're looking at including in the distribution

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread OCNS Consulting
Okay. Then what plugin is expected to perform LDAP authentication? RB > Every plugin that supports a client-side SASL negotiation should export > this (which is basically all of the included ones, except for libsasldb). > -Rob

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread OCNS Consulting
Also, have any idea what is causing the following error? unable to get entry point sasl_client_plug_init in /usr/lib/sasl/libsasldb.so: /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so.7: undefined symbol: sasl_client_plug_init RB > Every plugin that supports a client-side SASL negotiation should ex

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, OCNS Consulting wrote: > Interesting. Have any ideas of what SASL V2 library the module > "sasl_client_plug_init" > resides? I look via "nm" and "ar" and found nothing. Every plugin that supports a client-side SASL negotiation should export this (which is basically all o

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-24 Thread OCNS Consulting
Ken: >>Just to insure that Cyrus IMAP >> was not >> experiencing the same bdb issue as SASL V2, I recompiled IMAP 2.1.3 - here >> are the >> "configure script" options selected -> >> >> ./configure \ >> --enable-fulldirhash \ >> --with-sasl=/usr/lib/sasl2 \ >> --wi

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-23 Thread Ken Murchison
OCNS Consulting wrote: > > Ken: > > I finally determined the issue with BerkeleyDB. The SASL configure script > looks for "/usr/include/db3" which is found and contains (as expected) bdb3 > headers. Of course I compile SASL against bdb4 which is specified by > including > the options -> > >

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issues?

2002-03-23 Thread OCNS Consulting
Ken: I finally determined the issue with BerkeleyDB. The SASL configure script looks for "/usr/include/db3" which is found and contains (as expected) bdb3 headers. Of course I compile SASL against bdb4 which is specified by including the options -> --with-bdb-libdir=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-21 Thread OCNS Consulting
u know of a more exact method to obtain the traceback information, please forward. Thanks for your assistance. RB -Original Message- From: Rob Siemborski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:44 AM To: OCNS Consulting Cc: Ken Murchison Subject: RE: Signaled to Death by 1

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-21 Thread OCNS Consulting
_end=0xbfffedec) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:129 (gdb) -Original Message- From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:45 AM To: OCNS Consulting Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue? OCNS Consulting wrot

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-21 Thread Ken Murchison
ink the binaries. Ken > -Original Message- > From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:54 PM > To: OCNS Consulting > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue? > > In your debugger outputs,

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-20 Thread OCNS Consulting
20, 2002 7:54 PM To: OCNS Consulting Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue? In your debugger outputs, both lib/libdb-4.0.so and /usr/lib/libdb.so.3 are being loaded. What is /usr/lib/libdb.so.3? Is this a BDB 3.x library? If so, this is probably your

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-20 Thread Ken Murchison
one. > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdb.so.3 > #0 0x in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x in ?? () > #1 0x08048bf0 in ?? () > #2 0x08048c84 in ?? () > #3 0x08048fd0 in ?? () > #4 0x40102627 in __libc_start_main (main=0x8048ee0, argc=3, > ubp_av=0xb1f4, i

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - bdb issue?

2002-03-20 Thread OCNS Consulting
-Original Message- From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:16 PM To: OCNS Consulting Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again - Are you _sure_ that SASL and IMAP and linked against the same version of BDB? Do a 'ldd /us

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again -

2002-03-20 Thread Ken Murchison
Are you _sure_ that SASL and IMAP and linked against the same version of BDB? Do a 'ldd /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd' and make sure you're not linked against multiple versions of BDB. Was the /etc/sasldb2 file created with the same version? OCNS Consulting wrote: > > Ken: > > Here's the traceback r

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again -

2002-03-20 Thread OCNS Consulting
Ken: Here's the traceback results you requested. Let me know how I can help RB = # gdb -core=core -e /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.1-1) Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-20 Thread Ken Murchison
You need to feed the binary into gdb as well. Try something like: gdb /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd Ken OCNS Consulting wrote: > > Ken: > > As per your request, below is the traceback from a core file generated by > "imapd" > causing the "signaled by death 11" error. > > I look forward to your re

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-20 Thread OCNS Consulting
Ken: As per your request, below is the traceback from a core file generated by "imapd" causing the "signaled by death 11" error. I look forward to your response. RB == # gdb -core=core GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.1-1) C

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
My idea about cyrus getting sig11'ed is because of berkeley DB.

