On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Leigh wrote:
> On 2 February 2015 at 10:57, Leigh wrote:
> > length (not sure how of
>
> Not sure how often tag lengths aside from 16 are used.
>
According to documentation provided about the OCB mode of AES it says the
following:
Section 3: The scheme
> The
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Leigh wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> A couple of bug reports have highlighted the fact that our
> openssl_encrypt and openssl_decrupt functions have no way of getting
> or setting tags required for authenticated cipher modes (i.e. GCM,
> CCM, OCB (not sure if this is avail
HP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Jason Gerfen
http://www.github.com/jas-
<http://phpdhcpadmin.sourceforge.net>
pierrejoye
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Pierre Joye suggested that I request an account to help maintain the
OpenSSL extension as per our discussion on pull request #267.
--
Jas
Hello, I realize testing and bug fixes are taking place for the latest beta
release, so I apologize in advance if everyone is fairly busy.
I was just checking on the status of pull request #267 (
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/267) addressing bug report #38917 (
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?i
Thanks! It simply implements native support for creating, parsing &
exporting details of SPKAC strings sent from browsers using the HTML5
KeyGen element (even though the element has been around since Netscape 1 or
2).
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Lars Strojny wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
Is it considered spamming the list to check the status of a pull request? I
am going to ask any ways, hope it doesn't offend.
The pull request addresses bug fix/feature request #38917 implementing
native signed public key & challenge support to the OpenSSL extension.
Details can be found @ https:/
Is there a procedure to take regarding removal of a push to the github repo
or do you simply close it. I would like to re-submit a push request against
the 5.5 branch while removing the old push request.
Also can I obtain some information on the current state of new function
extending regarding ac
Hi Internals
I wondering if "apc.slam_defence" and "apc.write_lock" should be turned
on at the same time?
The default for APC v3.1.13 have both settings turned on.
But the documentation says "apc.slam_defence is Deprecated by
apc.write_lock."
http://www.php.net/manual/en/apc.configuration.
Please bear with me as I am going to address a few things that (being new)
I seem to have over looked upon my initial pull request @
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/21.
I have forked and submitted a push request to add native spkac
functionality per a feature request @ https://bugs.php.net/bug
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/24/2012 03:36 AM, Jason Gerfen wrote:
>>
>> I just have a general question regarding patch inclusions. When a
>> patch is submitted is there a formal review and testing of the patch
>> prior to
I just have a general question regarding patch inclusions. When a
patch is submitted is there a formal review and testing of the patch
prior to inclusion? From what I have been following from this list is
that the process is patches get applied to new/existing bug/feature
requests, bug fixes are pr
)
openssl_spki_details(mixed pkey)
Attached is the patch (tested against php-5.3.8 & openssl-1.0.0e) as
well as a cli test case and module test case.
--
Jason
<>
<>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Over the weekend I went ahead and created a patch to implement support
for SPKAC keys for the old/new KEYGEN element within the HTML5 spec.
According to feature requests at bugs.php.net I came accross this
existing request: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=38917
I have filed a patch under this feat
I would submit additions to the math functions already included.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
allenge any spammer to try cracking it!
Love, Hannes
http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php
Looks like somebody forgot the "I want an @php.net email address" in
the list of reasons why they are requesting an account ;)
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
im not even sure wtf a PECL is but i have some errors so i try this
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
on2/dp/templateMethod.html
--
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 7/19/06, Alan Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for adding the namespace patch in :) - oh well I can always dream...
Regards
Alan
+1 dreamer ( and +1 annoying de-lurker voting because he thinks it is
american idol ;)
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals
So, I found myself wondering today why PHP has no built in way to treat cookies
as objects.
Why?
I've already written my own class, but, we should implement this!
$cookie = new Cookie();
if (!isset($cookie->username)) {
$cookie->username = "george";
$cookie->save();
}
^^ is nice, I wa
Hello Hannes,
Nothing is wrong, I presume. Ignorance on my part.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 7:50:47 AM, you wrote:
HM> Hi Jason
>> I've put together a simple test framework and a 18 te
need to add tests to check out the new readable patch.
--
View the tests online:
http://open.izrm.com/~jason/php-readable
--
Download a .tgz - just unpack it and it's ready to go:
http://open.izrm.com/~jason/download/php-readable.tgz
--
Get it with SVN:
svn checkout svn:
not everyone does the same things with PHP that
you do - you apparently haven't run into the need for it.
That's okay, but others have.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe
lease clarify.
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, May 16, 2006, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Andi,
MB> nothing else needs to be fixed. The patch considers a reference as a write
MB> operation as well as anything els
do to help us find this
stuff out?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, May 16, 2006, 5:41:31 PM, you wrote:
AG> Where would readable be enforced? Would it try and prevent getting
AG> references to it? Are there any internal functions/cl
ly be used
where __get(), __set() used to be used - it won't confuse the end
users who do not care about it. (get/set is a lot more complex).
