the AM/FM doubles that...and that is just for the
DMZ Cloud connecting the GKs and PKs...the PKs
have their own transport and addressing...
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Dan Lanciani'
Do you have any working code ?
Also, have you considered moving your mailing list to an IPv6 transport ?
...would there be any users ?
- Original Message -
From: "Margaret Wasserman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:01 AM
Subject: My Thoughts
a guaranteed spoofing box in effect.
===
NAT is part of the collection of techniques that build on the existing IPv4 header.
That collection is called IPv8...
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTE
From: "Eliot Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...what is the benefit of going forward at all with IP version 6..." ???
=
IPv6 is a never-ending research project that keeps people busy while real protocol
work is done elsewhere.
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.inf
the IPv16 transport.
Applications know why they are using either transport, and can of course use both or
start with one and fall
back to the other, etc. The users are behind the GK (NAT) appliances and of course
have no access to the
IPv16 transport, unless it is via a PK.
Jim Fleming
http
GG..
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
IPv8
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
IPv16
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
1AAA[32-bits][Port]
A...A=ASN=32769...65535
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
= ...
FFF.. = GGG..
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
IPv8
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
IPv16
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
1AAAAAAAAAAA[32-bits][Port]
A...A=ASN=32769...65535
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
- O
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8595
"the various states bills all require the banning the use of any technology
that conceals "the existence or place of origin or destination of any communication."
=
IETF IPng Working G
e mode, there is no tunnel mode. Not only
that, the data rides
inside of the IPv6 basic header in the unused bloated address bits. The 320-bit header
is the packet,
the only packet, for many services.
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
IPv8
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
IPv16
0GGG[32-bits][Port]
1AAA[32-bits][Port]
A...A=ASN=32769...65535
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
wo years ago for fast networks
will never be used - meaning $50 billion will
have been spent for nothing."
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.go
oom to store extra information. As an
example, software can look at 2002 addresses and prefer those over 2001 addresses.
Next year, the software may prefer 2003, and deprecate 2001 and 2002.
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.ican.org/what's_ne
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Geoff Huston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EM
- Original Message -
From: "Bound, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I recall many of us having concerns to review it. You included.
> /jim
>
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame78.html
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you thi
hink people are stupid ?...and will jump off the I* society cliff when told
to jump...?
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
-
Pv6 are not the same thing
...as for encouraging usage of the Next Generation Internet, one way is to
make sure that address space is readily available, fairly allocated, and low-cost or
free.
The I* society does not seem to approach things from that point of view.
Therefore, people are routi
From: "Robert Elz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now however, we know how much benefit there is to claim lots of address
> space as early as possible, and then to dig in
Is that like claiming TLDs ?and not giving them up ?
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer
et, but that would be good to avoid, because that is viewed as
a black-hole, with no hope.
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "GA List Monitoring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: [Admin] Warning (was: Re: [ga] 0
Has the ICANN Board and staff approved this ?
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &qu
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Nordmark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I meant to say
> I'm having a hard time parsing this regular expression :-)
>
http://www.rebol.com/
C@t will be back...
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.iana.org/as
"toy", legacy IPv4 Internet.
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv8/Papers/VirtualVault/
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:
but
people do not care. The IPv4 header checksum just covers the IPv4 header.
Using an IPv4 Routing Header to tow the bloated IPv6 Headers around can
get you a checksum.
Do you use a 2002 prefix ?
Jim Fleming
http://www.RepliGate.net
http://www.Lame-D.com
http://www.d
any source address in the packets sent by their subscribers.
