Hey
How are we going to deal with Closures in class properties, like:
class PHP
{
public $closure;
public function __construct($callback)
{
$this-closure = $callback;
}
public function closure()
{
echo
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another subject I would like to see now the closures has been brought up
again
is, how about adding type hinting in method/function prototypes:
function call(function $callback)
{
$callback();
}
Good
Someone sent some patch long time ago to make it use PCRE instead..
I have no idea of it either.
--Jani
Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Hey Jani,
You can run but you can't hide ;) I'm assuming this is down to you, since
you moved ereg.
I won't even pretend to understand
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
dmitry Tue Jun 24 06:07:08 2008 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src/ext/standard string.c
Log:
Fixed strtolower/strtoupper to not modify the passed argument
Was this patch required because of an issue introduced in revision
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Was this patch required because of an issue introduced in revision
1.445.2.14.2.69.2.23 of the file (the parameter parsing API update)?
If so, there might be more issues of a similar kind in there as PHPUnit
breaks starting with revision 1.445.2.14.2.69.2.23 of
Hi Greg,
I must be going crazy. Is there an actual problem that needs solving?
Yep, solved yesterday.
You're saying that a user who improperly installs php_openssl.dll (i.e.
does not follow instructions and set up ssleay.dll and libeay.dll) should
magically be able to use phar with
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Greg Beaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be going crazy. Is there an actual problem that needs solving?
You're saying that a user who improperly installs php_openssl.dll (i.e.
does not follow instructions and set up ssleay.dll and libeay.dll) should
Pierre,
I must be going crazy. Is there an actual problem that needs solving?
You're saying that a user who improperly installs php_openssl.dll (i.e.
does not follow instructions and set up ssleay.dll and libeay.dll) should
magically be able to use phar with openssl? Why?
You are not
Hi,
Please top to make easy problems an endless pain please. And stop to
mix every topics you can think about in every single discussions.
Also it would be nice if you get cooler and stop to harass me on every
single reply or commit, get a life, do something, whatever helps but
stop to harass
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was under impression parser multibyte support wasn't yet fixed.
Was it?
Maybe we should decide if this a show stopper or not. From my
understanding we still do not have any example of
Pierre Joye wrote:
You don't have to be a windows pro as long as you can test it on
windows. The main problem now is that we had no maintainer to take
care of the bugs (there is bugs), to valid a release (sources or
binary), etc.
Are you (still) interested? :)
Yes.
I'll report back when I
Hi,
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
In general, building PHP on windows should be as easy as on Unix, not
requiring any special knowledge of the tools, meaning:
1. Get environment with MSVC set up
2. Get external libraries (recommended to put them in same upper-level
dir as php checkout)
3. Run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is used when reading scripts that are in encodings like Shift-JIS
which is very common in Japan. In any case, I have tried to get
involvement from some people I know over there without much success.
I've asked around a bit as well with
On 24.06.2008, at 16:10, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was under impression parser multibyte support wasn't yet fixed.
Was it?
Maybe we should decide if this a show stopper or not. From my
understanding
On 24.06.2008, at 16:21, Stefan Esser wrote:
If PHP 5.3 drops this feature it might close some multibyte security
problems. However this also means that all those
Japanese/Chinese/Korean/Taiwanese/... multibyte scripts will not run
anymore. This forces systems to stay on PHP 5.2 which will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Lukas,
As such the conclusion can only be that investing any time in readding
this feature would be a bad idea. If anyone actually uses this feature
they will have to come out of the woodwork now or when 5.3 is out. At
this point we might
W liście Stefan Esser z dnia wtorek 24 czerwca 2008:
The problem here is that newer Asian systems will use UTF-8 (except
those nations using characters not possible in utf-8) and therefore the
customers of the PHP developers (on this list) will not need that
support.
UTF-8 can express all
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
The user is obviously intentionally creating a DateTime class, and
doesn't care about the internal classname in this script.
The attached patch against PHP_5_3 would fix the issue by eliminating
the check for conflict with CG(class_table) in the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
The user is obviously intentionally creating a DateTime class, and
doesn't care about the internal classname in this script.
The attached patch against PHP_5_3 would fix the
Paweł Stradomski wrote:
W liście Stefan Esser z dnia wtorek 24 czerwca 2008:
The problem here is that newer Asian systems will use UTF-8 (except
those nations using characters not possible in utf-8) and therefore the
customers of the PHP developers (on this list) will not need that
support.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
The user is obviously intentionally creating a DateTime class, and
doesn't care about the internal classname in this script.
