Hi Jouni,
Please see in-line below.
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 2:29 PM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: 6man Mailing List; Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark; Fredrik Garneij
Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd
Hi Samita,
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Samita Chakrabarti
samita.chakraba...@ericsson.com wrote:
[snip]
SC== I understand your concern. Given that this is an IETF generic
document, it makes sense to remove the cellular/LTE reference from this
document. Will do that in the next
Hi Samita,
sorry for delay.. my emails have been a bit in limbo.
On Nov 28, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Samita Chakrabarti
samita.chakraba...@ericsson.com wrote:
[snip]
(I'll just skip this part for the time being..)
Thanks. I am just trying to get my head around this. Current statements for
Hi Jouni,
I understand this is not the forum to discuss 3GPP modifications.
The information in the draft is based on information from multiple sources who
believe that 3GPP IPv6 equipments(routers) often support DAD and periodic
router advertisements for ND implementations.
Please take a
On 11/27/12 11:41 PM, Jouni wrote:
Ok. Thanks for pointing the optionality. Missed that. If the registration is
optional, then what is the benefit? My point is that trying to optimize ND over
3GPP link any further is likely a wasted effort. As of today, there is no DAD
or address resolution,
Hi Jouni,
Please the response in-line.
-Original Message-
From: jouni korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 6:54 AM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: 6man Mailing List; Bob Hinden; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark
Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd posted
Hi,
I
; Ole Trøan; Erik Nordmark
Subject: Re: Updated Efficient-nd posted
Hi,
I had a quick glance over the I-D. Since you are referring to LTE networks (I
assume this is the indirect assumption for cellular networks in the I-D).
== Yes. It should just say 3GPP Cellular Networks. Looking at TS
Hi,
I had a quick glance over the I-D. Since you are referring to LTE networks (I
assume this is the indirect assumption for cellular networks in the I-D). I
wonder what kind of real specific benefits you envision over, say the LTE
link? Those cellular links are already rather quiescent when
Hello All:
As a follow-up from the IETF85 6man meeting presentation on Efficient-nd draft,
we
have posted a new version of the document which incorporated comments from
Carsten Bormann in the list on editorial changes and some more clarification
and editorial changes based on individual
