Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-05-03 Thread David Faulkner
the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) The major gripe I have is that a 100 watt florescent buld is not as bright as a 100 watt incondecent bulb. When they take my incondescent bulbs away, I will be in the dark. I have lost about 70% of my eye

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-05-01 Thread Patrick Martin
Thanks Dave. I tried the old ones I had last night again and just they are still noisy. But with a portable, if I get 15 or 20 feet away the noise is gone. It is not as bad as I first thought. I did notice that the CFB weight is a lot more than a regular bulb. Two of them in a dual socket weighs th

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-05-01 Thread Dave Pyatt
Patrick The lamp that I used for my test is a Globe Mini-Spiral, 13W. Dave On 30-Apr-07, at 8:47 PM, Patrick Martin wrote: > Dave, > > I will have to buy a CFB the next time I am at Fred Meyer to check it > out. > Thanks for feedback. At least there is hope with this. I don't know if > all of

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-05-01 Thread Milspec390
RF - "Cogito Mercerium, Ergo, Mortus." - Cato Imbecilius, ca. 58 C.E., his Admonition to the Senate Regarding CFL/CFB/CFM/CFCFs

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-05-01 Thread Patrick Martin
Bob, The answers from my originial question keeps coming in. The reason I mentioned moving on was from all of the flack. I also have gotten two complaint e mails from people about all of the "Non DX" on the list. We have a tendecy to get off topic too often I guess. After all, this is a DX list.

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Bob Foxworth
> I will have to buy a CFB the next time I am at Fred Meyer to check it > out. > Thanks for feedback. At least there is hope with this. I don't know if > all of the bulbs are as quiet or not. Which brand do you use? > > 73, > > Patrick Are we still on CFL's ?? (it's "Lamp", not "Bulb", or even a "

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Patrick Martin
Dave, I will have to buy a CFB the next time I am at Fred Meyer to check it out. Thanks for feedback. At least there is hope with this. I don't know if all of the bulbs are as quiet or not. Which brand do you use? 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager _

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Milspec390
The camera lies, twenty four times per second. The mind's eye doesn't. CFB light just doesn't look as good as incandescent. Do hole-i-garchs care? Why should they. They do what they want, and they know exactly what they're doing.

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Dave Pyatt
Patrick I set the 13 watt CFB about a foot away from, and in line with the loop. I set my NRD 545 to USB and tuned from about 500 to 1780 kHz. I retuned the loop every couple hundred kHz. I switched off the lamp every time I ran across a questionable signal. I did not detect a single carr

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Bob Young
The shower heads do work fine but it takes 15 minutes to take a 5 minute shower, where is the savings in that? Bob Young Millbury, Ma The shower heads seem to be fine. > > > >Russ Edmunds >Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL ) >[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia] >40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id ><[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-30 Thread Powell E. Way III W4OPW
--- Rick Kunath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least for me, I absolutely hate the color and > flicker of fluorescent > lighting. I have to tolerate it some places at work, > but I have almost no > fluorescent lighting here at home. > > Even if they are quiet, I don't like the look. This

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Walt, I am the one that asked the question about the CFB. All I wanted to know if there are any quiet ones. This thread should not have gone into a political thing. Fellas, lets move on to DX. Isn't that the real reason we are here? Infact a while ago I posted some tips. By the way, on a differ

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Rick Kunath
On Sunday 29 April 2007 10:02:17 pm Patrick Martin wrote: > Well "if" I could buy a noise free bulb, that > would be fine. I mean NO NOISE, not any. I don't want anything more that > is a noise maker in my house. At least for me, I absolutely hate the color and flicker of fluorescent lighting. I

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Walter Salmaniw
I sincerely apologize to everyone for starting this thread. I didn't expect for one minute that it would degenerate into left vs right name-calling, etc. Come on fellas. All I wanted to do was to inform the readers of the legislation here in Canada, and what effect, if any, it would have on o

