[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487571#comment-13487571
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-6721:
In the current implementation we handle META the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487572#comment-13487572
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-7043:
What keeps it from getting into 0.94? Is it the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487573#comment-13487573
]
stack commented on HBASE-6793:
--
Patch looks great. Nice cleanup.
One question, will we be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-7079:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Patch looks good to me (Has formatting issues but i can fix on commit).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487578#comment-13487578
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-7070:
---
+1 for flag. Looks easy to understand then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487579#comment-13487579
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4583:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487581#comment-13487581
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7051:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487587#comment-13487587
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-5500:
---
This is already done as part of HBASE-6224
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487589#comment-13487589
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7055:
--
I don't see any reason to introduce another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matteo Bertozzi updated HBASE-6353:
---
Attachment: HBASE-6353-v1.patch
Snapshots shell
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chunhui shen updated HBASE-7070:
Attachment: HBASE-7070v6.patch
Using retry flag for in OutOfOrderScannerNextException patchV6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leitao Guo updated HBASE-5982:
--
Description:
In our application, we need to handle the following SQL-like process on hbase.
There are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leitao Guo updated HBASE-5982:
--
Summary: HBase Coprocessor Local Aggregation (was: HBase Coprocessor
Locate)
HBase Coprocessor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487610#comment-13487610
]
Jan Van Besien commented on HBASE-4844:
---
I have never really given the combination
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7077:
--
Attachment: HBASE-7071.patch
Testcase that shows the problem.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-7077:
--
Attachment: HBASE-7071_testcasewithassert.patch
Same testcase with some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Kishore updated HBASE-6389:
--
Attachment: HBASE-6389_0.94.patch
Attaching patch for 0.94 branch. The patch passes full test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Kishore updated HBASE-6389:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.94.3
Modify the conditions to ensure that Master waits for sufficient
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487636#comment-13487636
]
Aditya Kishore commented on HBASE-6389:
---
Not sure how to submit it for 0.94 builds.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487639#comment-13487639
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6389:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487665#comment-13487665
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6389:
---
Hadoop QA only checks patch for trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487798#comment-13487798
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7066:
---
Integrated to trunk.
Thanks for the patch Francis. Do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu updated HBASE-7070:
--
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Scanner may retry forever after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487837#comment-13487837
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7070:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487840#comment-13487840
]
Kumar Ravi commented on HBASE-6945:
---
stack, Thanks for the clarification. ok - I'll
I am totally stuck here.
I have table which is called url and where are p, and i and s families.
Table url have 8300 rows.
Those rows are inserted like
key:x columnfamily:p: value:webpage content
Now, when I do scan in Hadoop, I add right columnFamily p, and try to
process all those 8300
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487854#comment-13487854
]
stack commented on HBASE-7066:
--
Previously, if an exception in CPs in say the shutdown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487855#comment-13487855
]
Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-7055:
I agree with Enis. Imagine if each component has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487891#comment-13487891
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7066:
---
If AccessDeniedException is thrown, shutdown would not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487893#comment-13487893
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-6353:
Last minute realization - do we need to add some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487911#comment-13487911
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-6353:
---
Hey Matteo, there was a test script that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487912#comment-13487912
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-6353:
---
(Most of the shell code in hbase isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487917#comment-13487917
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-6353:
[~jmhsieh] doesn't mean we shouldn't test it :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487925#comment-13487925
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-6353:
---
I don't think the ruby stuff fits into a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487935#comment-13487935
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-2645:
---
{code}
r1403977 | stack | 2012-10-30 21:48:37 -0700 (Tue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu updated HBASE-2645:
--
Attachment:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestHLogSplit-output.txt
I can reproduce the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487958#comment-13487958
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-6793:
-
There's some example code in various
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487970#comment-13487970
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-6694:
---
[~alo.alt], I've tried locally a few times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487988#comment-13487988
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7055:
-
Wrt documentation: The original jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487995#comment-13487995
]
Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-6305:
Can someone please take a look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487997#comment-13487997
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-7055:
I'm guessing the separate config file is used to
Jimmy Xiang created HBASE-7080:
--
Summary: TestHFileOutputFormat.testColumnFamilyCompression failing
due to UnsatisfiedLinkError
Key: HBASE-7080
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HBASE-7080:
---
Attachment: trunk_7080.patch
TestHFileOutputFormat.testColumnFamilyCompression failing due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HBASE-7080:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488011#comment-13488011
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-5898:
---
bq. The most likely explanation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488014#comment-13488014
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7055:
---
Todd's reasoning is right.