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, May 15, 2006, 2:15:50 PM, you wrote:
ZS> I h
.
How difficult would it be to build this into the PHP engine?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, May 13, 2006, 5:27:34 AM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Etienne,
MB> Friday, May 12, 2006, 2:11:38 PM, you wrote:
>> Hi,
>> my 2c:
.
I'm not talking about adding hundreds of new features, or turning
PHP into the next java. It's about real business cases.
It's not about what YOU WOULD NOT use, it's about what a lot of
people need.
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IonZoft, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
x27;default') would go a long way to accommodate E_STRICT
code.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, April 26, 2006, 6:41:26 PM, you wrote:
RL> Brian Moon wrote:
>> In PHP4, you could do:
>>
>> function test()
>>
Hello Zeev,
I'd be happy to do this. Do you want this placed in a function or
just sample code to post somewhere?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, March 6, 2006, 6:38:34 PM, you wrote:
ZS> A part of the decision was to supply
Hello Andi,
I think the "sexy" syntax is a significant plus, even if associative
arrays were used in the implementation. Is it a complex thing to
implement?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, January 12, 2006, 6:44:59 PM, you
Hello Jared,
JW> PHP is all about using a simple means to an end and getting the job
JW> done. Named parameters makes coding easier, not harder.
Well stated.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin
SOME DEFAULT VALUE;
is_null($needle) && $text = SOME DEFAULT VALUE;
is_null($strip_links) && $text = SOME DEFAULT VALUE;
...
}
In that way, the user doesn't have to remember the default values,
just the offsets.
Best wishes with
s, but this can be dangerous. phpDocumentor, for instance
> uses this code:
>
> if (in_array(substr($ltrimword, 0, 2), array('1.', '0.')))
Perhaps
if (preg_match('/^[10]\./',$ltrimword))
would be both more concise and express your intent better?
Regards,
Hello Mike,
Same at my company.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 4:31:58 AM, you wrote:
MH> Just FYI, the lack of tags on all development projects at my company.
MH> Mike
MH> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:29:42 +0100
MH> Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello
and the benefit of
being able to use "::".
Please take a moment to explain, because I am an avid user, not a
tokenizer :)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, November 28, 2005, 5:25:41 PM, you wrote:
>> So, the question
methodology of adding many features, but
not sacrificing speed, stability, or security.
Thanks.
PS: This whole issue strangely reminds me of
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/01/08/0111228.shtml?tid=152&tid=185
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
he separator, after all
namespace class->method()
looks great in an email, why not in code?
;)
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
I as a userland library author, would appreciate namespaces quite a
bit. Here is an idea:
namespace1..class()
$x = new MyApp..MemberOrder();
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 3:52:35 PM, you wrote:
GB
of one, it
will do a little token-replacing before compiling it...
Is it technically doable?
Thanks guys.
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ch are no longer compatable with PHP5.
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ould have to first be thought of as the class
name, but if that does not exist, php is not then checking to see if
it is actually a defined constant.
My questions was basically is this a performance issue or just an
undesired behavior for some other reason?
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-swea
ions exhibit the same behavior.
Clearly there is an easy work around:
$ php -r 'define("X", "stdClass"); $y = X; $x = new $y; var_dump($x);'
object(stdClass)(0) {
}
But I was wondering if anyone could enlighten me as to why php would
be upset interpreting th
ication" object
which was basically identical to this concept. I seem to recall using
it for configuration kinds of thing (db connections, etc).
I have resorted to caching for similar needs in PHP, I think
$_GLOBAL_SESSION would be welcome addition, perhaps even allowing for
customs session handler
unctions (eval, echo).. that would cause other problems (like a
> disabled "return"), though.
>
> S
I think Zeev's earlier comment about "If their aim is that good, they
deserve to be shot in the foot" applies equally well to "disabled
"return" "
o Ilia could hand the release coordinator
job off to you ;)
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Rasmus,
Thanks. I guess I did not realize that because all of my
application logic is included after I set error_reporting()
Thanks for pointing this out.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 4:32:11 PM, you wrote
-
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 3:09:43 PM, you wrote:
b> --- George Schlossnagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 2005, at 2:50 PM, boots wrote:
>> > --- Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
ct that will
speed up PHP, produce cleaner code, and encourage the adoption of
E_ALL error reporting.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, June 13, 2005, 8:23:17 PM, you wrote:
NB> Rob,
NB> I agree with you entirely. It
problems or annoyances to PHP?
All in all, I think if everyone stops being religious about goto,
and logically evaluates it, we can quickly come to a conclusion.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L
nt to get something like this:
$value = (integer) (isset($myBigArray['SomeKey1']['SomeOtherKey']) ?
