2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
I just noticed that htmlspecialchars_decode doesn't convert entities like
#10 and #13.
I think htmlspecialchars_decode() only decodes
ext/standard/html_tables.h
static const entity_stage3_row stage3_table_be_apos_0[] = {
{0, { {NULL, 0} } }, {0,
Hi,
See https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65142
I've created a man page for phar.
Please have a quick look.
If no disagreement, I plan to commit this file in 5.4
Remi.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Also https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65143
for php-cgi.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jeremy Curcio j.cur...@icloud.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to submit an RFC to add a new function to the PHP language.
The function would be called map(). The purpose of this function would be
to take an existing value within a range and make it to a
Hi,
I want to deal with Bug 44522 which disallows uploads 2G
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522edit=1
Today with PHP cloud solutions, we are running into more situations
where this really hurts.
Before I begin providing a github patch (as I have no php svn access and
I don't think it's
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jeremy Curcio j.cur...@icloud.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to submit an RFC to add a new function to the PHP language.
The function would be called map(). The purpose of this
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
I just noticed that htmlspecialchars_decode doesn't convert entities like
#10 and #13.
I think htmlspecialchars_decode() only decodes
ext/standard/html_tables.h
static
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay, I've sent pull requests
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/368
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/367
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/366
Hi,
I see the strict mode check is now
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your reply, the main reason would be operator overloading rather
than the typecasting example, the typecasting version is more for
consistency. I am also fairly that there might be situations where it would
be useful to set the value of a scalar while preserving the time
On 27 June 2013 11:04, Tom Oram t...@scl.co.uk wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your reply, the main reason would be operator overloading rather
than the typecasting example, the typecasting version is more for
consistency. I am also fairly that there might be situations where it would
be
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jeremy Curcio j.cur...@icloud.com
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to submit an RFC to add a new
On 27/06/13 06:40, Laruence wrote:
thanks for the report, fixed in
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/fa8611c81ee72839cdff3e72b18cc586feb4aa29
thanks
Thank you!
But it seems that it is a regression because I didn't have this bug before.
How can I fix this in my code? Any idea?
Cheers.
2013/6/27 Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jeremy Curcio j.cur...@icloud.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
ivan.ender...@hoa-project.net wrote:
On 27/06/13 06:40, Laruence wrote:
thanks for the report, fixed in
https://github.com/php/php-**src/commit/**fa8611c81ee72839cdff3e72b18cc5*
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote:
2013/6/27 Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.net
wrote:
On
Hi all,
I was browsing bugs and found old feature request that can be fixed easily.
Request #35703 when session_name(123) consist only digits, should warning
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=35703thanks=1
session.name cannot be integer like string, since it will be initialized as
long key hash
Hi Arpad,
2013/6/27 Arpad Ray array...@gmail.com
I see the strict mode check is now implemented in the handlers and not
session.c, presumably to keep ABI, but this means code is duplicated and
the setting only actually works if the handler supports it. It's
unfortunate timing since 5.5 has
Helping with merging patches and pull requests
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
Bug #60560 was fixed in trunk while PHP 5.4 was in its RC phases. The fix
was never merged back to the 5.4 branch, meaning it's only avaailable on
the 5.5 release.
Could we cherry pick it for the 5.4 branch ?
The relevant commit is
-Original Message-
From: tjerk.meest...@gmail.com [mailto:tjerk.meest...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Tjerk Anne Meesters
Sent: 27 June 2013 11:24
To: Sebastian Krebs
Cc: Florin Patan; Jeremy Curcio; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Gauging Interest:RFC to add map() function
On
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Jun, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Sherif,
I would like to have consistent behavior at least within a function.
2013/6/27 Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.com
I thought you wanted to add an extra error for malformed hex,
Hi Anthony,
I really like the idea. But I'd prefer the following syntax:
public function __construct(~HttpKernelInterfaceForClientIp $parent) {
$this-parent = $parent;
}
Reasons:
* A passed object does not have to explicitly implement the interface, but
only implicitly
Hi.
