Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Andi, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 10:23:59 PM, you wrote: [...] > I also don't think we should be waiting for new extensions like PDO. It is > impossible to synchronize with every extension out there. PDO sounds like > it'll be something really useful, and when it's ready and useful enough

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Stig S. Bakken wrote: > John has a very good point in that some of the changes that people > are looking to PHP 5 for will be extension specific, releasing an > RC before the extensions are more or less stable doesn't make sense > to me. Also do not forget that PHP 5 currently lacks extensions t

Re: AW: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Jeremy Johnstone
Forgive me for the shameless plug, but since I work for the company who owns the site I couldn't help but throw in you can always post the new articles about PHP5 here: www.devpapers.com Jeremy On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 06:15, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, "Wolfgang Drews" <[E

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Olivier Hill
Edin Kadribasic wrote: This was entirely my fault. Any chance of getting an updated diff? And I promise it will it will not be overlooked this time :) I don't blame anyone, I just though the patch wasn't welcome. If you can wait until next Saturday, I'll do my magic again (not really... maybe mo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Edin Kadribasic
On Wednesday, Nov 12, 2003, at 02:21 Europe/Copenhagen, Olivier Hill wrote: Edin Kadribasic wrote: Some major win32 build issues that need to be dealt with before RC1: 1. php4 -> php5 rename I've submitted different .dsp/.dsw files to fix this problem, and I even posted a diff file to do the sam

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Olivier Hill
Edin Kadribasic wrote: Some major win32 build issues that need to be dealt with before RC1: 1. php4 -> php5 rename I've submitted different .dsp/.dsw files to fix this problem, and I even posted a diff file to do the same job. No one responded and no one commited it. Oliver -- GB/E/IT d+ s+:+ a

Re: AW: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, "Wolfgang Drews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > I agree. I think we need to take care of this. I wouldn't count > > on any one > > company for this (although this is also important). > > How

Re: AW: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, "Wolfgang Drews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > I agree. I think we need to take care of this. I wouldn't count > > on any one > > company for this (although this is also important). > > How

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Edin Kadribasic
On Tuesday, Nov 11, 2003, at 19:05 Europe/Copenhagen, Andi Gutmans wrote: Hey guys, I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the former date. Are there any major (as in "major") issues which

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Shane Caraveo
Derick Rethans wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote: Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John Coggeshall wrote: I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't seem to have any interest in

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Marco Tabini
Sorry to interject, but shouldn't the feature set be frozen before moving to a release candidate? This stage should mean to people that they can start building software on the new system because all the features are fixed and are not going to change, even though the system may still have bugs a

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote: > Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John Coggeshall wrote: > > > > > >>I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I > >>don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't seem to have any > >>interest

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Stig S. Bakken
Yes, but it's not only the engine that would be going into RC, it's the entire distribution. John has a very good point in that some of the changes that people are looking to PHP 5 for will be extension specific, releasing an RC before the extensions are more or less stable doesn't make sense to m

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Shane Caraveo
John Coggeshall wrote: To be honest, I think the answer is somewhere in the middle. Basically, the engine is done. I think the XML extensions and SQLite are pretty mature, I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't s

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Shane Caraveo
Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John Coggeshall wrote: I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't seem to have any interest in really finishing the code he did write from our conversations. I k

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John Coggeshall wrote: > I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I > don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't seem to have any > interest in really finishing the code he did write from our > conversations. I know that Shane is also portin

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] mbstring warning fixes

2003-11-11 Thread Rui Hirokawa
Thank you for sending patch. I applied your first patch to cvs, but, the second change was already applied in cvs. Rui On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:45:35 + Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring.c: In function `php_mb_gpc_encoding_converter': > 4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread John Coggeshall
Oh, and let's not forget Pierre's PIMP extension -- anyone who has seen his code/slides knows that it blows GD out of the water and he's still cleaning things up there too. John On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:03, John Coggeshall wrote: > > To be honest, I think the answer is somewhere in the middle. B

