I agree that an update should be done prior to publishing the Node
Requirements draft, but I have some issues with the language (not the
intent) proposed below...
On 11/2/11 10:50 PM, john.lough...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
There has been some discussions whether or not we should add support f
- Original Message -
From: "Shane Amante"
To: "IETF IPv6 Mailing List"
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: Flow Label support in the Node Requirements bis document
>
> On Nov 3, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > John,
> &g
On Nov 3, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> John,
>
> This should not be a surprising or controversial change to the
> node-requirements document. The WG made the decision earlier that we'd
> leave out a reference to the Flow Label work because we didn't want to
> have node-requirements b
Thomas Narten wrote:
>
> This should not be a surprising or controversial change to the
> node-requirements document. The WG made the decision earlier that we'd
> leave out a reference to the Flow Label work because we didn't want to
> have node-requirements block waiting for it, but we would rev
John,
This should not be a surprising or controversial change to the
node-requirements document. The WG made the decision earlier that we'd
leave out a reference to the Flow Label work because we didn't want to
have node-requirements block waiting for it, but we would revisit if
that work finished
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2011-11-03 15:50, john.lough...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> ... I would suggest the following text:
>>
>> All nodes SHOULD support RFC 6437, IPv6 Flow Label Specification,
>> defines the IPv6 Flow Label. Specifically:
>>
>> "Forwarding nodes such as routers and load
I support this action and the proposed text.
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> john.lough...@nokia.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:51 AM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Flow Label support in the Node Requiremen
I support this (and the proposed text), as long as it doesn't cause
more than three or four weeks' delay.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-11-03 15:50, john.lough...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been some discussions whether or not we should add support for the
> Flow Label in
> S
