Hello.
LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 is being publushed by mboned WG
(draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2) and consequently,
IPv6 Node Requirements is being updated in the 6man WG
(draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis).
The node requirement says (in the section 5.7 in the -02 version):
|5.7. Multicast Liste
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:25:41 +), Tim Chown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I also tried to subscribe via the web page, but have received no
> acknowledgement yet.
:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:12:39PM +0900, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to subscr
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 29 May 2006 19:23:36 +0900), Arifumi
Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> * to update default rule.
> The default rule today is:
> PrefixPrecedence Label
> ::1/128 50 0
> ::/0 40 1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:39:00 +0530), Srinivas
Goud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I do agree with your points, but if you loot at rfc3775, it says that
>
> " The use of IPsec Authentication Header (AH) for the Home Address option is
> not required, except that if the
Hello.
Erik, Tatuya, and folks:
In Page 47, Section 11.3 (Path MTU Discovery and UDP),
RFC 3542 (Advanced Sockets API for IPv6) says:
| This cmsghdr will be passed to every socket that sets the
| IPV6_RECVPATHMTU socket option, even if the socket is non-connected.
| Note that this also mea
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:22:40 +0100), Zefram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On the choice of innocuous character I have no strong opinion. "_"
> seems fine. I note that ";" would be harmonious with existing syntax
I disagree to use "_" here because [v6.fe80::1_de0]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:02:05 +0100), Jeroen
Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> * That is under the assumption that Windows + KAME + Linux together are
> 'most', which could quite well be true with the number of XP's out there
> on the market and the fact that KAME
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:23:57 +0530),
Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Does anyone have any information about MLDv2 Router support implementation
> for Linux?
I don't think it is the right place to ask such question
(and it is easy to sea
