On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:31:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt via Interest wrote:
> > When your OpenSource project includes the scripts to make a proper
> > Debian or RPM package, you dramatically increase the odds of getting
> > your package into the actual distro repos. Does any distro actually put
>
On 8/10/22 05:00, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Not ever in my career have I used an IBM Mainframe. Doesn't mean it is a
bad machine...;-)
Well you should have because now it pays more than Qt work! I get
roughly 3 calls per week on it and my blue box is way out of date. Just
signed a $120/hr RTR
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, Hamish Moffatt via Interest wrote:
> I have never used an AppImage in 25 years of Debian and Linux experience
> either. It sounds equivalent to downloading a random unsigned .EXE from a web
> site and running it.
It is, with the added complication of mixing things of incompat
On 9/8/22 23:50, Roland Hughes via Interest wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:00, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
Just to correct some biases here, in my opinion as a software publisher
AppImage is still the simplest way for a user to run your app.?
To get Mudlet (a FOSS text games client) all you need to do is go t
Well,
It's certainly not "optimal" and I don't believe it should have a high
priority. It will lead to many horrible hacks for people compiling
32-bit on a 64-bit machine.
Roland
On 8/9/22 10:17, Alexander Dyagilev wrote:
I think that an optimal solution (and a pretty fit for me) would be
f
I think that an optimal solution (and a pretty fit for me) would be for
the linuxdeployqt to just deploy all the necessary files next to the
specified binary.
It's up to a developer what to do next with all the files.
Of course, linuxdeployqt can also support (optionally) any number of
variou
On 8/9/22 05:00, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
Just to correct some biases here, in my opinion as a software publisher
AppImage is still the simplest way for a user to run your app.?
To get Mudlet (a FOSS text games client) all you need to do is go to
https://www.mudlet.org/download, download the .ta
AppImages are a breeze. For both developer and user.
An easy to use Qt-provided tool for that purpose would be fantastic.
On Mo, 2022-08-08 at 18:03 -1200, Vadim Peretokin via Interest wrote:
> Just to correct some biases here, in my opinion as a software publisher
> AppImage is
> still the simp
On 8/9/22 08:03, Vadim Peretokin via Interest wrote:
Just to correct some biases here, in my opinion as a software publisher
AppImage is still the simplest way for a user to run your app.
Yes, it provides a similar experience like macOS app bundles.
What linuxdeployqt definitely must offer is
Just to correct some biases here, in my opinion as a software publisher
AppImage is still the simplest way for a user to run your app.
To get Mudlet (a FOSS text games client) all you need to do is go to
https://www.mudlet.org/download, download the .tar, right-click to
extract it and double-clic
On 8/8/22 16:09, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
Mitch already pointed you to QTBUG-74940. The biggest question
regarding a linuxdeployqt is: what exactly is the deployment format
going to be? There's no standard way of deploying Linux applications.
There are many.
The community contributions create
From: Benjamin TERRIER
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 9:20 AM
To: Qt Interest
Cc: Scott Bloom
Subject: Re: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 18:10, Scott Bloom
mailto:sc...@towel42.com>> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann
mailto:joerg.
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 18:10, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
>
> On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> > Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
> >
> > I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are ve
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann
mailto:joerg.bornem...@qt.io>> wrote:
On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
> Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
>
> I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
> different.
Mitch already pointed
On 8/8/22 05:00, J?rg Bornemann wrote:
The community contributions create AppImage packages. That seems to be
a reasonable choice. Other opinions?
AppImage packages are high risk for malware (yes, it exists on Linux).
When building on Fedora RPM packages have gotten sooo simple. It used to
Am Freitag, 5. August 2022, 18:16:53 CEST schrieb Scott Bloom:
> Unfortunately both of these solutions (runtime dependencies and static
> build) only solve the staticly bound dynamically loaded DLLs
That's not true. A static Qt build also has plugins in form of static
libraries and you'll have t
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
> On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> > Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
> >
> > I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
> > different.
>
> Mitch already pointed you to QTBUG-7494
On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
different.
Mitch already pointed you to QTBUG-74940. The biggest question
regarding a linuxdeployqt is: what exactly i
-boun...@qt-project.org>> on
behalf of Scott Bloom mailto:sc...@towel42.com>>
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:42 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org<mailto:interest@qt-project.org>
mailto:interest@qt-project.org>>
Subject: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
Is there a Qt suppor
ou can do a static build and forget about deployment issues 🙂
Cheers,
Cristian.
From: Interest on behalf of Scott Bloom
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:42 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
Is there a Qt supported li
Nothing official; see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74940.
From: Interest on behalf of Scott Bloom
Date: Friday, 5 August 2022 at 01:44
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
I
: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
> On 4 Aug 2022, at 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
>
> I found the 3rd party version, but the command line args are very different.
>
> Also, is anyone on the Qt
> On 4 Aug 2022, at 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
>
> I found the 3rd party version, but the command line args are very different.
>
> Also, is anyone on the Qt side, create a CMake function for this?
>
> Where inside CMake,
Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
I found the 3rd party version, but the command line args are very different.
Also, is anyone on the Qt side, create a CMake function for this?
Where inside CMake, you could call "DeployQt( )" and it would find all
the depende
24 matches
Mail list logo