At the moment we can type hint array, classes, interfaces, callable, etc.
As PHP is loosely typed and has type juggling thinking of (or at least
trying to get PHP to enforce) a particular type (string, int, float,
boolean) would be the wrong way to go - too many different behaviours
(block if
Hello,
I'd like to start working on a bug,
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52355 but I'm not sure where to start
investigating exactly.
I've compared the 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 changes and there's nothing that
jumps into my eyes.
Could I get some pointers on how to start working on debugging this
and
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Richard Bradley
richard.brad...@softwire.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tjerk.meest...@gmail.com [mailto:tjerk.meest...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Tjerk Anne Meesters
Sent: 27 June 2013 11:24
To: Sebastian Krebs
Cc: Florin Patan; Jeremy
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start working on a bug,
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52355 but I'm not sure where to start
investigating exactly.
First of all, the effort is much appreciated :)
I've run a small test case
Hi internals,
during my current work I had an idea for shorter array iteration with foreach.
I haven’t seen such a syntax until now, but I think it is easy to understand ;-)
Maybe you know the case where you have to iterate over all values of a 2D (or
more) array:
$count = 0;
foreach ($array
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de wrote:
Hi internals,
during my current work I had an idea for shorter array iteration with
foreach. I haven’t seen such a syntax until now, but I think it is easy to
understand ;-)
Maybe you know the case where you have
I'd thought this would have been `solved` by allowing the list statement in
foreach (
http://nl3.php.net/manual/en/control-structures.foreach.php#control-structures.foreach.list
)
Doesnt that solve your problem already?
Kind regards,
Robin Speekenbrink
2013/6/27 Florin Patan
2013/6/27 Kingsquare.nl - Robin Speekenbrink ro...@kingsquare.nl
I'd thought this would have been `solved` by allowing the list statement in
foreach (
http://nl3.php.net/manual/en/control-structures.foreach.php#control-structures.foreach.list
)
Doesnt that solve your problem already?
2013/6/27 Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de
wrote:
Hi internals,
during my current work I had an idea for shorter array iteration with
foreach. I haven’t seen such a syntax until now, but I think it is easy to
On 27.06.2013 16:10, Christian Stoller wrote:
Hi internals,
during my current work I had an idea for shorter array iteration with
foreach. I haven’t seen such a syntax until now, but I think it is easy to
understand ;-)
Maybe you know the case where you have to iterate over all values
Stas et al,
So, the question of what is the difference between the two errors
remains unanswered. If the whole diff is that one of the errors has word
recoverable in the message, it's not substantial difference at all and
one that does not require new syntax and big change in the language.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Lang l...@b1-systems.de wrote:
On 27.06.2013 16:10, Christian Stoller wrote:
Hi internals,
during my current work I had an idea for shorter array iteration with
foreach. I haven’t seen such a syntax until now, but I think it is easy to
understand ;-)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Stas et al,
So, the question of what is the difference between the two errors
remains unanswered. If the whole diff is that one of the errors has word
recoverable in the message, it's not substantial difference at
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.dewrote:
The new syntax could make it shorter and faster to write... but maybe it's
a bit too confusing?
$count = 0;
foreach ($array as $key = $innerArray as $innerKey = $value) {
$count += $value;
// and do
I agree the use-cases are slightly weak. This is a draft RFC. It's supposed to
help identify
the areas where we can improve it. Help identify use-cases. Help dig it out.
I think Ralph has the right idea:
register_compatible_types($yourType, $myType);
A better name might be (only for
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start working on a bug,
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52355 but I'm not sure where to start
investigating exactly.
