On Mar 24, 2013 2:25 AM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
> Would it be an idea to put several flavours of php_opcache.dll at
> http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/
>
> These are quite 'old':
> http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/ZendOptimizerPlus/7.0.1-dev/
>
> See the requests for such dll
On 24/03/13 09:26, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 03:01 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> realpath the document root(which is a symlink to the actual release
>> directory) from your index.php/bootstrap file and use that as a base
>> path for making absolute paths everywhere?
>> that way the reques
Rasmus,
- Request 1 starts before the deploy and loads script A, B
- Deploy to a separate directory and the docroot symlink now points to here
- Request 2 starts and loads A, B, C
- Request 1 was a bit slow and gets to load C now
The issues that you raise about introducing atomic versioning in
On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> While build of 5.5 snapshot works perfectly, beta1 ZTS build is broken
>
> In file included from
> /dev/shm/BUILD/php-5.5.0beta1/ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.c:33:0:
> /dev/shm/BUILD/php-5.5.0beta1/build-ztscli/Zend/zend_language_parser.h:331:5:
> error: con
Hi,
2013/3/24 Rasmus Lerdorf :
> On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
>> While build of 5.5 snapshot works perfectly, beta1 ZTS build is broken
>>
>> In file included from
>> /dev/shm/BUILD/php-5.5.0beta1/ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.c:33:0:
>> /dev/shm/BUILD/php-5.5.0beta1/build-ztscli/Zend/zend
Hi Jan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
>
> Pierre Joye in php.internals (Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:31:38 +0100):
> >That would be awesome, our team does that too, with major apps and
> >frameworks. Almost all reports get uploaded f.e. here (and higher
> >d
On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/3/24 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>> On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
>>> While build of 5.5 snapshot works perfectly, beta1 ZTS build is broken
>>>
>>> In file included from
>>> /dev/shm/BUILD/php-5.5.0beta1/ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.c:33:0:
>
Hi!
> It seems that GNU Hurd does implement flock(). I'll talk to Debian
> porter team if they can help with the issue there.
I suspect it does, the question is - how... Everybody has different
struct flock, with same members in different order :( I'll try to add
some configure magic to at least
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2013/3/24 Rasmus Lerdorf :
>>> On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
While build of 5.5 snapshot works perfectly, beta1 ZTS build is broken
In file included from
>>>
On 03/24/2013 09:30 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2013/3/24 Rasmus Lerdorf :
On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> While build of 5.5 snapshot works perfectly, beta1 ZTS bui
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 09:30 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>> On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi,
2013/3/24 Rasmus Lerdorf :
> On 03/22/2013 02:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 03/24/2013 09:30 PM, Laruence wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/3/24 Rasmus
On 03/24/2013 10:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> Right, but if we handle it like we do with TSRMLS_C throughout the code
>> and always set that %parse-param to this new magic macro we make up and
>> have it point to void *compiler_globals for zen
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>> On 03/24/2013 09:30 PM, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 10:35 AM, Fe
On 03/24/2013 10:24 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/24/2013 09:30 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Rasmus Le
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 10:24 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf
wrote:
> On 03/24/2013 09:30
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 03/24/2013 10:24 PM, Laruence wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM,
Yes, it's a good idea ! Opcache + Usercache = perfect match !
Using Memcached is not efficient for storing lot of values (the TCP round
trip cost).
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
We are going to release a new PECL version today or tomorrow,
and, yes, we are going to support hte pecl build for old versions as well.
I'm not sure about php-5.2 and possible new features.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2013 2:25 AM, "Ja
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are going to release a new PECL version today or tomorrow,
oh? okey, after you taged, I will do it. :)
thanks
> and, yes, we are going to support hte pecl build for old versions as well.
> I'm not sure about php-5.2 and possible
20 matches
Mail list logo