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
On Sunday 29 April 2007 14:33, willis wrote: > Have you ever given serious thought as to the real reason for all these > problems of recent years?? Doesn't it seem strange to you that all of a > sudden, we have no water, no air, no electric, and an over abundance of > rules and laws that always

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
My originial question was "Are there any that do not cause QRM?" That is all I needed to know. Mandating them or not was not an issue with me other that the noise situation. We can always stock the regular bulbs if we want to. But it sounds like the new ones are quiet. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Craig, You've got a good point there. The Mercury issue is a concern on the enviorment if nothing else. But I still like the old fashioned light bulbs. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Tim, True, there are more bulbs, but in my house as I live alone, the savings would be very small. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opin

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Go back to DX at the A at 27? I don't think cx are going to be all that good tonight anyway. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions ex

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
If you fiqure a CFB lasts 10 times longer than a regular bulb and I pay 25 cents for a 60 watts regular bulb and the CFB is $3, then the cost in time is nearly the same. 25 cents X 10 is $2.50. But outlay in the beginning is more. $54 to replace them all, compared to $4.50 for regular bulbs. 73,

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Willis, That is true. There is probably a money trail. One thing is the CFBs cost more money even though they last longer. The initial outlay is more, so if everyone buys the bulbs for their houses, then look at all of the extra $$$ the companies will make. The CFBs do help conserve power. There i

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Walt, If they had that "orangy glow" then they probably were vapor lights. Oh yes, those are noisy. The CFBs I have do not knock out the dial, but cause wierd carriers on different frequencies. But it sounds like those are the early ones. I am going to try one of the new ones. 73, Patrick Patri

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Thanks Kevin, Barry, Willis, Dave and all for the great feedback on the CFBs. It looks like I may not have to stock up on regular bulbs after all. I do have 50 though, so I wont need new bulbs for sometime. hi. I will buy a new CFB and give it a try right in the DX room. 73, Patrick Patrick Mar

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Dave, Thanks for the feedback. Now, check the whole dial to see if you get any carriers, if you haven't already. I was using a touch lamp in the bedroom sometime back and even when it was off, I still got a carrier or two on the dial. One was 1570. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Man

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Berry, Small sacrafices you say? Well "if" I could buy a noise free bulb, that would be fine. I mean NO NOISE, not any. I don't want anything more that is a noise maker in my house. I hope you are right. Like I said, the ones I have in the closet are noisy, but they go back 10+ years too. I guess

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Brett Saylor
Craig Healy wrote: > For those who feel that banning the normal incandescent bulb is a good idea, > I refer you to this. Mind the potential URL wrap. > > http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=aa7796aa-e4a5-4c06-be84-b62dee548fda > > Not to prolong this ready-to-expired

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Barry McLarnon
On Sunday 29 April 2007 14:33, willis wrote: > Have you ever given serious thought as to the real reason for all these > problems of recent years?? Doesn't it seem strange to you that all of a > sudden, we have no water, no air, no electric, and an over abundance of > rules and laws that always fav

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
Very good, Russ. I put that post in a file, so I can use you comment again. Willis - Original Message - From: "Russ Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 5:53 PM Subject: Re: [IRC

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Tim Kridel
Sorry that I ratted yours. Put your tin foil hat back on. -Original Message- From: willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 5:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) Tim- You remind me of the story about the blond and the

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Craig Healy
For those who feel that banning the normal incandescent bulb is a good idea, I refer you to this. Mind the potential URL wrap. http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=aa7796aa-e4a5-4c06-be84-b62dee548fda The message here is *never* report *anything* to the government unles

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Tim Kridel
1%-2% spread across tens of millions of households adds up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Edmunds Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 5:04 PM To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Tim Kridel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But there are a lot more bulbs than TVs, computers, etc., so if > enough > incandescent bulbs are replaced with CFL, the impact on energy usage > will be > significant. > > *** Last I knew, if I have a savings of 1-2% and so does everyone else,