AW: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Wolfgang Drews
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > I agree. I think we need to take care of this. I wouldn't count > on any one > company for this (although this is also important). > How about the people from internals@ who made changes volunteer to write > about their

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread John Coggeshall
> To be honest, I think the answer is somewhere in the middle. Basically, the > engine is done. I think the XML extensions and SQLite are pretty mature, I know Shane was working on some major improvements to simplexml that I don't know if he's finished yet. Sterling didn't seem to have any inter

Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:39 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, Wolfgang Drews wrote: *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hi, > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release > an RC. I > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > former date

AW: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Wolfgang Drews
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hi, > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release > an RC. I > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > former date. > Are there any major (as in "major") issues whic

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Internal Hashtables bug

2003-11-11 Thread Cristiano Duarte
Hi all, I guess I found a bug at "zend_compile.c". IMHO when you want to create an internal hashtable, that will be filled with internal zvals (malloc'ed instead of emalloc'ed), you should pass the "internal zval destructor" to the hashtable initialization function. Currently, "zend_compile.c" use

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
I went over this list today. Some need to be addressed but the majority are not engine problems. I suggest everyone here takes a look at them and tries to solve what they can. I have already planned time to go over the engine ones. Andi At 04:29 PM 11/11/2003 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: Andi,

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:08 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:01:32PM +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:05, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I > > think end of November or mid

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
Andi, According to: http://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&bug_ntype[]=Feature%2FChange+Request&bug_ntype[]=Documentation+problem&bug_ntype[]=PECL+related&bug_ntype[]=PHP-GTK+related&bug_ntype[]=Website+problem&status=Open&search_for=&php_os=&boolean=0&author_email=&bug_age=0&by=&order_by=id&d

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 09:56 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, Georg Richter wrote: > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > former date. thats too fast, or do you mean Nov/Dec. 2004? Why such a hurry? Shouldn't we hav

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Thies C. Arntzen
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:01:32PM +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:05, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I > > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > > fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Stig S. Bakken
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:05, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey guys, > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > former date. > Are there any major (as in "major") issues which in your > opi

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Georg Richter
Hi! > > I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I > think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the > former date. thats too fast, or do you mean Nov/Dec. 2004? Why such a hurry? Shouldn't we have a feature freeze first and try to releas

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: sousk

2003-11-11 Thread Moriyoshi Koizumi
Why didn't you ask me (or someone else who is keen on tne doc translation) first while I've repeatedly tried letting you guys know what to do participate in the activity..? Please drop us a line on an appropriate mailing list before your enrollment. Thanks, Moriyoshi On 2003/11/12, at 4:14, Sos

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: sousk

2003-11-11 Thread Soshi Kido
To translate PEAR docs into Japanese continuously. There are lots of docs to translate, and I hope to help it. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 RC1

2003-11-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey guys, I think the PHP 5 tree has matured a lot and it's time to release an RC. I think end of November or mid-December makes sense. I'd like to aim at the former date. Are there any major (as in "major") issues which in your opinion still need to be dealt with? Thanks, Andi -- PHP Internal

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] mbstring warning fixes

2003-11-11 Thread Joe Orton
4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring.c: In function `php_mb_gpc_encoding_converter': 4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring.c:3729: warning: `ret' might be used uninitialized in this function 4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring.c: In function `php_mb_gpc_encoding_detector': 4.3/ext/mbstring/mbstring.c:3792: warning: `encoding' mig

[PHP-DEV] Re: backport of ibase_errcode()

2003-11-11 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
Alexey Trunyov wrote: Why shouldn't ibase_errcode() function get backported from HEAD to PHP_4 branch? It requires only minor changes, I did that and it works fine for now. I agree that it's a minor change, so backporting it would be trivial. However, the PHP_4 branch is bug fixes only, and in m