I've compared the 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 changes and there's nothing that
jumps into
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Stas et al,
So, the question of what is the difference between the two errors
remains unanswered. If the whole diff is that one of the errors has
Laruence,
I missed one thing here, it should be:
why we need such feature that only a few people need it, and will
also make reset people confused, and most of other language doesn't
have it, and using it will make things a little mess(and low
performance vs pure interface)?
I've proven
wow... why did this just become a measuring contest. Do we need to go
recruit people interested and attach their resume's?
I'll just toss in I am interested in this. Comparing to current methods of
doing this sort of things(because if you're denying it exists in the wild,
lets open up some of
2013/6/27 Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
Stas et al,
So, the question of what is the difference between the two errors
remains unanswered. If the whole diff is that one of the errors has word
recoverable in the message, it's not substantial difference at all and
one that does not
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Laruence,
I missed one thing here, it should be:
why we need such feature that only a few people need it, and will
also make reset people confused, and most of other language doesn't
have it, and using it will
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
ivan.ender...@hoa-project.net wrote:
On 27/06/13 06:40, Laruence wrote:
thanks for the report, fixed in
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Florin
Could you please point out what happened in the past 5 months in PHP
that changed the landscape so drastically as you say? And don't
mention folks reinventing the wheel in OOP because that's not news :)
The
Laruence,
so are you saying, that check every method's signature of a class is
*faster* than just check interface?
Yes, yes I am saying that. And yes, the numbers show that.
Think about it for a second. When you implement an interface, at compile
time the compiler must loop through and check
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Florin Patan florinpa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Florin
Could you please point out what happened in the past 5 months in PHP
that changed the landscape so drastically as you say? And
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:58 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.dewrote:
The new syntax could make it shorter and faster to write... but maybe it's
a bit too confusing?
$count = 0;
foreach ($array as $key = $innerArray as
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Laruence,
so are you saying, that check every method's signature of a class is
*faster* than just check interface?
Yes, yes I am saying that. And yes, the numbers show that.
Think about it for a second. When you
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 10:21 +0200, Ralf Lang wrote:
Hi,
I want to deal with Bug 44522 which disallows uploads 2G
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522edit=1
Great!
Today with PHP cloud solutions, we are running into more situations
where this really hurts.
Yay cloud :-D
(i don't
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Laruence,
so are you saying, that check every method's signature of a class is
*faster* than just check interface?
Yes, yes I am saying that. And
Yay cloud :-D
(i don't see why cloud matters, here though it's more about modern
bandwidth and storage space)
Just did not want to name the product which prompted me to finally go at
it. ;)
Before I begin providing a github patch (as I have no php svn access and
I don't think it's needed)
...
group of people are mostly solved already). The average framework core-dev
(like Symfony or ZF) isn't going to get *much* benefit out of this either
(it can help in some areas, and they will use it, but it's not solving
major problems). The Drupals, Magentos and Fuel CMS's of the world. The
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Laruence,
so are you saying, that check every method's signature of a class is
On 06/27/2013 09:33 AM, Ralf Lang wrote:
Anyway, I have built a version of the patch (using unsigned long instead
of signed long as the original did) against old php 5.3.8 and currently
a test is running with a 4.7 GiB DVD Image. If it works well, I will
submit the patch and attach it to the
Laruence,
previous test script only measure the last all, although that,
interface already won with complex arguments signatures...
here is a fixed one: https://gist.github.com/laruence/5877928
run 3 times:
$ sapi/cli/php /tmp/2.php
Interface in 1.7314801216125 seconds,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Ralph Schindler
ra...@ralphschindler.com wrote:
...
group of people are mostly solved already). The average framework core-dev
(like Symfony or ZF) isn't going to get *much* benefit out of this either
(it can help in some areas, and they will use it, but it's
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 09:52 -0700, Christopher Jones wrote:
Did you review all the previous mail list discussion about the patch?
IIRC there were a bunch of reasons it never got merged.
what we never merged for reasons is large file support. So 32bit
machines can use files 2G. The patches
2013/6/27 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:58 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.dewrote:
The new syntax could make it shorter and faster to write... but maybe it's
a bit too confusing?