CompactionConfiguration was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488029#comment-13488029
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-6793:
A couple more comments on RB [~sershe], but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488028#comment-13488028
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5898:
--
You wanna just commit it? It won't do any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488032#comment-13488032
]
Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-6305:
If the scheme is not null. The path will have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488033#comment-13488033
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7055:
--
bq. I'm guessing the separate config file is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488039#comment-13488039
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7055:
---
bq. this is not the leveldb approach
Correct. That's why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488036#comment-13488036
]
Gregory Chanan commented on HBASE-7080:
---
+1.
issues@ is the wrong mailing list for this, I'm putting it in BCC and
replying now to user@
First guess that comes in mind is that not all your rows have data in
p:, if it's really the only family you are scanning in your MR.
Trying doing a scan in the shell in p: and see what comes out.
J-D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
rajeshbabu updated HBASE-6665:
--
Attachment: HBASE-6665_92.patch
HBASE-6665_94.patch
Patch for 94 and 92.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488048#comment-13488048
]
Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-6305:
bq. If the scheme is not null.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488050#comment-13488050
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6665:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488053#comment-13488053
]
Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-6305:
Path.toString() will add the scheme if it's not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488061#comment-13488061
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5982:
---
Where are the attachments on this issue?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488064#comment-13488064
]
Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-6305:
Path object, if you follow it how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488067#comment-13488067
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-6894:
-
Thanks!
What does this do in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488069#comment-13488069
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5898:
---
I think we can commit this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488071#comment-13488071
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-6665:
---
thanks for the patches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488076#comment-13488076
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-6721:
---
bq. If the group information was stored on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488078#comment-13488078
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7080:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488080#comment-13488080
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7043:
---
bq. What keeps it from getting into 0.94?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488082#comment-13488082
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-6721:
---
The current attached patch makes a ton of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488082#comment-13488082
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-6721 at 10/31/12 6:51 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488086#comment-13488086
]
Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-6305:
Can you do something like below?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488089#comment-13488089
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6904:
--
Is this not an issue on 0.96?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-5498:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.3)
0.94.4
Moving to 0.94.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488098#comment-13488098
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-7066:
---
Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #3501 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488105#comment-13488105
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7042:
---
Seems reasonable.
On the current patch:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488114#comment-13488114
]
Tammo van Lessen commented on HBASE-3835:
-
I stumbled upon this accidentally. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gregory Chanan updated HBASE-6904:
--
Affects Version/s: 0.96.0
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
It's an issue against 0.96 and the
Andrew Purtell created HBASE-7081:
-
Summary: Consider porting security/RPC improvements from Hadoop
Key: HBASE-7081
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7081
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-7081:
--
Description:
To start, see HADOOP-8991 (Add support for SASL PLAIN authentication) and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-7081:
--
Component/s: security
IPC/RPC
Consider porting security/RPC improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-7081:
--
Summary: Consider SASL improvements (was: Consider porting security/RPC
improvements from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-7081:
--
Description:
To start, see HADOOP-8991 (Add support for SASL PLAIN authentication) and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488139#comment-13488139
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-3835:
It looks like our current LICENSE.txt doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488143#comment-13488143
]
Gregory Chanan commented on HBASE-7051:
---
Patch looks good. Mind testing with Ram's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488147#comment-13488147
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7063:
---
+1 I've had this thought before too Enis.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488159#comment-13488159
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7049:
---
+1 Administratively triggered online
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Himanshu Vashishtha updated HBASE-7072:
---
Attachment: HBase-7072-92.patch
This patch provides a method to read 94 server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488160#comment-13488160
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7051:
--
You mean HBASE-7077 I assume :)
Yeah, will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488163#comment-13488163
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7051:
--
Yep... Fails without this patch, but passes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488172#comment-13488172
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7077:
--
Nice test Ram! I verified that it passes with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488174#comment-13488174
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7051:
--
OK... Lemme commit this, followed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488176#comment-13488176
]
Gregory Chanan commented on HBASE-7051:
---
I'm +1 on this. I haven't looked at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HBASE-7080:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488192#comment-13488192
]
Gregory Chanan commented on HBASE-7077:
---
The test references HBASE-7071, but that is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488195#comment-13488195
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7055:
-
We discussed with Enis and it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488196#comment-13488196
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7055:
-
Now that I think of it, any objections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488198#comment-13488198
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-7066:
Stack, IMHO it really depends on what the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488215#comment-13488215
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-7066:
Ted, I did not change the signatures for HMaster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488216#comment-13488216
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-7055:
+1 to separate out the compaction policy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13488223#comment-13488223
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7055:
--
bq. +1 to separate out the compaction policy
Jimmy Xiang created HBASE-7082:
--
Summary: TestHFileCleaner#testHFileCleaning fails due to cleaner
is reset
Key: HBASE-7082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7082
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HBASE-7082:
---
Attachment: trunk-7082.patch
TestHFileCleaner#testHFileCleaning fails due to cleaner is reset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HBASE-7082:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
TestHFileCleaner#testHFileCleaning fails due to cleaner is
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
