Sorry, I still don't get it. We need more detail!
Two things stand out:
If two devices happen to have the same Ethernet MAC address as a
consequence of incompetent manufacture, the link-local address derived
for that interface will also be non-unique, provided it is derived
from the EUI-64
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Thomas Narten wrote:
this 4% figure seems *very* high. Can you please provide more details on
how you reached that number?
I have personal experience with managing ADSL provider. We noticed approx
5% of all MAC addresses were identical, I've personally seen D-link
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Doesn't the home modem, or residential gateway, have hard-coded in it
the unique IPv6 prefix for each home? If yes, then why would a home PC
host not always have a unique IPv6 address, even if the MAC address
might be duplicated in some other home
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Here is the crux of my not understanding the problem:
And no, I haven't seen any residential rollout
plan where
IPv6 would be provisioned in the static way you describe,
DHCPv6-PD seems
to be the most
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Does not the ISP control, own, and distribute the residential gateway?
Not in my market anyway (some have this service of course, but it's
definitely not mandatory).
Why would ISP not own and control the residential gateway?
Because it's
to
clone the MAC address in the first place!
- Wes
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:40 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Manfredi, Albert E
Answers inline
On Nov 9, 2009, at 12:09 PM, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Here is the crux of my not understanding the problem:
And no, I haven't seen any residential rollout
plan where
IPv6 would be provisioned in
said but I didn't get it.)
Bert
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wes
Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 4:50 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
One common way of setting up
@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Here is the crux of my not understanding the problem:
And no, I haven't seen any residential rollout plan where
IPv6 would be provisioned in the static way you describe, DHCPv6-PD
Narten [mailto:nar...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:00 AM
To: David Allan I
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Liaison from BBF
Sorry, I still don't get it. We need more detail!
Two things stand out:
If two devices happen to have the same Ethernet MAC address as a
consequence
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
David Allan I
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:00 AM
To: Manfredi, Albert E; Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
HI
There are a couple of scenarios to consider..
1
FYI
D
-Original Message-
From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shem...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:03 AM
To: David Allan I; Manfredi, Albert E; Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; IPv6 Operations
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun
it.
Thanks,
Hemant
-Original Message-
From: David Allan I [mailto:david.i.al...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:14 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Manfredi, Albert E; Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; IPv6 Operations
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
Hi Hemant:
w.r.t. bridged
of
solution (c), if any?
Regards,
Woj.
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of David Allan I
Sent: 10 November 2009 00:31
To: Thomas Narten
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
HI Thomas:
Unfortunately having just
For those Microsoft challenged... my apologies in advance
D
Attached are a series of charts that outlines a problem the Broadband Forum is
wrestling with in the IPv6 space, the charts are in effect a companion to a
liaison sent to INTAREA. I understand agendas are full so there will not be
good place to find me.
Thanks,
Hemant
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
David Allan I
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:27 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF avec PDF
For those Microsoft challenged... my apologies in advance
D
security issues
that should be taken in a DSL Forum security document.
Hemant
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
David Allan I
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:27 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF avec PDF
For those Microsoft challenged
17 matches
Mail list logo