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Barry McLarnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Such whining! > > I'm buying only CFBs these days, and I haven't seen noise issues with > any, > except for one of the early ones that was purchased 10+ years ago. > The > technology has improved greatly in recent years, so please give them > a

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
I agree with you Tim.. Paul On 4/29/07, Tim Kridel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know what to tell you. You sound like one of those people who > perceives everything as a conspiracy. I > Tim, the whole idea is nothing more than class A1, gold platted, Bull > S&%#. > Just another form of

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Law of Unintended Consequences is joyously salivating for an > > incandescent ban. > > Gerry- > Did you really mean, "Intended" consequences? FDR wrote that "Nothing > happens by accident, if it happens, so one planned it." > > The "Law of Un

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not against new things to improve our life. But does everything > that is new have to have so much excess baggage along with it? *** The theory of planned obsolescence carries with it a sidecar containing the law of unintended consequences.

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Tim Kridel
e energy usage. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willis Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 4:43 PM To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) - Original Message - From:

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
- Original Message - From: "Tim Kridel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > But there are a lot more bulbs than TVs, computers, etc., so if enough > incandescent bulbs are replaced with CFL, the impact on energy usage will be > significant. Tim, the whole idea is nothing more than class A1, gold platted

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Tim Kridel
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) > What gets me is, saving a few watts on a light bulb or two, while people > run big screen TVs, computers, etc. Those use a lot more juice than a > light bulb or two. P

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
> What gets me is, saving a few watts on a light bulb or two, while people > run big screen TVs, computers, etc. Those use a lot more juice than a > light bulb or two. Pat- There corporate money behind this light bulb crap. Just like insurance companies, when the money gets right and into the 'cor

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Walter Salmaniw
At 10:52 AM 4/29/2007, you wrote: >Such whining! > >I'm buying only CFBs these days, and I haven't seen noise issues with any, >except for one of the early ones that was purchased 10+ years ago. The >technology has improved greatly in recent years, so please give them a fair >shake. > >I also

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
> Right-o! > > Too much weed it is, drift algae, plentiful locally. cheaper than No. > Atlantic seaweed, albeit effective. Yes, that Atlantic sea weed is the best. In the navy in 1965, we went through the Sargasso sea. Solid sea weed. Great smokin' for the whole ship!! But let dry first, lite

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Powell E. Way III W4OPW
--- willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The major gripe I have is that a 100 watt florescent > buld is not as bright > as a 100 watt incondecent bulb. Incandescent. You can't purchase a 100 W standard base fluorescent compact. The 100 watt ones are mogul base, and generally are 6500 lumens.

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
> I'm buying only CFBs these days, and I haven't seen noise issues with any, > except for one of the early ones that was purchased 10+ years ago. The > technology has improved greatly in recent years, so please give them a fair > shake. Yes, we have 6 in the house, no QRN. The major problem is the

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Dave Pyatt
The apartment building, where I live, just replaced all incandescent bulbs with compact fluorescent. If i recall correctly, the building supervisor said they replaced over 3200 bulbs. I just tested one by moving a lamp next to my 40" loop and listening on 4 empty AM frequencies. I did not

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Milspec390
Right-o! Too much weed it is, drift algae, plentiful locally. cheaper than No. Atlantic seaweed, albeit effective. z ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ___ IR

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Barry McLarnon
Such whining! I'm buying only CFBs these days, and I haven't seen noise issues with any, except for one of the early ones that was purchased 10+ years ago. The technology has improved greatly in recent years, so please give them a fair shake. I also have a low-flush toilet and a low-flow show

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
> Yes, UK is infected w/this virus, the home of 'knife control', as they call > it, with a straight face. First, ban. Next, house by house confiscation. They > think of everything. Good time to bury incandescents & vacuum tubes in PVC > pipes, along w/whatever else might be in them. Oh, come on,

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread willis
> The Law of Unintended Consequences is joyously salivating for an > incandescent ban. Gerry- Did you really mean, "Intended" consequences? FDR wrote that "Nothing happens by accident, if it happens, so one planned it." Willis ___ IRCA mailing list I