$myBigArray['SomeKey1']['SomeOtherKey'] : 0);
where
$value = ifsetor($myBigArray['SomeKey1']['SomeOtherKey'], 0);
is a bit clean
rating to E_ALL | E_STRICT error
reporting.
If there was any way to accommodate this with userland PHP code, I
would have already done it. However it is an engine level function
that has to be added to the core of PHP.
+ALot
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jason
cess it from within the class itself.
>
> Is there a way to reference constants from the same class (or dervived
> class) in a friendlier way?
Hi Markus,
I often use self::SELF_EXPLAINING_CONSTANT_NUMBER_ONE when in context
of a class method itself.
HTH
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.c
Hello,
-1
New implies "new". Use a factory.
Maybe we should add an old construct:
$object = old MyClass();
Just kidding :)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, May 9, 2005, 10:30:56 AM, you wrote:
LP> I would l
ispers "old" into the conversation and runs away
It's not "old", it is an experienced object ;)
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Leonardo Pedretti wrote:
I would like (for code cleanliness purposes) to make 'new' return a reference
to an already created object under certain circumstances without using a
factory, is it possible?
Thanx
"Under certain circumatances" ? ...
If it's only under certain circumstances that you wan
David Mytton wrote:
> //Hi,//
> //
> //I am interested in contributing to PHP now that I have been using it
> for 2 years or so. I was wondering how to get involved. I am not able to
> help with the development of the language itself but I would be
> interested in verifying bugs, writing documentat
Your (long) message would be better asked on the php-general list so
that poor slobs like me can answer it instead of taking up valuable
developers' time.
The short answers to your questions:
- Smarty or something similar can handle "pre-compiling" (google for
"PHP templating")
- If your IDE doesn
...
>> The obvious problem is:
>> What comes after "i"?
ii? iii? iv?
>> How transparent is this naming scheme to the user?
Well if it's a simple Roman Numeral system like what I've just done then
we wouldn't really have an issue (except that it assumes people know
Roman Numerals). Not sure if t
_$?$_$;
Oracle has bound variables, but you can't use a bind variable for a
table or field in the sql statement.
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
Speaking of these matters, how about implementing functions within
interfaces?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, February 17, 2005, 5:46:08 PM, you wrote:
RK> Okay, I'll accept the "no" of course, but I am cur
x = isset($somearray[$foo][$bar]) ? $somearray[$foo][$bar] : 0;
--
ifsetor()'s purpose is simple and clear:
To return a variable value if it exists or a default value if it does
not exist WITHOUT generating any error.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EM
e used. I do not believe that input filtering should be built
into ifsetor.
Thanks.
PS (The name, as long as it's fairly short, is not important to me at
all)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
for it to stay that way and i think
> it wasn't intended by you, the developers, in the first place but turned
> out to work that way afterwards.
> So I really hope it'll change, would make much more sense. What do you
> think?
Try
$_GET['foo'] = 'bar';
funct
r($input);
> of course works absolutly fine.
>
> Somebody just tell me that this isn't exactly expected behaviour and
> it's a minor bug
>
> this is all on 5.0.3 btw.
Hi Gareth,
In addition to the other options people have mentioned, you could also
use the old stan
ariable that
is set to NULL? Is there any way to tell if a variable isset and
is_null without generating an error?
It doesn't seem that this behavior is consistent with the meaning of
isset(), or the errors that are generated when a variable is not set.
Thanks.
--
Best
Hello Rasmus,
It seems that it should be marked as a depreciated feature IN PHP5,
but not excremental in PHP4. This would let everyone know what
the real deal is...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:04:41 PM, you
ts O->bt, but I think it should have been S::bt
$o2 = new O;
$o2->t();
Is this perhaps caused by confusion related to the scope resolution
operator between the static call, and trying to resolve parent::
inheritance?
Regards,
Jason
--
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Run
s = new $class( $this->id );
return $value;
}
}
}
and then running that same print code from above results in:
123 maple street
being generated. Which is the test data that I have for the customer
table associated with the sales_order with primary id of 1. Weird, huh?
--
Jason N Perkins
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
_order = new sales_order;
$sales_order->has_a( customer );
print $sales_order->customer->name;
print $sales_order->customer->name;
the fourth line works, because the customer object was instantiated
during line three (line three still fails to return a value). Is this
an issue wit
>> isset($arr[0]['id']) used to return false if $arr[0] is undefined, but
>> with the new VM it throws a warning.
Doesn't sound right to me either...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SG> I'd call it bugish, since p
ginal author intended to do,
since the current code doesn't do anything unless you add your own -D
compile definition or change the code to work.