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
log file excerpt (SA > B4): > >Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv imapd[24376]: accepted connection >Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv master[24388]: about to exec /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd >Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv imap[24388]: executed >Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv master[24347]: process 24376 exite

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread OCNS Consulting
24376]: accepted connection Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv master[24388]: about to exec /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv imap[24388]: executed Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv master[24347]: process 24376 exited, signaled to death by 11 As per Ken Murchison's suggestion, I looked for a cor

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-18 Thread David Wright
>>Anything look familiar or obvious? Suggestions? Look familiar, anyway. It looks like the inevitable SASL reentrancy problem. Try rebuilding your LDAP libs --without-sasl and then linking pam_ldap to the new libs.

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-18 Thread David Wright
>>Anything look familiar or obvious? Suggestions? Familiar, anyway. Looks like the old SASL re-entrancy problem to be. Try rebuilding your OpenLDAP libs --without-sasl and linking pam_ldap to them.

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-18 Thread Ken Murchison
sieve, etc...) > > When a NEW session is attempted, authentication appears to work, imapd > is called and then "signaled to death by 11" occurs. Here's a LOG excerpt. > > Mar 18 17:00:07 mailsvr imapd[12741]: accepted connection > Mar 18 17:00:07 mai

Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-18 Thread OCNS Consulting
appears to start correctly along with all supporting protocols (imap, imaps, pop3, pop3s, sieve, etc...) When a NEW session is attempted, authentication appears to work, imapd is called and then "signaled to death by 11" occurs. Here's a LOG excerpt. Mar 18 17:00:07 mail

RE: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-02-13 Thread Vernon A.. Fort
ke my rpm-spec files for sasl and imap, I will be glad to post them or send them directly. Vernon Fort -Original Message- From: Vernon A.. Fort Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Signaled to Death by 11 I had another thought. 1.

RE: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-02-10 Thread Vernon A. Fort
ke my rpm-spec files for sasl and imap, I will be glad to post them or send them directly. Vernon Fort -Original Message- From: Vernon A.. Fort Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Signaled to Death by 11 I had another thought. 1.

Signaled to death by 11, imapd hangs

2002-02-04 Thread Lisa Maira
Hi, We see this problem occasionally on our 2.0.16 servers: Jan 28 22:42:58 mailhub.acsu.buffalo.edu master[3279]: [ID 970914 local6.error] process 294 exited, signaled to death by 11 Jan 28 22:43:01 mailhub.acsu.buffalo.edu quota[1]: [ID 866726 local6.error] DBERROR db3: 2 lockers Jan

RE: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-31 Thread Vernon A.. Fort
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:55 PM To: Vernon A.. Fort; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 Just a shot in the dark, but is Postfix using Berkeley DB for anything? LMTP is shared among both applications and if either needs to access the same DB then one

RE: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-31 Thread Vernon A.. Fort
the problem do to all the posts I see concerning the vm stuff. Any thoughts. Vernon A. Fort -Original Message- From: Michael Fair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:55 PM To: Vernon A.. Fort; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signaled to Death by 11 Just a shot

Re: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-31 Thread Michael Fair
Berkely version? -- Michael -- - Original Message - From: "Vernon A.. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:14 AM Subject: Signaled to Death by 11 > Hello all, > I have a problem for which has consumed me. The mas

Re: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-25 Thread Ramiro Morales
ed to Death by 11": Subject: Signaled to Death by 11 Date sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:14:27 -0600 From: "Vernon A.. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> } Hello all, } I have a problem for wh

Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-25 Thread Vernon A.. Fort
Hello all, I have a problem for which has consumed me. The master process is reporting the following: Jan 25 09:58:33 mail master[8412]: process 18150 exited, signaled to death by 11 What I have done: 1. Re-compiled both cyrus-sasl and cyrus-imap using db3

Re: signaled to death by 11

2001-11-27 Thread Birger Toedtmann
?) * * Nov 15 20:16:26 firewall master[3415]: process 3419 exited, status 0 * Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall master[3422]: about to exec * /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd * Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall service-imapd[3422]: executed * Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall master[3415]: process 3422 exited, signaled to * death by 11

signaled to death by 11

2001-11-27 Thread Fred Kastl
Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall master[3422]: about to exec /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall service-imapd[3422]: executed Nov 15 20:16:29 firewall master[3415]: process 3422 exited, signaled to death by 11 gruß Fred