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
I am not against new things to improve our life. But does everything that is new have to have so much excess baggage along with it? A noise free bulb that uses 10% of the power would be nice. If there are any noise free ones out there, I would like to know which ones. Kevin, what brand are yours? I

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Gerry Bishop
erica Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) I just have had experience with the two Pacific Power sent as freebe's. I still have them, but they put out carriers. My originial thread, I asked if there were any "noise free" CFB's out there. But I have noticed at Fred

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
What gets me is, saving a few watts on a light bulb or two, while people run big screen TVs, computers, etc. Those use a lot more juice than a light bulb or two. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-d

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
I just have had experience with the two Pacific Power sent as freebe's. I still have them, but they put out carriers. My originial thread, I asked if there were any "noise free" CFB's out there. But I have noticed at Fred Meyer the CFB's that were $10 each have come down to $2.95 ea now. So more pe

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Patrick Martin
Bob, I am not sure if the word is "otlawed" per se, but as with many other things through the years, they may be very hard to get if not impossible. However, UK, Canada, some US states (CA) are moving in that direction. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread kevin redding
> Ca. '91, Narragansett Electric Co. offered Rhode Islanders who > lived in Gold > Medallion Homes several cash savers. I had EXACTLY the same deal in 1989. I guarantee you, that Naragansett Electric guy made a believer out of me with the CFLs. > Next made generous proposition. Accept sever

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs), (quote of the week)

2007-04-29 Thread Bob Young
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of >America >To: irca@hard-core-dx.com >Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) >Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:23:08 EDT >Still, >incandescents preferred, warmer light. Difference

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Milspec390
1. Per earlier post re Rhode Islanders & former Narragansett Electric Co., CFB program entirely voluntary. Company intent: promote CFBs & juice-saving w/free samples. Entirely benign & beneficial to homeowners. Very kind of them, actually, to test for & seal air leaks. Fellow who arrived most i

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Gerry Bishop
: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) B - This is what some RI legislator proposes. CA leads way, along w/couple other states. Bans set several years into future - in tradition adopted during 90s - subsequent to couple election cycles. They know exactly what they're doing. State by

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Milspec390
Yes, UK is infected w/this virus, the home of 'knife control', as they call it, with a straight face. First, ban. Next, house by house confiscation. They think of everything. Good time to bury incandescents & vacuum tubes in PVC pipes, along w/whatever else might be in them.

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Milspec390
B - This is what some RI legislator proposes. CA leads way, along w/couple other states. Bans set several years into future - in tradition adopted during 90s - subsequent to couple election cycles. They know exactly what they're doing. State by state thing. Rooftop beacons here use incan

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Milspec390
Ca. '91, Narragansett Electric Co. offered Rhode Islanders who lived in Gold Medallion Homes several cash savers. Fellow arrived. Politely introduced himself. Produced massive rubber boot, one end of which he affixed to large fan, other to door. Secured windows. Turned on fan. Calculated air le

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-29 Thread Bob Young
ailing list for the International Radio Club of >America" >Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) >Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:07:59 -0400 > > > > > Do what I am going to do, stock up on the regular bulbs. >Pat- >It is my understanding that not only

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Willis, I always buy things I need on sale. Sometimes, I forget how many of something I have. I just counted and I have 42 - 60 & 75 watts bulbs. I found a few I had behind some other stuff that apparently have been there for years. I also found two packages of 100 watt ones (8) I never have used

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread willis
> Do what I am going to do, stock up on the regular bulbs. Pat- It is my understanding that not only will NOT be able to buy the old bulbs, but you NOT be able to have them in your home. The SS will take them from you. But that is a good idea, and I have started to stock up. Willis

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Willis, Do what I am going to do, stock up on the regular bulbs. I don't know what you pay, but a a quarter a piece here and then getting a third pack free, stocking up on a couple hundred bulbs is not much. Then we will have them for the rest of our lives. The gov wont take them away from us, bu

