Hi, please read the following words.After you read the words, you may agree
that the DisablePrivacy flag is helpful.
RFC 4941
3.6. Deployment Considerations
Devices implementing this specification MUST provide a way for the
end user to explicitly enable or disable the use of temporary
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:45:54 +0100 (CET)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
The common argument from the stateful-only crowd seems to be that
they need to have a log of IPv6 address/MAC addresses for audit
purposes, and therefore think they need to have stateful, database
driven addressing to do
The common argument from the stateful-only crowd seems to be that
they need to have a log of IPv6 address/MAC addresses for audit
purposes, and therefore think they need to have stateful, database
driven addressing to do that, probably because that is how it has
been done in IPv4.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:29:54 +0800
huabing yu yhb810...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/9 Mark Smith i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:09:46 +0800
Yu Hua bing yhb810...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem
--
From: Mark Smith i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:18 PM
To: huabing yu yhb810...@gmail.com
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:29:54 +0800
On 2011-03-09 22:18, Mark Smith wrote:
...
I think you'll be more successful at achieving your fundamental goal by
observing and recording their IPv6 address use rather than trying to
control it with mechanisms they have the ability to disable.
Since we defined privacy addresses specifically
On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-03-09 22:18, Mark Smith wrote:
...
I think you'll be more successful at achieving your fundamental goal by
observing and recording their IPv6 address use rather than trying to
control it with mechanisms they have the ability to
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:41:48 +1300
Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-03-09 22:18, Mark Smith wrote:
...
I think you'll be more successful at achieving your fundamental goal by
observing and recording their IPv6 address use rather than trying to
control it with
On 2011-03-10 10:11, Mark Smith wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:41:48 +1300
Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-03-09 22:18, Mark Smith wrote:
...
I think you'll be more successful at achieving your fundamental goal by
observing and recording their IPv6 address use
The common argument from the stateful-only crowd seems to be that
they need to have a log of IPv6 address/MAC addresses for audit
purposes, and therefore think they need to have stateful, database
driven addressing to do that, probably because that is how it has
been done in IPv4.
In our
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem to
be solved is as follows:
In some sites, the network administrators want to deploy stateless
address autoconfiguration, and just permit the hardware-derived
addresses to communicate with the Internet.They will do
On 3/8/11 10:09 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote:
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem to
be solved is as follows:
In some sites, the network administrators want to deploy stateless
address autoconfiguration, and just permit the hardware-derived
addresses
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:09:46 +0800
Yu Hua bing yhb810...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem to
be solved is as follows:
In some sites, the network administrators want to deploy stateless
address autoconfiguration, and just permit
2011/3/8 Brian Haberman br...@innovationslab.net
On 3/8/11 10:09 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote:
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem to
be solved is as follows:
In some sites, the network administrators want to deploy stateless
address autoconfiguration
2011/3/9 Mark Smith i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:09:46 +0800
Yu Hua bing yhb810...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have submit draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-02. The problem to
be solved is as follows:
In some sites, the network administrators
15 matches
Mail list logo
