Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-04 Thread lst_hoe01
Zitat von Bill Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Get people using crap like outlook to use pop3, their clients are not good enough for anything else anyway. Well, considering how well calendaring is implemented, along with contact integration, Outlook's far from 'crap', at least in the minds of the

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-03 Thread Simon Matter
Hello, info-cyrus! My users are encountering a rather interesting phenomenon when using Outlook with Cyrus imapd 2.2.12 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4. The majority of these users are using 2003, but a handful use 2000. First of all, when mail is being delievered to their accounts in Postfix,

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-03 Thread Bill Kearney
Get people using crap like outlook to use pop3, their clients are not good enough for anything else anyway. Well, considering how well calendaring is implemented, along with contact integration, Outlook's far from 'crap', at least in the minds of the people happily using it. Just not with

Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Anthony Chavez
Hello, info-cyrus! My users are encountering a rather interesting phenomenon when using Outlook with Cyrus imapd 2.2.12 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4. The majority of these users are using 2003, but a handful use 2000. First of all, when mail is being delievered to their accounts in Postfix, the

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Jorey Bump
Anthony Chavez wrote: Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to Cyrus) or there is an issue with Outlook that prevents the recipient From seeing the message for a variable amount of time---I'd say

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote: Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to Disable IDLE support in Cyrus. Does that fix the issue? This problem trickled in slowly, but have become

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Bill Kearney
I have seen such problems occur when Outlook is left running for long periods of time. Believe it or not, a complete reboot of Windows is often necessary. Simply restarting Outlook is not always sufficient. I'll second that rather grim pronouncement. Outlook's IMAP handling is DEFECTIVE. It

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Anthony Chavez
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:47:52 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote: Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to Disable IDLE support in

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Anthony Chavez
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:43:04 -0500 Jorey Bump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anthony Chavez wrote: Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to Cyrus) or there is an issue with Outlook that prevents the

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:47:52 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote: Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has been received (even though Postfix logs that it

Re: Slow delivery to Outlook 2k/2k3

2006-02-02 Thread Anthony Chavez
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:42:18 -0500 Bill Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have seen such problems occur when Outlook is left running for long periods of time. Believe it or not, a complete reboot of Windows is often necessary. Simply restarting Outlook is not always sufficient. I'll second