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
The user is obviously intentionally creating a DateTime class, and
doesn't care about the internal
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
Some some minor inconsistencies, between Shift-JIS and Unicode.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode#Mapping_to_legacy_character_sets
And I say good riddance! The yen/backslash conflation has given me
plenty a PITA in the past.
--
Edward Z. Yang
On 24.06.2008, at 16:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Gregory Beaver wrote:
The user is obviously intentionally creating a DateTime class,
and
doesn't
I find it interesting that we could quite possibly get just as many clashes
with namespaced code.
Of course it comes down to how well the developer implements there code.
It's almost like namespace is just a method of aliasing long class names.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
Hi!
in my ActiveRecord, table for DepartmentUsers would actually exist ;)
Even worse. All the data is in the Users table, DepartmentUsers is just
a functionality extension. So you'll be operating on wrong data.
I am just looking for consistency. I am expecting get_called_class()
to work
Rob Richards wrote:
Moving this to the windows list.
I'm having problems to post on it. Care to forward?
Make sure you are using the Visual Studio command prompt as it will
setup your env for you (all the paths, etc...).
I am. As I wrote, I can compile wxWidgets and FlameRobin without any
Rob Richards wrote:
Moving this to the windows list.
I'm having problems to post on it via newsgroup interface, and I don't
know how to subscribe to the mailing list, since it is not listed here:
http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Is there a way to contact someone to add it?
Thanks,
--
?php
class A
{
function mA()
{
echo get_class($this);
}
static function mB()
{
echo get_called_class();
}
}
class B extends A
{
function mA()
{
parent::mA();
}
static
Just to chime in on this thread; I like your implementation and (after
reading through all the other comments so far), prefer the lexical
keyword to import variables.
As I've said before, the closure aspect of this is the hardest to gel
into PHP, which deliberately avoids inheriting scopes.
Currently, this will output BA. You can't tell me, that it is consistent.
Sure, it's very inconsistent. Also, when you do 2+3, the result is 5,
and when you do 2*3, result is 6. It's very inconsistent too. Let's
change + to do multiplication, so it'd be consistent. Why on earth
different
?php
class A
{
function mA()
{
$this-nA();
}
static function mB()
{
self::nB();
}
}
class B extends A
{
function mA()
{
parent::mA();
}
static function mB()
{
Hi!
Most people will think, that it will output AB. But currently in PHP
5.2 (I don't have PHP 5.3 to test it) it will output:
Most people will know (if really trying to understand and not trying to
appear as they do not understand simple things in order to advance their
point) that self is
On 24.06.2008, at 18:55, Wez Furlong wrote:
I'm +1 for inclusion of this into the next release of PHP (post 5.3),
and like Andrei, would love there to be a first class callable type
for dynamic invocation of regular functions and methods.
Just a side note about the timing. I know some
Hello,
With such example, using Users:: over parent:: actually makes sense as
your intent is to request something strictly related to Users, and
you're not expecting any inheritance.
Sure, introducing a difference is not a perfect solution, but the
general feeling is that it's the best at hand.
Hi!
No need to argue over and over, I'll produce a patch based on the
(probably) outdated one done by Mike and have it committed if no new
strong feelings against it raises.
I must be missing something in this discussion concept. So it goes
like this: I will make a patch and commit - No,
Hello,
you're the only one disagreeing here, in this thread everybody is in
favor of that change except you, and your arguments are:
1) this difference is bad
2) no problem with functions
For which I've (along with others) already argued that:
1.1) some difference is already felt by regular
Janusz Lewandowski wrote:
?php
class A
{
function mA()
{
$this-nA();
}
static function mB()
{
self::nB();
}
}
class B extends A
{
function mA()
{
parent::mA();
}
Milan Babuskov wrote:
Rob Richards wrote:
Moving this to the windows list.
I'm having problems to post on it via newsgroup interface, and I don't
know how to subscribe to the mailing list, since it is not listed here:
http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Is there a way to contact someone
Ryan Panning wrote:
Milan Babuskov wrote:
Rob Richards wrote:
Moving this to the windows list.
I'm having problems to post on it via newsgroup interface, and I don't
know how to subscribe to the mailing list, since it is not listed here:
http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Is there a
40 matches
Mail list logo