$count =
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.dewrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:58 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de
wrote:
The new syntax could make it shorter and faster to write... but maybe
it's
Hi!
I'm assuming that you do know the difference between
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR and E_ERROR. And the difference is not trivial...
Could you please explain what is the non-trivial difference relevant to
this case and how it is relevant? Could you also explain why making
undefined function produce
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Pierre du Plessis
pie...@pcservice.co.zawrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.dewrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:58 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de
Stas,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I'm assuming that you do know the difference between
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR and E_ERROR. And the difference is not trivial...
Could you please explain what is the non-trivial difference relevant to
this
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.netwrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Pierre du Plessis
pie...@pcservice.co.zawrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.dewrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:58 +0200, Nikita Popov
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Pierre du Plessis
pie...@pcservice.co.zawrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.netwrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Pierre du Plessis
pie...@pcservice.co.zawrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Johannes Schlüter
Hi!
No, my point was that you pulled the card those languages don't have
these structural typing thigns. And I showed one reason they don't.
Sorry, it was you who pulled the card of other dynamic languages have
duck typing. I have showed that what other dynamic languages have and
what they
Hi
Just a comment for the patch.
2013/6/27 Ralf Lang l...@b1-systems.de
Does anybody know of intricate reasons why the existing patch
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug_id=44522patch=uploads_larger_than_2g_HEAD_v2revision=latest
could not be included into php 5.5?
It uses long
To be fair, the overall limit is going to be 32 bit anyway (due to the use
of int for string lengths)...
I'm working on a patch to replace all references of string sizes with
size_t, but as you can imagine, it's going to take some time...
Just throwing it out there that a better fix may be
On 06/27/2013 06:13 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
To be fair, the overall limit is going to be 32 bit anyway (due to the use
of int for string lengths)...
For file uploads? Why? We never hold the entire file in a string.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Hi Tjerk,
2013/6/27 Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
The thread started with the assertion that it raises a warning and the
commits first remove the warning and then adds it again later, so isn't the
whole PR a noop? :)
The issue is inconsistent behavior of hex2bin against invalid
Hi Kris,
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
Yeah I tried html_entity_decode already, but it just returned NULL. On
the same input string, htmlspecialchars_decode returned the input string
but with *some* special characters decoded; 10 and 13 (\r\n, I think)
were left in their encoded
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Tjerk,
2013/6/27 Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
The thread started with the assertion that it raises a warning and the
commits first remove the warning and then adds it again later, so isn't the
whole PR a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Kris,
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
Yeah I tried html_entity_decode already, but it just returned NULL. On
the same input string, htmlspecialchars_decode returned the input string
but with *some*
2013/6/28 Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
Adding E_WARNING is better than removing as a result discussion, IMO.
Given the sizeable number of functions that don't raise warnings, should
this behaviour then be extended to those as well, e.g. base64_decode(),
mb_*()?
Of course,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
I just noticed that htmlspecialchars_decode doesn't convert entities
like
#10 and #13.
I
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.netwrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
wrote:
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
I just noticed
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.netwrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Tjerk Anne Meesters datib...@php.netwrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kris Craig
Hey:
Instead of change the uint to long or size_t, Maybe make the
max_file_upload_size 0 means unlimited? like Apached did, ulimited or
= 2Gb
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#limitrequestbody
thanks
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Lang l...@b1-systems.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
Instead of change the uint to long or size_t, Maybe make the
max_file_upload_size 0 means unlimited? like Apached did, ulimited or
= 2Gb
s ,Gb,GB,
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#limitrequestbody
Em 2013-06-28 4:10, Kris Craig escreveu:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
wrote:
2013/6/27 Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
Yeah I tried html_entity_decode already, but it just returned NULL.
On
the same input string, htmlspecialchars_decode returned the input
81 matches
Mail list logo
