On 18/03/2021 08.10, Roland Hughes wrote:
https://www.logikalsolutions.com/wordpress/information-technology/qlist/
You can also take a big hit if there happens to be 100+ things
referring to this particular value instance when it needs to change.
Think a working/scratch object you load a
On 3/19/21 6:00 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
Il 18/03/21 12:41, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto:
My main grief is that Qt doesn't seem to care about C++.
What was their last contribution to the standard?
Apart from hiring the ex-chair of the WG21 Evolution Working Group?
(Can we stop with the
On 18/3/21 10:41 pm, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
My main grief is that Qt doesn't seem to care about C++.
What was their last contribution to the standard?
I find that to be a bit of a weird comment. Qt needs to work with the
compilers/standard libraries that we the users have now. Why would
Il 18/03/21 12:41, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto:
My main grief is that Qt doesn't seem to care about C++.
What was their last contribution to the standard?
Apart from hiring the ex-chair of the WG21 Evolution Working Group?
(Can we stop with the FUD please?)
My 2 c,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo |
On 3/18/21 6:55 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 00:41, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on?
Forgot to mention. Comcast
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 00:41, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes
> wrote:
> > > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on?
> > >
> > Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes wrote:
> > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on?
> >
> Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of Webkit some time late
> last year. You probably were on the SPAM and phone
On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on?
Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of Webkit some time late
last year. You probably were on the SPAM and phone call list. We all
know just how technical the people pimps put
as these projects really are separate (not just
paid by different companies).
Yours,
Tuukka
From: Interest on behalf of James Maxwell
Date: Sunday, 14. March 2021 at 16.32
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for different
projects
Hi
Yes, such a setup would be is possible for me.
Am Di., 16. März 2021 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Giuseppe D'Angelo <
giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com>:
> Il 15/03/21 16:16, James Maxwell ha scritto:
> > Is there even a difference between the GPL creator and commercial
> > creator? I feared that once I have a
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:16:53PM +0100, James Maxwell wrote:
> If I have a commercial Qt license, can I still develop for projects
> which are going to be released under LGPL where also other people
> don't have a Qt license (of course assuming we only use LGPL Qt and
> nothing of the
Il 15/03/21 16:16, James Maxwell ha scritto:
Is there even a difference between the GPL creator and commercial
creator? I feared that once I have a license, whenever I use any
QtCreator it is commercially licensed.
But using QtCreator is not actually my main concern. If I have a
commercial
That would be the FUD
On 3/16/21 6:00 AM, James Maxwell wrote:
I am afraid of the following: "(ii) use Licensed Software for creation of
any software created with or incorporating Open Source Qt"
what does licensed software mean? If I have Qt commercial, do I always use
Qt under commercial
There is no particular reason. I just don't understand what all of this
means.
Is there even a difference between the GPL creator and commercial creator?
I feared that once I have a license, whenever I use any QtCreator it is
commercially licensed.
But using QtCreator is not actually my main
Il 14/03/21 15:29, James Maxwell ha scritto:
For A I need a commercial license. Am I then still allowed to use
QtCreator under my commercial license to develop a LGPL project for
customer B?
Apart from whether it's allowed or not, is there any particular reason
for going this way rather than
The short answer would be no.
You have to use an OpenSource version for customer B and a commercial
version for A.
This is one of the reasons I keep 5-6 machines in my office. I load one
up for use with a specific client. When a client wants me to use
commercial they have to acquire the
Hi,
I am confused by the requirement of not mixing licenses, see the discussion
in this thread:
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2020-March/034737.html
The situation is as follows: I am an independent software developer. If my
customer A wants to use a commercial license and my
17 matches
Mail list logo
