On 10/11/2013 05:24 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 08/10/2013 23:31, Stephen Farrell wrote:
...
- 2.1 says nodes SHOULD forward rfc4727 experimental
headers, but earlier said that its ok (nodes MAY) default
to not forwarding packets with experimental headers. I
think you need to add
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On 03/22/2013 02:47 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
Pick two prime numbers from the catalog
Multiply the two numbers to get a candidate RSA key
Check whether the resulting pattern matches the 48 bits in the IID
I think you can be quicker than that. Generating primes is easy
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy-05: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 14 Jun 2011, at 05:51, Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
Russ,
On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
Stephen:
Comments below.
Russ
From: IETF Security Area
To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3
Title: Work on Security of IPv6
FOR ACTION
The IETF
Thanks Nick,
I'll add that unless someone tells me its a bad plan.
Its a fairly fresh I-D, but I guess it looks pretty
relevant all right.
S.
On 14/06/11 11:00, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 14/06/2011 00:09, Stephen Farrell wrote:
* RFC 6105 – IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard
* RFC 6106
forward
before adding them to this list.
Joe
On 6/14/2011 4:07 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Thanks Nick,
I'll add that unless someone tells me its a bad plan.
Its a fairly fresh I-D, but I guess it looks pretty
relevant all right.
S.
On 14/06/11 11:00, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 14/06
Thanks Russ, will make those changes.
S.
On 14/06/11 00:57, Russ Housley wrote:
Stephen:
Comments below.
Russ
From: IETF Security Area
To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3
Title: Work on Security of IPv6
FOR ACTION
The IETF thanks Study Group 17 for its liaison LS-206 Liaison
.
just my 20 cents
-as
On 5 Jun 2011, at 00:10, John Leslie wrote:
Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie wrote:
We received a liaison [1] from ITU-T saying they're
planning to start a couple of work items on the
security of IPv6. As far as we know, they envisage
developing a technical
Hi all,
We received a liaison [1] from ITU-T saying they're
planning to start a couple of work items on the
security of IPv6. As far as we know, they envisage
developing a technical guideline on deploying IPv6
and Security Management Guideline for implementation
of IPv6 environment in
11 matches
Mail list logo
