> Dear Internals,
>
> I would like to discuss a small RFC for reserving more types in PHP 7:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_more_types_in_php_7
Welp, thanks for breaking my framework, everyone.
It just *had* to be case-insensitive too, hm?
- Nate
On Sunday, April 26, 2015, Levi Morrison mailto:le...@php.net)>
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Nate Abele (javascript:;)> wrote:
> >> Dear Internals,
> >>
> >> I would like to discuss a small RFC for reserving more types in
Hi, PHP friends.
Following on from Larry’s comments, here’s a thing I wrote one time:
https://gist.github.com/nateabele/8d156730dc428322fca5
Someone proposed adding the Contributor Covenant to one of my OS projects. I
read it, and some of the language made me a little uncomfortable, so I wr
Hi Rowan,
I don’t presume to speak for Paul, but I don’t think the point is that any
particular person involved in this discussion is presumed to have a political
intent, rather that CoCs themselves (the Contributor Covenant in particular),
and the people typically agitating for them, come fr
> The point is that, for instance, PHP 5.3 was not a trivial upgrade for coders
> or hosters. Sure it's mostly compatible, and you certainly can write code
> that works from 5.0->5.3 just fine, and if not then you're probably doing
> something wrong... but that's most of the PHP code out there
> > At 17:51 13/09/2010, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:28:47 +0100, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >>
> >>> At 16:39 13/09/2010, Pierre Joye wrote:
> You are not serioulsy suggesting to use phpdoc for runtime annotation
> support? Are you?
> >>>
> >>> I actually am (either that
Yet another user, also with a reasonably significant project currently
using namespaces:
Issue A: #3
Issue B: +1 for Greg's suggestion
Again, just a user, please feel free to disregard.
- Nate
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/u
On 06.11.2008, at 18:46, Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
> NOTE: Continuing from thread "Call it: allow reserved words in a
> class or not?":
[snip]
>
> We can test such automated porting scripts on samples collected from
> PEAR, Google Code and projects like Drupal, Joomla etc. to reduce
> side effec
On Nov 7, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
On Nov 6, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nate Abele wrote:
I was shocked and horrified that that ridiculous "remove-the-$"
post actually turned into a legitimate discussion. I mean,
seriously?
No, not seriously.
[snip]
The trick is know
into a corner concerning future decisions) by allowing a
closure defined in class X to follow the same rules as any other
method also defined in X.
Any thoughts or feedback would be very much appreciated. :-)
Thanks for your time and consideration,
- Nate Abele
Lead Developer, CakePHP
I don't really consider myself worthy to preach to the Powers That Be,
but this is an issue about which I happen to feel strongly, and y'all
asked for some user-land opinions, so here goes. To further clarify
(and disclaim), I have never spoken up on this list before, I haven't
until recen
11 matches
Mail list logo