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-10-02 Thread Simon Loader
Lawrence Greenfield wrote: > >Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:00:22 +0200 >From: Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I just changed > >sprintf >(messageToSend,"%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n",class,instance,user,mailbox,message); > > to > >sprintf (messageToSend,"%s\

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-10-01 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:00:22 +0200 From: Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I just changed sprintf (messageToSend,"%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n",class,instance,user,mailbox,message); to sprintf (messageToSend,"%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n",class,instance,user,mailbox);

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-10-01 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 17:27:58, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > OK, do not worry :-) We learn something each day. I had no sleep, it was > > already dawn so I wrote some sharp words. Thanks for contributing the > > software anyway! > > > Can you post the patch that you made

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-10-01 Thread Jeremy Howard
Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > OK, do not worry :-) We learn something each day. I had no sleep, it was > already dawn so I wrote some sharp words. Thanks for contributing the > software anyway! > Can you post the patch that you made please? Any other suggestions for improving unix_notify? I haven't

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 15:04:59, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Amos Gouaux wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 05:56:08 +0200, > > > Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes: > > > > sj> I spent a few days figuring out why this beast was crashing. And all > > sj> because lots of people sti

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 23:25:37, Amos Gouaux wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 05:56:08 +0200, > > Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes: > > sj> I spent a few days figuring out why this beast was crashing. And all > sj> because lots of people still are unaware of elementary sec

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-09-30 Thread Jeremy Howard
Amos Gouaux wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 05:56:08 +0200, > > Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes: > > sj> I spent a few days figuring out why this beast was crashing. And all > sj> because lots of people still are unaware of elementary secure programing > sj> issues, hence

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-09-30 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 05:56:08 +0200, > Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes: sj> I spent a few days figuring out why this beast was crashing. And all sj> because lots of people still are unaware of elementary secure programing sj> issues, hence they make trivial mistakes su

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story [the end]

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 04:57:14, Gerald Goebel wrote: > > Sorry guys for replying to my own message twice, but I've got more > > exciting news and updated information about the bug. The problem is not big > > header in general, but big 'To:' field (and possibly others). Yes, it > > happens that

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Gerald Goebel
Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 04:02:52, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 23:30:38, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 17:04:34, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > > > > > > > Are you using PAM/LDAP? If so check the recent archives (about 4 weeks

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 04:02:52, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 23:30:38, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 17:04:34, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > > > > > Are you using PAM/LDAP? If so check the recent archives (about 4 weeks ago) > > > > for a very long thread reg

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 23:30:38, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 17:04:34, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > > > Are you using PAM/LDAP? If so check the recent archives (about 4 weeks ago) > > > for a very long thread regarding a memory allocation problem between > > > OpenLDAP and Cyrus. I

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 17:04:34, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > Are you using PAM/LDAP? If so check the recent archives (about 4 weeks ago) > > for a very long thread regarding a memory allocation problem between > > OpenLDAP and Cyrus. I'm not sure what the resolution was in the end... Using > > saslauth

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
On Sat, 2001-09-29 at 13:44:49, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > I experience often lmtpd process segfaulting with signal 11. I tried to > > find a solution in the archivers the list, unfortunately with no luck. > > What's strange is that sometimes it delivers the mail, the other time it > > crashes, s

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-30 Thread Tarjei Huse
> Are you using PAM/LDAP? If so check the recent archives (about 4 weeks ago) > for a very long thread regarding a memory allocation problem between > OpenLDAP and Cyrus. I'm not sure what the resolution was in the end... Using > saslauthd from the new SASL version would almost certainly fix it th

Re: LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-28 Thread Jeremy Howard
> I experience often lmtpd process segfaulting with signal 11. I tried to > find a solution in the archivers the list, unfortunately with no luck. > What's strange is that sometimes it delivers the mail, the other time it > crashes, so deliver returns error 75 (temporary unavailable, try again).

LMTPD signaled to death by 11 - neverending story

2001-09-28 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
Hi, I experience often lmtpd process segfaulting with signal 11. I tried to find a solution in the archivers the list, unfortunately with no luck. What's strange is that sometimes it delivers the mail, the other time it crashes, so deliver returns error 75 (temporary unavailable, try again).

Re: signaled to death by 11 -- solved!?

2001-08-07 Thread GOMBAS Gabor
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:03:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On a related note, different versions of Berkley DB versions > on RH systems were resulting in signal 11 death problems > earlier. A simple "ldd" check on the imapd built, will reveal > these problems. Not neccessarily. If the

  1   2   >