This patch could probably also be applied to the 4.3 and 5.1 trees without
modification, I haven't tried.
Jason
begin 666 mssql-uniqueid-pat
all for it if we have an option added to the function syntax
such as nullable, but otherwise, it's usefulness is minimized.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Andi,
reset_exception_handler()
:)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 5:40:34 PM, you wrote:
AG> I see Marcus has already attempted to fix this even though the bug report
AG> is still open.
AG> Marcus, wha
lluded to, it is a *public*
contract by its very definition.
Cheers,
Jason
--- End Message ---
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
Ergh. I also hope that it can easily be restored to work the way
it did, even if that was undocumented. The thought of looking
through ~ 5,000 php scripts before our upgrade is a bit overwhelming
:)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
erver context (httpd.conf) and per-directory context
(.htaccess) and can even generate query-string parts on result. The
rewritten result can lead to internal sub-processing, external request
redirection or even to an internal proxy throughput."
Check it out.
--
Best regar
Hello Marcus,
Ok, Ok. I admit it.
I made the POINT of reading the CLI manual page before posting this,
but I just missed it.
Sorry for the trouble, and, thanks for the help.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 5
7;CLI') or something like that to the language to
facilitate this?
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IonZoft, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
s, Michael
Please see: http://www.php.net/zend-engine-2.php
This will explain all the new OOP features in PHP5
Regards,
Jason
Hello Antony,
Maybe this was assumed, but wouldn't this be a per-request flag,
rather than a global flag?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:18:29 AM, you wrote:
AD> Sounds nice: we should not call destructo
ack a couple
times, it can really mess with things, creating a much more complex
scenario to deal with.
As I said, over the years I've done both, and this is what I've
settled on as the most practical.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mond
r other comment on this.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:29:53 AM, you wrote:
HF> Hi All,
HF> Have a situation where I want to unserialize a string received from an
HF> untrusted source over HTTP (a Javascript c
Hello Stuart,
Patch didn't come through...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:50:30 PM, you wrote:
SD> Hi All,
SD> This is my first attempt at submitting a patch so please be gentle :).
SD> The featur
Hello Zeev,
Makes sense to me.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, August 27, 2004, 3:26:25 AM, you wrote:
ZS> I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
ZS> simple 'experimental' status and
Thanks for the feedback.
A way to somehow limit the caching of expressions
would be ideal, otherwise, the memory is lost forever
with no way to reclaim it. I imagine a limited size
cache which keeps only the most used expressions would
be ideal.
If anyone can tell me which source file has the
g.php?id=28513
This leaks 50MB per second on my PHP5.0.0,5.0.1. It
is probably the similar bug reported in PHP4. If you
have any suggestions, please let me know!
Sincere regards,
Jason.
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Ya
tion.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DC> bool SetCookie( string $name, [string $value], [array $options])
DC> The $options array is an associative array which can contain
DC> any combination of the following elements:
DC> Max
Hello Dan,
The answer that you are looking for can be found on the Zend site:
http://www.zend.com/php5/articles/engine2-php5-changes.php#Heading13
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, August 13, 2004, 6:59:44 PM, you wrote:
DO> Hello.
division problem with
remainders.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 9:02:04 PM, you wrote:
MB> Found some weird behavior in the built in mod function (%):
MB> $a = 4;
MB> $b = 3;
MB> print ( $a % $b ); (r
Hello Marcus,
Can abstract methods be protected?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 1:32:05 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Ferdinand,
MB> Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:01:42 PM, you wrote:
>> Trying to write a singlet
-
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
onths to a date?
how do you get the day of week for a given date? These are the
types of functions that I am thinking of.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, August 2, 2004, 10:40:45 PM, you wrote:
GS> On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:36 PM, Jason
Hello Wez,
I must be missing something... I went to the link and couldn't find
any documentation. I downloaded it and all the .tgz contained were a
couple of .php scripts?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, August 2, 2004, 10:41:09 PM
3. If there is no good reason for not adding this set of functions
to the PHP core, what would be the method of designing an acceptable
set of functions?
PHP is a feature packed language, but it's strange that this does not
exist in the core. Thanks for your time.
--
Best re
ofessional" functionality as well.
Thanks for answering my question.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, July 30, 2004, 9:24:13 PM, you wrote:
AG> At 09:19 PM 7/30/2004 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 21:16, Jason
Hello Andi,
Sorry for being unclear on this, but what is the exact definition of
an "execution block" in this context?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, July 30, 2004, 9:08:09 PM, you wrote:
AG> Hi Jason,
AG>
gies to the very large and less experienced group of php
users out there.
Hey, I got a good idea... Let's just implement it and not put it in
the manual. Then only the "privileged internals list members" will
know about it!:) Just kidding.
~Jason
--
PHP Internals - PHP Run
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