>
where...Internet =??? "toy, legacy, IPv4 Internet"
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv8/Papers/
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
-
the
technology they write about. Take a survey of your ICANN and ISOC
leaders. Most of them have never gotten near an IPv6 system. Many of
them rarely even use IPv4 systems. They also do not appear to respond
to your "requests" for &q
he links are working. If one link fails, then
all of the traffic has to go to the other link. If that link fails, they are
out
of luck. RIFRAF could be easily extended to 3, 4, or more links, with
the traffic distributed 33%, 25%, etc. Since the current implementation
does a 50/50 coin toss, and selects
arGate, which is the Exclusive OR of the
SRC and DST StarGates. Each end knows their StarGate
so they can derive the other end's StarGate from the value
carried in the field that may look like "noise".
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
stored. When
one knows the location of the node, and a node where they
came from, they can compute where they are going.
http://www.dot-biz.com/RepliGate/
Jim Fleming
http://www.RepliGate.net
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Bound" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
the U.S. and parts of Canada, people are developing standards in the
marketplace, with rough consensus and working code.
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home P
es how the other bits
in the packets are processed. The 20 bits and 16 bytes used by VPC
are in another dimension from the user's information. That dimension is
best left out of the view of the users, just like the EOF bits.
http://www.dot-biz.com/INFO/Papers/VPC
In summary, forget about the 20 bit f
- Original Message -
From: )>
To: "June Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-4.3 IPv6 bug - Further information.
> > On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:57:00 +,
> > "June Carey" <[EMAIL PROT
er in the front (where it belongs), and use all of
the bits in that 20 byte data structure and call it a day. Why would
carriers change those 60 bytes ?
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - UNIR and COM worlds @ http://www.activeworlds.com
vPC + C+@ + IPv8 + 2,048 TLDs...this network solution is sim
. It is a natural evolution.
The control freaks of course do not like people having knowledge and
the ability to do their own packaging and administration. They have built
their careers making resources scarce and telling people what is "right".
Jim
he user's usage, are
viewed as OK, while NAT is the poster child for all things bad ? Why is it
that the IETF (and ICANN) are able to be so selective (and inaccurate) in
choosing what they view as breaking the net ?...yet, run around claiming
that
they know what is right
code should be easy to fix up to make
something more useful.
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
network then works to process
what the originating node sets the values to, and the result is observed.
Some people may or may not change the way they set the values,
based on the observed results.
In summary, people will route around the damage and gravitate
to s
evel-Marketing (MLM) sales team ?
http://aso.icann.org/meetings/ac/ac-20012105.html
attendees from 16 countries were present, 55 emerging clients, 5 guests
(Andrew McLaughlin, John Crain, Axel Pawlik, Ray Plzak, Andrea Caro).
The agend was as follows:
a. IPv6 Tutorial
That can be 3 8-bit voice samples,
which is not a bad sample rate, and key-strokes and telnet chat can ride
in the gaps.
The code should only take a few hours to test
http://www.dot-biz.com/INFO/Papers/VPC/
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
-
t ?
http://www.icann.org/general/iana-contract-09feb00.htm
Contract Between ICANN and the United States Government for Performance of
the IANA Function
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
IETF IPng Working G
This all sounds very abstract, is there any working code ?
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http://www.IPv8.info
- Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Conta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
e heard someone say that
"they could not imagine why someone would want more
than one window on a computer screen", the person
doing the demo quickly responded"cross ventilation?"
Sometimesit helps to look at a bigger picture to see
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000
data carried directly in the IPv6 header.
While 16 bytes be small for protocols involving huge files,
streaming protocols and other object-oriented applications
may find that 16 bytes is a nice size, and they could use
the IPv6 header more efficiently.
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB
http
xchanges
5 - 0101 Audio - Telephone Quality
Individual Microphone
6 - 0110 Audio - CD Quality Stereo
Room Speakerphone
5 - 0101 Audio - Telephone Quality
Center Speaker
6 - 0110 Audio - CD Quality Stereo
Surround Speakers
See also Dr. Dobb's Jo
- Original Message -
From: "James Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> But this is perhaps the topic for another
> thread and maybe another working group...
>
Probably a topic for a different Galaxy and StarGate :-)
Jim Fleming
http://www.I
IPv4 Transport.