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Mike, Good question. Has the ARRL even mentioned it? Anyone know? Unless they radiate a short distance, not to cause much QRM. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin KAVT Reception Manager ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Kevin, The two Pacific Power sent out as freebes back in the 90s cause carriers up and down the dial. Dxer friend, Dave Williams has been fighting one somewhere close to his home that puts a carrier right on 750 khz (KXL Portland), but it seems to drift too. Sometimes it is on 745 khz. 73, Patr

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Walt, I have heard the UK is moving in that direction too. California may mandate that in the near future also as they have energy issues especially in the Summer with all of the A/C and hot weather. In NW Oregon we pay 05 to 06 cents per k/h. no biggie. As far as my DXing goes, it comes first reg

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread willis
> Okay, call me dense, but if (as I have always understood) florescent > bulbs of whatever type cause QRM, why haven't we heard anything from > AROs/ARRL? > > Just curious. No money in it! ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://m

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread willis
The major gripe I have is that a 100 watt florescent buld is not as bright as a 100 watt incondecent bulb. When they take my incondescent bulbs away, I will be in the dark. I have lost about 70% of my eye site, and the new bulbs just don't do the trick. But those who have handycaps won't be aroun

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread kevin redding
> *** $15 a month ? How many of them do you have ? I have ZERO incandescent bulbs ANYWHERE in my house. Kevin ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailin

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Brett Saylor
> I haven't any flourescents in my home for obvious reasons. But I also > have no 100-watt nor 75-watt incandescent bulbs in regular use. I have > a couple of 75's in dark areas of the basement, but they don't get much > use. > > > Russ Edmunds I have a few fluorescents in my house that do cause

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Mike Hardester
Okay, call me dense, but if (as I have always understood) florescent bulbs of whatever type cause QRM, why haven't we heard anything from AROs/ARRL? Just curious. Patrick Martin wrote: > Greetings, > > Are there any CFB's that do not cause RF noise? The ones I tried several > ye

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- kevin redding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The ones I bought in 1989 are still operating. Since using them, I > have had no additional noise. My power bill has dropped $15 a month. > > *** $15 a month ? How many of them do you have ? Russ Edmunds Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL ) [15 mi NNW

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread kevin redding
The ones I bought in 1989 are still operating. Since using them, I have had no additional noise. My power bill has dropped $15 a month. I am very happy with CFLs. Kevin On Apr 28, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Russ Edmunds wrote: > The consensus seems to be that they last far longer and consume far > l

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread kevin redding
Every one I have used since 1989 have been dead silent. Kevin On Apr 28, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Patrick Martin wrote: > Are there any CFB's that do not cause RF noise? ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listin

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Gerry Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Watch batteries don't, generally, shatter on contact with a kitchen > floor. > > Perhaps someone can explain to me why these bulbs are "better" than > incandescent bulbs? > > *** The consensus seems to be that they last far longer and consume f

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Gerry Bishop
ehalf Of Walter Salmaniw Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:14 PM To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs) Haven't noticed anything on the list, but the Government of Canada has introduced legislation to eliminate sales of incande

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Milspec390
Rhode Island Legislature, according to _www.projo.com_ (http://www.projo.com) , is considering mandating these little noisemakers & banning incandescent. They really do want us to be held incommunicado, don't they? z **

Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Walter Salmaniw
Haven't noticed anything on the list, but the Government of Canada has introduced legislation to eliminate sales of incandescent light bulbs by the year 2012. I'm sure this won't help the world of dxing, especially if there's a flood of cheap noisy bulbs. This has already caused a certain amou

[IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

2007-04-28 Thread Patrick Martin
Greetings, Are there any CFB's that do not cause RF noise? The ones I tried several years back caused all sorts of carriers on the band. I was told the newer ones are quieter. Anyone know? The LCD bulbs are quiet, but to buy enough to cover a whole house would cost a fortune at $50 for bulb. In s