Zitat von Bill Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Get people using crap like outlook to use pop3, their clients are not good
enough for anything else anyway.
Well, considering how well calendaring is implemented, along with contact
integration, Outlook's far from 'crap', at least in the minds of the
> Get people using crap like outlook to use pop3, their clients are not good
> enough for anything else anyway.
Well, considering how well calendaring is implemented, along with contact
integration, Outlook's far from 'crap', at least in the minds of the people
happily using it. Just not with IMA
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:55:37 -0500 Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Chavez wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:43:04 -0500 Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> It's easy enough to monitor a mailbox to see if new messages are being
>>> delivered.
>> Okay, besides tcpdump (which
> Hello, info-cyrus!
>
> My users are encountering a rather interesting phenomenon when using
> Outlook with Cyrus imapd 2.2.12 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4. The majority
> of these users are using 2003, but a handful use 2000.
>
> First of all, when mail is being delievered to their accounts in
> Po
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:42:18 -0500 "Bill Kearney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have seen such problems occur when Outlook is left running for long
>> periods of time. Believe it or not, a complete reboot of Windows is
>> often necessary. Simply restarting Outlook is not always sufficient.
>
> I'
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:47:52 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote:
> >> Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has
> >> been received (even though Postfix l
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:43:04 -0500 Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Chavez wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has
>> been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to
>> Cyrus) or there is an issue with Outlook that prevents
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:47:52 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote:
>> Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has
>> been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to
>
> Disable IDLE supp
> I have seen such problems occur when Outlook is left running for long
> periods of time. Believe it or not, a complete reboot of Windows is
> often necessary. Simply restarting Outlook is not always sufficient.
I'll second that rather grim pronouncement. Outlook's IMAP handling is
DEFECTIVE. I
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006, Anthony Chavez wrote:
> Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has
> been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to
Disable IDLE support in Cyrus. Does that fix the issue?
> This problem trickled in slowly, but have become increas
Anthony Chavez wrote:
Nevertheless, either Cyrus still doesn't recognize that the mail has
been received (even though Postfix logs that it has been passed to
Cyrus) or there is an issue with Outlook that prevents the recipient
From seeing the message for a variable amount of time---I'd say about
Hello, info-cyrus!
My users are encountering a rather interesting phenomenon when using
Outlook with Cyrus imapd 2.2.12 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4. The majority
of these users are using 2003, but a handful use 2000.
First of all, when mail is being delievered to their accounts in
Postfix, the mai
12 matches
Mail list logo