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Margaret Wasserman'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
It looks like some people are going with BETAMAX
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
> >Mammoth IPv6 Lab Planned
> >By Isaac Hillson, CommWeb.com
> >Dec 4, 2001 (8:18 AM)
> >URL: http://www.commweb.com/article/COM20011204S0001
> >
>
27;d only make the same declaration for the source
> and destination address...
>
It does not matter because the entire header gets absorbed
at the first GateKeeper[IPv4][IPv6] ---> [IPv4][IPv8]
...the IPv6 Header is just an extension to IPv4and it has
mostly redundant information..
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I concur. The flow label should be set by the source host and remain
> immutable as it travels over the network.
>
Just like the TOS field in IPv4 ?
Jim Fle
tions. That forms another network which tends to be very stable and
something people are not connected directly to and which most people do
not touch. That is the high-ground called IPv16. Good luck in the swamp.
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
http:/
epliGate/VPC/
C@t started in 1982people "borrowed it" and called it J-something...
I think we need to let the C@ts loose
Jim Fleming
http://www.ddj.com/articles/search/search.cgi?q=fleming
Oct93: The C+@ Programming Language
Those
are 16-bit wide pipes where each byte has a stream number.
It was the cover story in Dr. Dobb's Journal, #88, February 1984
for those that reference prior art.
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
Jim F
Just a reminder, people claim that 80% of all IP-based equipment
is never connected directly to "THE Internet"whatever THE is...
Jim Fleming
http://www.RepliGate.net
- Original Message -
From: "Francis Dupont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael
Beginners may also want to keep up with the current specs for
IPv6 used in infiniBAND. Only the essential elements are used.
http://www.infinibandta.org
- Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Margaret Wasserman" <[EMAIL
...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Fleming" &l
rly Experimentation Allocations ?
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
or
The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
Jim Fleming
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
--
f the ip6.arpa (nibble) domain has
> already been delegated.
>
> So, while I still don't think the migration overhead is minimal, it
> seems to me that all I have to do now is to implement new resolver
> code, deploy it, and start operation with ip6.arpa. If the migration
&g
the ATM cell size, with the 20 byte headers,
and the ability to put 2 headers inside of a 48-byte ATM payload, and still have
room for some data.
Jim Fleming
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
---
This may help...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- Original Message -
From: "Damien Mascré" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "
considered engineering progress for the commercial
sector which builds networks that real people use in everyday life, especially
in the United States of America.
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL P
For people interested in building on IPv4...this may help...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
-
Perhaps Theodore Geisel, Dr. Seuss' inventor, had the best advice,
albeit not from The C@t in the Hat:
"You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any
direction you choose."
- Dr. Seuss
Jim Fleming
http://www.ddj.com/articles/search/searc
f room for expansion.
The "alt protocol" people appear to be determined to fragment the
Internet.
It is unclear why ICANN and the IETF do not declare that
there is "one true protocol" along with their "one true root".
Maybe that would lead to the declaration that there
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial
C@t-32-BitOID:UnirVerse0GGGWWWX32-Bit Managed Address
Jim Fleming
http://www.ddj.com/articles/search/search.cgi?q=fleming
Oct93: The C+@ Programming Language
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Hinden" <[EMAIL P
Unless someone has an iptables module that mangles the TTL count
in a "non-standard" manner...
This may help...
http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
http://netfilter.samba.org
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16
Don't forget to include the IAB/IETF Architecture diagram, it helps people navigate.
http://unfix.org/projects/ipv6/IPv6andIPv4.gif
Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16One Better !!
- Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
arly
supporting addressing long haul transit providers or exchange providers.
...
This solution is not really acceptable. Or you have some other idea?
The "toy" IPv4 Internet is a sewer.
IPv8 is designed to be a swamp to cover the sewer.
IPv16 is the "high-ground"....
...here
://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12574.html
RFC-2001-07-01-000 IPv8 Expansion of Proof of Concept TLD Development
When one talks about "production services", I assume they are at a minimum
talking about IPv16-Compliant equipment. (i.e. Carrier-Grade, NEBS,
24"
ot; using 2002:: style addressing ?
Has the ICANN Board approved these alternative root servers ?
Are there native IPv6 .COM servers?
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12524.html
RFC-2001-06-27-001 - Obtaining IPv8 Address Allocations
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images
onmany people now know about IPv4 dotted quads...
...therefore...they can easily learn...
2002:10.9.8.7:::10.1.2.3:
...the 10s sort of jump out as "local" addresses
the hex s indicate "legacy" and the 2002 follows 2001 a space oddysey...
Jim Flem
A6 and IPv6 seem to fit together.
IPv8 and IPv16 only use .
Maybe the ICANN Board needs to "take this offline" ?
...in my opinion, ICANN can take all of IPv6 offline...
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/addres
When you say "politically shutdown", do you mean censored ?
Where were you shutdown ?
Has this list been shutdown ?
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/
r examples may be...
FEED:10.x.x.x:
CAFE:10.x.x.x:
BABE:10.x.x.x:
BEEF:10.x.x.x:0000
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/uni
domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
6:224 AU (AUSTRALIA)
Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-NZ.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microso
We "discovered" a whole bunch of interesting IPv16-compliant
domain names at http://www.New.Net
:-)
Jim Fleming
http://www.Arizona.Chat
http://www.DOT-Arizona.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/h
What is "real v6 deployment" ?
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6
Records in DNS
2002:::
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
0 by idealab!, a leading Internet incubator. Since that time,
New.net has developed proprietary technology that allows its domain-naming
system to exist alongside the traditional naming systems currently in use on
the Internet.
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gi
- Original Message -
From: "David R. Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> My understanding is that IPv6 uses the same routing technology as IPv4
IPv4 and IPv6 do not do "routing" they do "forwarding"...
...some people know the difference...
Jim
I thought the main reason for IPv6 was so that people could write RFCs
and get paid to travel all around the world, imposing their complexity on
others...
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http
IN-ADDR.ARPA.
Using the right-most 64-bits for a managed persistent address, routes around
the IPv6 "Privacy Problem".
http://www.internetwk.com/columns/frezz100499.htm
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http:
I believe that the free world and free markets will decide these matters.
Fortunately, parts of planet Earth are still a democracy with capitalism.
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com
What patent and/or intellectual property rights
will ICANN and/or the ISOC be claiming based on this ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
1:20 ARIZONA
Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-Arizona.com
http
- Original Message -
From: JIM FLEMING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Judith Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: "Causing a collision anywhere on the Internet is ethically
wrong," Gall
- Original Message -
From: JIM FLEMING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:12 AM
Subject: 0:201 COM IPv6 Servers
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sd
ivacy, security,
and consumer protection issues they raise."
@@@@@@@@@
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.mic
Symbol BLS (Investment Profile)
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
?
Lastly, if we look at the tiny, 32-bit, legacy IPv4 address space, can we
identify
blocks (ranges) of addresses which Bell South uses to provide IPv4HT ?
...if people routing IPv4HT traffic to Bell South, only route based on those
blocks, will
that be OK ?...
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images
d", (as in end-to-end)...let's see how far the IPv4 header gets
with
a 0101 in the first few bits?...what fun...
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainn
can not
imagine why they would not
want to use those vendors. Why by a "service" from companies who do not
provide the service ?
** [Yes, folks...I know TTL and checksum change, please do not send me
private mail describing
your recent "ta-da" revelation, that those fields &quo
In my opinion, the IPv4 TOS should also be "e-2-e"...
...clients should set itrouters should leave it alone
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/
- Original Message -
From: JIM FLEMING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
91 matches
Mail list logo
